Hoof the ball
Full Member
A couple of pics of Mbappe when he was younger
How does Mbappe's face look like he's in his early 30's when he's about 14/15 there?
A couple of pics of Mbappe when he was younger
How does Mbappe's face look like he's in his early 30's when he's about 14/15 there?
We don't need to imagine @Cal?
A couple of pics of Mbappe when he was younger
It's not in their interest to drop PSG, it's their flagship project that draws dividends much bigger than the investment. It's their statement that they're able to manage an ambitious and sustainable project, dropping it along the way would send the opposite message.Plus the owners might loose interest after world cup 2022
Has that ever been the case? This has got to go down as one of the cliche statements fans throw around just like "They'll make the money back by selling shirts".Plus the owners might loose interest after world cup 2022
He looks younger now
Has that ever been the case? This has got to go down as one of the cliche statements fans throw around just like "They'll make the money back by selling shirts".
1990s eredivisie was better than Ligue 1 currently is.Ronaldo was still playing in Eredivisie when he was a teenager (turned 20 at the start of his first barca season) and as a striker though.
Mbappe had close to a goal per game (or was it 90 min?) ratio when he played in the middle for Monaco IIRC.
1990s eredivisie was better than Ligue 1 currently is.
And Mbappe average roughly one goal every two games so far in Ligue 1 compared to Ronaldo's one goal per game strike rate.
Ronaldo was still playing in Eredivisie when he was a teenager (turned 20 at the start of his first barca season) and as a striker though.
Mbappe had close to a goal per game (or was it 90 min?) ratio when he played in the middle for Monaco IIRC.
What makes you state that Eredivisie was better? post-90 Bosman meant Dutch clubs lacked the one thing they had prior to '90..... money. It was that which caused the exodus in the 90s of all the best talent they had. If you make a direct comparison with Ligue 1 then certainly Dutch clubs, even then, didn't have the financial resources to offer competitive salaries to keep players, whereas, Ligue 1, presently, has that capacity. Is Ligue 1 better than 90's Eredivisie (Ajax were an anomaly in that decade)? Yep. Is it better than pre-'90 Holland? Now that's an argument!
To be fair to Mbappe, he's not playing centrally and he's not the focus of their attacks. He's out on the right and he often holds his position wide. Put him where Cavani is, then you have a fair comparison with Ronaldo at PSV, since, Ronaldo played centrally with Luc Nilis.
Ya I would agree with that. Still way to early but Ronaldo definitely had the dribbling to go along with the explosiveness. He was surgical in tight spaces.I might be biased, but his difference with Fat Ronaldo is that if Mbappe has a serious injury (knock on wood), and loses his explosiveness, he would become a much less relevant player compared to what Ronaldo managed without all his athletic capabilities. Of course he was taller, stronger and played center forward, but his technique and tight space was considerably better. Also his underrated two footedness and combination plays. I feel like Mbappe without all his speed would be a decent player and that’s it.
Sorry is this post from 2017? This really doesn't make sense after his WC.Comparisons to (chubby) Ronaldo are far too premature. I don't know why people are so desperate to hype up young players these days and heap so much pressure on them to become the next [insert legendary footballer]
Ronaldo was still playing in Eredivisie when he was a teenager (turned 20 at the start of his first barca season) and as a striker though.
Mbappe had close to a goal per game (or was it 90 min?) ratio when he played in the middle for Monaco IIRC.
Have psg signed him yet?
The Eredivisie wasn't even better than Ligue 1 in the 90s.
Well but your link does show that the dutch league scored more points than the french league in the two seasons Ronaldo played in it. And it even tops the chart once during that period.The Eredivisie wasn't even better than Ligue 1 in the 90s.
Well but your link does show that the dutch league scored more points than the french league in the two seasons Ronaldo played in it. And it even tops the chart once during that period.
You didn't read the table, they are classed by average. If you make a table based on the points it looks like this:
Ajax 22pts
PSG 19pts
Bordeaux 18pts
Nantes 15pts
Feyenoord 13pts
PSV 12pts
Lyon 9pts
Lens 8pts
Strasbourg 4pts
Auxerre 4pts
Roda JC 3pts
Monaco 2pts
Which league is better, based on that? ( I admit that it's not foolproof)
Well I was talking about averages.
Ultimately it doesn't really matter anyway. I don't think these few results tell too much, just thought it's funny that the dutch league had the highest average in one of the seasons Ronaldo played in it.
To be fair it's not like I think the dutch league was amazing back then but regarding the Ronaldo-Mbappe comparison the important part is that it was a decent league with one amazing team in it and the current french league is a decent league with one good team in it.
You sure that isn’t his dad?
Sure and you check out what Ronaldo actually did before Sept. 1996, compared to what Mbappe accomplished by now. You're right that it's not even close.Please just don't compare Mbappe to R9 U20, he is not even close. Just search Ronaldo U20 video in youtube
Mbappe wasn't even the best player for the French team, Ronaldo was the best player in the world at 19. Mbappe's not even close to that, it's a daft comparison.Sure and you check out what Ronaldo actually did before Sept. 1996, compared to what Mbappe accomplished by now. You're right that it's not even close.
No you are wrong. He was not the best player in the world when he was 19, he was mostly injured the whole year last year for PSV. Ronaldo was 20 when he had his big performances for Barca which earned him the 2nd place Ballon D'or.Mbappe wasn't even the best player for the French team, Ronaldo was the best player in the world at 19. Mbappe's not even close to that, it's a daft comparison.
Mbappe being faster than Ronaldo is quite a bold claim. Look at the first clip of the first video. That's a 33 year old, clearly overweight Ronaldo who only is a shadow of his young self allegedly hitting 36 km/h. The second video is the best compilation of his speed I could find quickly. Ronaldo's pace was unreal. Don't think there really was a faster player than him in his prime.
Henry was substantially faster than R9, I think Mbappe is right around the pace R9 was, maybe a bit faster but he's also much lighter. R9 was pretty much as quick but was a tank on top of it.
Eredevisie in the 90's wasn't even better than the Portuguese League and was slightly better than the Belgian League.The Eredivisie wasn't even better than Ligue 1 in the 90s.
Ronaldo didn't lose his athletic capabilities after the injuries. He lost quit a bit of it, for sure, but he started from such absurd heights than even after the 2 devastating knee injuries at inter he was still a freak compared to almost every other player. Mbappé isn't quite that freakish, but he's a freak too. If he loses like 40% of it(like ronnie more or less) he'd still be at the very topI might be biased, but his difference with Fat Ronaldo is that if Mbappe has a serious injury (knock on wood), and loses his explosiveness, he would become a much less relevant player compared to what Ronaldo managed without all his athletic capabilities. Of course he was taller, stronger and played center forward, but his technique and tight space was considerably better. Also his underrated two footedness and combination plays. I feel like Mbappe without all his speed would be a decent player and that’s it.
Ronaldo didn't lose his athletic capabilities after the injuries. He lost quit a bit of it, for sure, but he started from such absurd heights than even after the 2 devastating knee injuries at inter he was still a freak compared to almost every other player. Mbappé isn't quite that freakish, but he's a freak too. If he loses like 40% of it(like ronnie more or less) he'd still be at the very top
But yes, Mbappé doesn't look quite as special as Ronnie. Tbf, the only player who's ever looked that special since is Messi. And it doesn't even mean Mbappé isn't as good at the same age, i mean his performances speak for themselves. But he doesn't look quite as good
IIRC Ronaldo already had surgery on his knee before he moved to PSV, then he had surgery on it at PSV, then twice in the span of two years at inter, then again at Milan...
Entirely possible in that era(del piero almost certainly was a victim of this), but his knees always were problematic, and he never particularly bulked up until 2002, so. More likely the size of and explosiveness of his leg muscles, combined with the way he moved, put too much stress on the knees. There's also the fact he regularly played with infiltrations of painkillersIf you listen to the conspiracy theories, that's got a lot to do with his use of steroids to bulk him up.
Comparisons to (chubby) Ronaldo are far too premature. I don't know why people are so desperate to hype up young players these days and heap so much pressure on them to become the next [insert legendary footballer]
Let the kid develop and see where he ends up in a few years
How does Mbappe's face look like he's in his early 30's when he's about 14/15 there?
Its not conspiracy theories, it was quite common to hear youth football coaches here in Portugal during late 90's beggining of 2000's making jokes about this "developed" young Brazilians coming into Europe. Ronaldo or Adriano were the most talked about that.If you listen to the conspiracy theories, that's got a lot to do with his use of steroids to bulk him up.
Mbappe's first step and his ability to go from 0 to 100 is way more impressive than his actual speed.
There are plenty of players just as fast if not faster at maximum speed (such as Varane and Dembele in his national team) but most of them don't have Mbappe's acceleration.