Summit
"do the dead, spread your seed and get out"
- Joined
- Nov 10, 2011
- Messages
- 51,051
Twitter talk, just like Arsenal.Is there any proof that City actually made a formal bid though?
Twitter talk, just like Arsenal.Is there any proof that City actually made a formal bid though?
Well, £87,000,001 bid to follow then.
The arsenal school of arsenic negotiation skillsWell, £87,000,001 bid to follow then.
87m. Rejected. Jebus. Not sure which one dumber. Monaco or Arsenal. I understand he looked great this season and. But isn't it this is his first season as professional?
There are tonnes of young players out there who look to have everything in this world to become another superstar, but they end up don't.
He is worth whatever clubs are willing to pay.
Is this kid really worth £100 million?
Like really, really worth it?
Seems like such a huge risk.
Is this kid really worth £100 million?
Like really, really worth it?
Seems like such a huge risk.
Every striker out there is being valued at 100M anyways. I would rather go for him now that Griezmann isn't coming. After Neymar and Dembele, he's got a very high potential to succeed in world football. His numbers were phenomenal. Yes, it could be one season but this guy scored a bunch of goals in Europe against the best, that can't be a fluke. Buy him for 100M and keep him for 5-6 years and sell him to Madrid for 175-200M. Simple Math to me.
Is there any proof that City actually made a formal bid though?
Every striker out there is being valued at 100M anyways. I would rather go for him now that Griezmann isn't coming. After Neymar and Dembele, he's got a very high potential to succeed in world football. His numbers were phenomenal. Yes, it could be one season but this guy scored a bunch of goals in Europe against the best, that can't be a fluke. Buy him for 100M and keep him for 5-6 years and sell him to Madrid for 175-200M. Simple Math to me.
There's a huge risk for Monaco here that Mbappé doesn't replicate the same form next season and his value drops to fractional amounts of what's being quoted here. The upside just isn't as great. No matter how good he performs next season his value isn't going to exponentially increase because there's only that much money clubs will spend on a player.
If they are going to sell him in future, might as well do it now and concentrate on developing there squad. It's different if they are thinking long term future with Mbappé leading the line for years to come.
Eh? No it means he thinks that it's well above Mbappe's value. That's why he's not sure if Arsenal are the ones who are stupid for bidding such a high amount or if Monaco are stupid for rejecting such a high amount.If you're not sure which one is dumber, whether you realise it or not you think the price is fair.
Anyone paying £100 million for a young lad with one decent season under his belt is taking a massive, some might say stupid risk.
Second season is the big one because you get targeted, people have watched what you're all about and go out there to stop you and most of all there's a huge difference between performing well as an unknown prospect and doing it when it's expected. Case in point - Anthony Martial, great last year, not this and a lot of that is due to him having to deal with the pressure and living up to the hype.
If we spend £100 million on a player he needs to play. Starting an 18 year old kid in a side which needs a regular, consistent goalscorer next season is madness.
Age is just a number. if you're good enough, you're old enough. I know it's a lot of money that's being thrown around for someone with one season under his belt but we had a punt with Martial who was mediocre at Monaco. All I'm saying is that part of the reason that Monaco went so far in the Champions League and won the Ligue 1 title was because of him. It's not really a risk in my book. If that's the case, maybe we could use Martial in the deal and bring that price down especially since we've been looking for Perisic.
On a side note, I rather have Dembele from Dortmund. I think he's a phenomenal talent.
And if Real splash 40m on a 16 year old and bid another 130m on Mbappe what does that make them?If we spend mega money on 18 year old Mbappe after spending big on Martial with very mixed results then we're officially run by cowboys. Yi-hah!
With people saying he needs to do it consistently so we know he's not a one season wonder....didnt a lot say that about kane
Bit like how Auba would only move to Real. Or that De Gea is bound to leave us to Real.People keep saying he dreams of Madrid when he's never actually mentioned anything of the sort. I'm not saying it's necessarily untrue, but this could very likely be a whole lot of bs journalism as well.
There's a huge risk for Monaco here that Mbappé doesn't replicate the same form next season and his value drops to fractional amounts of what's being quoted here. The upside just isn't as great. No matter how good he performs next season his value isn't going to exponentially increase because there's only that much money clubs will spend on a player.
If they are going to sell him in future, might as well do it now and concentrate on developing there squad. It's different if they are thinking long term future with Mbappé leading the line for years to come.
Or he blows out his cruciate mid-season, nobody wants to buy him while rehabbing next summer, and its not until summer 2019 when he goes on the market again, maybe having never regained the form he just showed this spring.
Monaco really should sell him somewhere given their size and resources.
Of course he's isn't. It's only because he's been so lethal at such a young age so it's a complete anomaly and the recent transfers have allowed the hype around Mbappe to raise his rumoured/potential fee so such heights. He appears to be a special young player. But I do find it amusing how 100 million is attached to just anyone these days - an 18 year old kid, a physical striker in Belotti, Lukaku. It's all very weird. I suppose we've played our part with our ridiculous spending.Is this kid really worth £100 million?
Like really, really worth it?
Seems like such a huge risk.
Agreed, it's mental. 100m for Belotti is complete madness.Of course he's isn't. It's only because he's been so lethal at such a young age so it's a complete anomaly and the recent transfers have allowed the hype around Mbappe to raise his rumoured/potential fee so such heights. He appears to be a special young player. But I do find it amusing how 100 million is attached to just anyone these days - an 18 year old kid, a physical striker in Belotti, Lukaku. It's all very weird. I suppose we've played our part with our ridiculous spending.
I'm not even sure that one is entirely serious given how people speak of him.Agreed, it's mental. 100m for Belotti is complete madness.
Owen looked just as good at 18. Potential was there but a few injuries and a bit of burn out, never quite made it to world class.
Hopefully back-to-back European ChampionsAnd if Real splash 40m on a 16 year old and bid another 130m on Mbappe what does that make them?
Yup, I said this when we got him as well. The way money is flowing into the game, his deal will look like a bargain in a few years if he does well. Prices are going to go absolutely crazy even by today's already ridiculous standards.1 season in football and they are rejecting £87m bids....absolutely insane.
Pogba is going to look like a steal this timer next summer.