Kylian Mbappé | Player Performance Thread

You will have to double that. One of the problems is that Monaco are in the green this year with the 65m that they are supposed to get from the CL and they are going to sell at least two players who should be Bakayoko and Fabinho. Bakayoko has been reportedly replaced by Tielemans and Fabinho should be replaced by Méïté both will probably cost less that what Monaco will get for one of their midfielders. That's why Monaco aren't likely to discount Mbappé.
I'd imagine it will take around the same sum or probably 10m more like we paid them for Martial, given that both have similar output at the time and were generally regarded high? Double that is insane at this point.
 
I'd imagine it will take around the same sum or probably 10m more like we paid them for Martial, given that both have similar output at the time and were generally regarded high? Double that is insane at this point.

No, Martial has never been rated as high as Mbappé. They are not in the same division.
 
Yeah I think he's a much better talent, but double the amount on the back of 6 months? I mean really?

It's not 6 months though, Mbappé has been good from the start of the season but Jardim wanted to protect him after a concussion. But he was playing wide for the most part and was pretty good. He also started his career last year and he was one of the only attacking bright lights with Lemar.
 
Yeah I think he's a much better talent, but double the amount on the back of 6 months? I mean really?
You have to consider the market inflation. Monaco's reasoning will be that we paid 50-60m (however much per goal, or whatever fecking deal Ed made) for Martial, and Mbappe is wanted by every top club in Europe. We also just paid a world record fee for Pogba.

If we don't sign Mbappe (and I don't think we will), he'll move to Real or Barca, and it'll be for at least 90m-100m. For us, that price would be closer to £120m. An 18 year old contributing to 40 goals in half a season (he was a substitute for the first half) against some elite European teams, is absolutely phenomenal. Makes 18 year old Rooney look ordinary on a pure statistical basis. The guy is putting up Messi type numbers.
 
I disagree. Who contributes more and can they do it against tougher opposition in the PL are the key questions.

Some stats on the two, and Sanchez for a measure of a top PL player:

To start, total contributions (assist or goal):
Mbappe - 29
Griezmann - 35
Sanchez - 41

How many contributions have they made where the team has won by two goals or more, vs. closer/tougher games, i.e are they just going to town on poor opposition and disappearing in difficult games:

Mbappe - 21 v 8
Griezmann - 21 v 14
Sanchez - 30 v 11

Another question would be maybe those big winning margins are all down to them and it's not fair to say they can only do it against weak opposition. When they score, is it the team doing the work or is it because they're just so good individually? So, how many of the games they contribute in are they responsible for 50% or more of the team's goals?

Mbappe - 11
Griezmann - 17
Sanchez - 22



What all that says to me is both put up good numbers but Mbappe struggles to score against tougher opposition, and when Atletico win Griezmann is often the reason why. Mbappe needs the team to dominate before he starts performing. He won't be the one to drag you over the line.

It also shows how screwed Arsenal will be if Sanchez leaves.

You could have saved all that time you typed up your post by reading my post again. I am not comparing an 18 year old to experienced players for this season, I specifically mentioned "if put in the correct situation" he has the "potential" to reach far greater heights. As for this season, he's not too bad at what he does at the age of 18, that is stick the ball in the back of the net.
 
Far greater heights than the third best player in the world? And you say that about a player who has had half a good season, in which I assume you haven't watched the majority of his games. Wow

You missed the part about "If and can" and about "potential". Also, Ballon d'Or is very debatable after Ronaldo and Messi.
 
I do not know if he will go for a world record and I really do not care. But, if he goes this summer it will be for huge money. If we are not willing to take a risk on him someone else will.

Absolutely right. If he goes to Real Madrid, Barcelona(very unlikely), City or Chelsea, do people see those clubs sending him to United if and when he reaches his potential? Had discussions similar to this before Neymar joined Barcelona.
 
Yeah some of the hyping is unreal, but he's a top talent and IMO would be among the very best in the next decade given he has his head straight and stays healthy.

Getting him early would save us a lot of dough as well. I'd imagine he'd be valued at 50-60m EUR, another 1 or 2 good seasons and could be double that.

If he fulfills his potential, he will be far out of our reach by then. I don't mean money wise, but by the club he would have joined already. If his preference is Real Madrid as reported, he may already be out of our reach.
 
You could have saved all that time you typed up your post by reading my post again. I am not comparing an 18 year old to experienced players for this season, I specifically mentioned "if put in the correct situation" he has the "potential" to reach far greater heights. As for this season, he's not too bad at what he does at the age of 18, that is stick the ball in the back of the net.

You were trying to argue why we prioritise him over Griezmann, the finished article. You don't pay 100m for pure potential which is what Mbappe is.
 
You were trying to argue why we prioritise him over Griezmann, the finished article. You don't pay 100m for pure potential which is what Mbappe is.
Mbappé is not only potential, he's already one of the very best European players of 2017 young or not, he should no doubt make the shortlist of 2017 Ballon d'Or.
 
Mbappé is not only potential, he's already one of the very best European players of 2017 young or not, he should no doubt make the shortlist of 2017 Ballon d'Or.
Agreed. The difference between Mbappe and other talented young players is that he already plays like an experienced player, his decision making is spot on. He's not a guaranteed success but no player is a guaranteed success so it's a moot point.
 
First of all, reaching far greater heights than the current #3 in the world would be at least on the level of Messi/Ronaldo who are two of the four best players in the history of football. To even mention it about a player who has played 5-6 months of great football is weird imo.

Edit: Death is certain btw lel
Not really, there is such a big gulf between the two monsters and Griezmann. So much that M'Bappé can reach a clear higher level than Griezmann without getting close to them. For them it's not about about 1 season on top of the world like Griezmann (he will unlikely ever reach a top 3 Ballon d'Or level IMHO), they have been at it for a decade.
 
You were trying to argue why we prioritise him over Griezmann, the finished article. You don't pay 100m for pure potential which is what Mbappe is.

No point in trying to discuss something with someone who either cannot read, or understand what was written.
 
He won his last title in Italy without Pirlo or Vidal.
Yeah because AS Roma, Inter, Napoli are that good. Juventus win the league every year with or without Pogba. Pjanic has replaced him easily. He was never by any means the best midfielder in the world, maybe tbe best longshot taker and the most skillful midfielder (even in that, Thiago is probably better).
 
One season doesn't make a world record transfer fee. Let's see how he fares in his 2nd year before drinking the GOAT koolaid.
 
Well, he is playing for a team that can score goals, they can't defend to save their lives but they can score with or without him. And Memphis has only been above average against relegation teams like Nancy, Lorient or Metz. So no he isn't smashing anything and he shouldn't be used as an example to knock the league.
certainly looks like he is smashing it. I hear they call him 'le phénomène' over there
 
Only reason I compared him to Cisse was because Cisse also had half a season where he was world class, not because they're similar in any way
Ah cmon dude there's a difference between just having a purple patch and being a genuinely great striker. People said the same about Harry Kane, bet they wish we paid the 30m now!

I'm not sure what more you want from a striker? His movement is fantastic, finishing is very clinical, add in his superb dribbling and blistering pace. He's an absolute dream!
 
It's not 6 months though, Mbappé has been good from the start of the season but Jardim wanted to protect him after a concussion. But he was playing wide for the most part and was pretty good. He also started his career last year and he was one of the only attacking bright lights with Lemar.
Who do you think Monaco are more likely to sell this Summer out of their attacking players? Silva, Mbappe or Lemar? Think all three of them will generate a lot of interest based on successful season.
 
You have to consider the market inflation. Monaco's reasoning will be that we paid 50-60m (however much per goal, or whatever fecking deal Ed made) for Martial, and Mbappe is wanted by every top club in Europe. We also just paid a world record fee for Pogba.

If we don't sign Mbappe (and I don't think we will), he'll move to Real or Barca, and it'll be for at least 90m-100m. For us, that price would be closer to £120m. An 18 year old contributing to 40 goals in half a season (he was a substitute for the first half) against some elite European teams, is absolutely phenomenal. Makes 18 year old Rooney look ordinary on a pure statistical basis. The guy is putting up Messi type numbers.

Well we've signed Pogba so I won't rule us out of the race. It does seem that he's more Real bound especially with Ronaldo aging.
 
Who do you think Monaco are more likely to sell this Summer out of their attacking players? Silva, Mbappe or Lemar? Think all three of them will generate a lot of interest based on successful season.

I don't know what the players want and I believe that it's the main variable but if I were to guess, Bernardo Silva.
 
Ah cmon dude there's a difference between just having a purple patch and being a genuinely great striker. People said the same about Harry Kane, bet they wish we paid the 30m now!

I'm not sure what more you want from a striker? His movement is fantastic, finishing is very clinical, add in his superb dribbling and blistering pace. He's an absolute dream!
I don't want anything more from him, but I want him to prove his ability for longer than five months before we break the world record fee for him.
 
Well one should wait another season before going big money for him. But he has impressed as much as one possibly can in one season. Doubt we will get him or if we are in a position to spend so much one a young striker right now. To reduce risk and keeping in mind where we are, it's prudent to go for a more experienced striker even though that means that we lose out on a potential superstar.
 
Thing is other clubs might not wait around.
Depends on whether or not a world record fee is required to sign him. If they require say £50-60m then I wouldn't have any issues with it. If they require more than 89m pounds then no club is going to buy him this summer. The only club that could potentially be crazy enough to do it is Man Utd.
 
His goal vs St Etienne and the kinda goals the Brazilian Ronaldo was famous for. A ridiculous calmness in front of keepers in 1v1s in which he'd often skip past them to score in empty goals. He looks nothing like Henry in terms of style for me.
 
We simply aren't in a position to take a risk of this magnitude, the other clubs are. We're talking about potentially half of our transfer budget going to one player's transfer.

No one knows what the transfer budget is or if there is even one.