Marty1968
Full Member
- Joined
- Oct 2, 2013
- Messages
- 1,903
We're waiting for almost no reason....I have a keeper and want to pick my next player!
We're waiting for almost no reason....I have a keeper and want to pick my next player!
Nah.i hate you guys, know you are going to pick him.....
Solid keeper, solid name, can't go wrong.Weren't you a little over excited about this pick?
Definitely solid name and solid keeper. I expected another Mijatovic after the buildup thoughSolid keeper, solid name, can't go wrong.
It's Balu!Definitely solid name and solid keeper. I expected another Mijatovic after the buildup though
Ok so my next pick, and in my view the best 'eligible' Englishman to play abroad (behind Keegan). Champions League winner twice and Man of the Match in the 2000 final where he scored an absolute beauty. In an era where Madrid bought a new Galactico every year, he managed to adapt to whichever midfield position he played and won the hearts of the Madrid fans by his 100% dedication to the team and versatility.
He won 8 trophies and played in 11 cup finals in four years as well as constantly making the semi-finals of the UEFA Champions league in each of his four years at the club.
Quotes from ex-coach Del Bosque: "together he kept the whole team united. I was very happy with Macca. He was a caballero, a gentleman, a stupendous guy; he always had a smile, he never complained, he was great, a leader. He related to everyone very well; he united people. He was exemplary ... and a good footballer too, very good. A fantastic player in every sense."
Oh and I had to pick the picture below showing Cocu being done like a kipper (he just so happens to be in my opponents team)
A couple of his finest moments in a Madrid shirt for you guys to enjoy.
Hope Iso doesn't go for the Italian midfielder!
His first season he was up to his 1998 level. Granted his second one he was not that good one but this is league peak form and I'd say his first season is right up there with all the others picked so far.
If you thought this thread was harsh, match with Viva will be brutal!
In theory you could field a player who was very good for 3/4 of one season, and largely crap in two seasons following that. If you happen to draft him, you'll obviously focus on the former and - simply - claim that this was his (legitimate) peak, and the rest has no relevance.
I think generally we've used 2-3 years of form as a basis for peak, with anything below that a bit wobbly and anything longer a bonus. So wobbly would mean a performance is not necessarily guaranteed, while a longer peak would almost guarantee the delivery of a performance.
I wasn't shocked: just surprised by his fixation on my team
The match could become harsh indeed
Seems like that Italian 'midfielder' is yours . Would be a great addition to any team, though.If Iso doesn't take him we will.
I think generally we've used 2-3 years of form as a basis for peak, with anything below that a bit wobbly and anything longer a bonus. So wobbly would mean a performance is not necessarily guaranteed, while a longer peak would almost guarantee the delivery of a performance.
way way way back loldamn it. someone got Modric already.
think everyone who runs the draft should put peak length in the rules, for all-time drafts its pretty easy as we all know that we are looking at the period of 3 years but this league drafts and such are the problem as its impossible to play with that criteria. Draft master should determine peak for every draft, if we play the league draft or something similar than its a one/two season peak if its Euro/WC then its one tournament or xy number of games and so on for every draft.
I don't want to philosophise but there is a difference between "The greatest players in the History of Liga/Calcio/Bundesliga" and "League peak of the Greatest Players".
Maybe, in the future, we can add more objective criteria.
The 5 nationalities wasn't really intended to be an 'issue' for you all. It was simply to make sure you didn't have 4 italians, 4 germans and 4 spaniards in your teamI don't want to philosophise but there is a difference between "The greatest players in the History of Liga/Calcio/Bundesliga" and "League peak of the Greatest Players".
Maybe, in the future, we can add more objective criteria.
By the way, the criteria "5 nationalities" is anything but an issue!
Don't think that can be easily defined. For example, Vieri was in Atletico for just a season...but I would not hesitate to put that as one of his peaks. There is a bit of argument to be made by managers when it's not as clearly defined. After that it's up to the voters to make their own decision.
Don't think they are mutually exclusive.
- You cannot be a GOAT in the 3 leagues without having your peak in them. Clear cut.
- If you pick a GOAT whose peak was clearly elsewhere, then it's up the manager to argue that he was good in the 3 leagues as he was elsewhere. Subjective.
In the end, NT form or other leagues form becomes mostly secondary data or totally irrelevant. It's the 3 leagues which takes priority here.
he was number 1 on our list
The 5 nationalities wasn't really intended to be an 'issue' for you all. It was simply to make sure you didn't have 4 italians, 4 germans and 4 spaniards in your team
Totally agree with all this. No need to define the peak any more than we have already. The peak is "league" not "career" and it's your job as manager to argue how effective each and every player was during that time. A player could have been at a particular club for 5/6 years and been cr*p and then move to another club for 2 years and be awesome...Take Forlan for example. Garbage at United for 3 years no matter how much us fans loved him and then a goal machine at Atletico for 3 years.
In my mind, that's the whole point of these drafts...to be able to argue a point about how good a particular player was in the role you've given him and his abilities to be judged on how he performed for that particular club.