R'hllor
Full Member
- Joined
- Jun 6, 2013
- Messages
- 15,600
Wonder what Ballbag will say about it,will he use word crazy.
Top 5 clubs in world football don't finish in 6th place in their domestic league, nor spend three seasons out of the last four outside the top 4 in their domestic league.
United are top 5 in the world in terms of money, but no longer in terms of football.
Real Madrid can take the risk buying him at that price.
we can't risk one of our big signings having a below par season.
What the hell will Wenger do now?
He's most certainly a whatever the price type player. It'd be sad if he went to Madrid cause near the end of the Ronaldo era you' think they'd have to Wait for another superstar but here the transition is going to be seem less. I'd stick my neck out and say he'll score 40 goals next season for them.If he goes to United, we would probably have to pay over 250M to bring him to Madrid. For 135M, considering the prices bandied around these days, he would turn to a steal in few years, just like Ronaldo. Perez is itching to get his transfer record back to the point he would prefer to pay 135 then 95.
Never seen anyone as talented as him since Ronaldo R9 so I'm full onboard whatever the price.
I'd stick my neck out and say he'll score 40 goals next season for them.
But the guy doesn't want to come for us... so a bid is not going to change much of that.Just lob in a bid ed
Very high risk. He could be average in a more competitive league and end up going to Madrid for less in a few seasons. He could also be a barnstormer.Any move will depend on the playing time he gets, I can't see real Madrid dropping benzema for him right now. Bench role in any team will put him off at the moment.
Good talent but 135m euros is not worth risk taking on with many youngsters already here. Will he adapt to the league or Jose Philosophy too would be a big question.
Ronaldo era will take 9 years to end with his phenomenal fitness.He's most certainly a whatever the price type player. It'd be sad if he went to Madrid cause near the end of the Ronaldo era you' think they'd have to Wait for another superstar but here the transition is going to be seem less. I'd stick my neck out and say he'll score 40 goals next season for them.
If we hadn't Rashford I think we'd go very hard for this signing. As it is I don't see us being interested.
So using that, you believe spurs are a bigger football club then Manchester united, in recent years?
What? Rashford is good player but right now from what mbappe has a shown his top level will be ballond' or material. I am pretty sure its mbappe who isnt interested in coming here, if he was, we d buy him despite of rashford.
What? Rashford is good player but right now from what mbappe has a shown his top level will be ballond' or material. I am pretty sure its mbappe who isnt interested in coming here, if he was, we d buy him despite of rashford.
Top 5 clubs in world football don't finish in 6th place in their domestic league, nor spend three seasons out of the last four outside the top 4 in their domestic league.
United are top 5 in the world in terms of money, but no longer in terms of football.
He makes perfect sense to Madrid. Perfect age to take over from Ronaldo in 2/3 years with an easy 120+ starts under his belt during his apprenticeship. They don't really need to strengthen much this season so a luxury glactico signing makes perfect sense. They also earned a tonne of prize money these past few years.
What the player wants doesn't matter, if we don't sign him it's a failure of Woody and United.But the guy doesn't want to come for us... so a bid is not going to change much of that.
Spurs havent won jack shit anyway, can go and celebrate the 2nd place trophy. Hate people calling us out for finishing 6th too, we gave up on the league while challenginf for 4th/3rd.But you said that based on result Manchester United haven't been a top team? So surely Spurs who have done better the Manchester United are a bigger team.
You can say "a clubs size is based on results" and then say "you can call Spurs a big team based on results".
Just admit you were wrong in calling Manchester United a smaller club based on results
But you said that based on result Manchester United haven't been a top team? So surely Spurs who have done better the Manchester United are a bigger team.
You can say "a clubs size is based on results" and then say "you can call Spurs a big team based on results".
Just admit you were wrong in calling Manchester United a smaller club based on results
He makes perfect sense to Madrid. Perfect age to take over from Ronaldo in 2/3 years with an easy 120+ starts under his belt during his apprenticeship. They don't really need to strengthen much this season so a luxury glactico signing makes perfect sense. They also earned a tonne of prize money these past few years.
Some of you are nuts to suggest we should blow the majority of our budget on one young lad. We have so many holes in our team and you think the solution is to invest in more potential...
Who cares about holes when you're blowing walls down?Some of you are nuts to suggest we should blow the majority of our budget on one young lad. We have so many holes in our team and you think the solution is to invest in more potential...
I think we could buy Mbappe for half a billion or whatever the feck he's worth now, and we'd still have a dysfunctional team. Then next summer we'd be back at square one, with people desperate for us to throw more money at the next flavour of the month.You don't think Mbappe would instantly solve our DM problem ?
I didn't say that United aren't a top team, nor have I said that Spurs are bigger than United.
I've simply said that in footballing terms United aren't these days in the global top 5 .... and this isn't changed by having a massive income. You're just deluding yourself if you think there aren't - at the very, very least - 5 clubs globally who have a better football team than United.
You said this "Top 5 clubs in world football don't finish in 6th place in their domestic league, nor spend three seasons out of the last four outside the top 4 in their domestic league.
United are top 5 in the world in terms of money, but no longer in terms of football."
So based on that you believe spurs are a top club or at the very least spurs are a bigger club, you are mental, spurs tinted glasses on every post.
Don't tell me what I believe or don't believe.
There are - at the very, very least - 5 clubs globally who have a better football team than United: it's as simple as that. If you think otherwise then let's see your list of the only 4 clubs whose teams are either better or equal to United. Time to put up or shut up.