Ronaldo's ego
Incorrectly predicted the 2020 US Election
A fine and a few match ban is enough. People wanting to end his career and jail time is ludicrously over the top.
A fine and a few match ban is enough. People wanting to end his career and jail time is ludicrously over the top.
George W. Bush cried when his dog died.That's one crazy person though. I'm sure there are more, but it' still a bit of stretch from that towards your general statement that people in Western societies value pets over people.
That was serious fowl play thoughThat footballer who kicked an owl on the pitch got a two game and fined.
Footballer who kicked owl is hit with ban
www.independent.co.uk/sport/football/news/footballer-who-kicked-owl-is-hit-with-ban-2230959.html%3famp
His point is this incident has had far more attention than racist behaviour.
This has had far too much attention for me but I understand why because it’s been dealt with horrendously. Starting him the day the video came out ffs.
Completely agree.This is what i was talking about. It is only two days in media and you already think that it is too much. I am not blaming you, don't get me wrong but it is general view of our society about animal abuse
The swans agree1) So far Zouma is fined only by his club and only because of public pressure. Uefa so far didn't do shit. Fa so far didn't do shit.
2) Antonio seems as a decent bloke and i know that he suffered a lot of racial abuse but now he managed that one abuse (about which in public is not talked much and neither people see that too much important) becomes secondary now. Racism is no1 topic at this moment regarding Zouma's situation.
Imagine that women step up now (or gay people) and talk about their problems in society? They all can say; "you are all upset about bloody cat but what about us?"
All those cases of abuse are cancer of today's society and society must deal with it but why "steal the moment" of one problem to push up yours? This is huge thing regarding animal abuse. Biggest in recent history (regarding media coverage) and it should be in headlines at the moment
Very good post.1) So far Zouma is fined only by his club and only because of public pressure. Uefa so far didn't do shit. Fa so far didn't do shit.
2) Antonio seems as a decent bloke and i know that he suffered a lot of racial abuse but now he managed that one abuse (about which in public is not talked much and neither people see that too much important) becomes secondary now. Racism is no1 topic at this moment regarding Zouma's situation.
Imagine that women step up now (or gay people) and talk about their problems in society? They all can say; "you are all upset about bloody cat but what about us?"
All those cases of abuse are cancer of today's society and society must deal with it but why "steal the moment" of one problem to push up yours? This is huge thing regarding animal abuse. Biggest in recent history (regarding media coverage) and it should be in headlines at the moment
George W. Bush cried when his dog died.
A fine and a few match ban is enough. People wanting to end his career and jail time is ludicrously over the top.
People have been sacked for similar incidents though. You and I work in different trades but I’m sure we’d both be fired if a clip of us abusing a cat went viral and our respective bosses saw it. I know for a fact I’d be out of a job.People going on about Suarez and other older incidents you do realise they were a decade ago right?
Things have fortunately moved forward since then in football and society in general. They aren’t where they should be but to compare then to now as some kind of proof is naive.
A player found guilty of racism now would be sacked and pretty much lose everything. Rightly so too.
No one with a brain is calling for Zouma to be sacked however it should be obvious to anyone that as a nation of animal lovers what he did was always going to cause an outrage regardless of his ethnicity, which frankly has nothing to do with the backlash he’s received and deserves.
I'm sure some did call for Suarez to be sacked even though that was a time when social media was less pervasive. His point is irrelevant, some random people asking for something on the internet makes no difference, Zouma looks likely to face no real punishment and the fact that he played less than 24 hours later indicates that his actual employer's are not going to react to the views of some people on the internet so the talk of him being sacked will amount to nothing. It came out 2 days ago, it's not like we're still going on about this after 6 months, so of course there's an outrage about it right now. Does Antonio just want people to not talk about it?Suarez is idolised, despite biting opponents and racially abusing 1. No one called for him to lose his livelihood by being sacked. I think that’s his point.
It’s pretty ridiculous now that people step out of line and there’s a mass reaction from people want their livelihoods taken away. Guy should apologise make donation to an animal charity, be taken to court and probably fined. His family shouldn’t be made to suffer for him being a bell and posting unfunny and cruel shite. Hopefully he’s learned his lesson and others will think twice.
People have been sacked for similar incidents though. You and I work in different trades but I’m sure we’d both be fired if a clip of us abusing a cat went viral and our respective bosses saw it. I know for a fact I’d be out of a job.
This is not a thread which shows Caf in good light. But it just reflects society in general. People without "pets" will never understand love and bond which people who have "pets", have with them. They are not pets for us. They are family members for who we will do everything.
"Just a little kick", "you eat meat", "little fine and that is it".......pathetic posts from some of you.
Edit: when my daughter was born, some people around me asked me dead serious; "Will you now throw out your cats?". Like they are some things who you just throw in trash. That is our society
Lucky to escape with a ban and not an actual assault charge for attacking Roy HodgsonThat footballer who kicked an owl on the pitch got a two game and fined.
Footballer who kicked owl is hit with ban
www.independent.co.uk/sport/football/news/footballer-who-kicked-owl-is-hit-with-ban-2230959.html%3famp
Christ.This is such an overreaction.
Have I missed something or do we not still live in a society that's willing to slaughter animals because they taste good?
Should Moyes only start vegans in his team?
Oh boy.The same society that hits horses in races many people attend to bet on also. You will never see this sort of outrage there.
What zouma did was terrible but the reaction he is receiving is as a result of him being black.
So you’d be happy for him to be locked up over this?There are laws against animal cruelty (with jail time up to 5 years), in case you didn't know. Just because you don't care, doesn't mean other people are overreacting.
Too much or not enough?$250,000.00 and loss of income for kicking and slapping a cat...This world has gone full crazy..
Should be locked up for years.$250,000.00 and loss of income for kicking and slapping a cat...This world has gone full crazy..
Kick It Out: Comparisons with racism 'not helpful'
Kick it out CEO Tony Burnett said on Friday: "Zouma's behaviour was clearly unacceptable and I'm sure the RSPCA will thoroughly investigate and update the public in due course.
"We have seen some people draw comparisons between animal cruelty and discriminatory abuse. Both are wrong and it is not helpful - victims are not in competition with each other.
"With any incident of abuse, there should be a fair process and those actions should have consequences. But consequences should not mean complete cancellation. For some people, no punishment is ever enough and comparing incidents will always divide opinion.
"Beyond that, I think it's important to look at the culture within football, and wider society, when it comes to setting appropriate behavioural standards.
"Footballers are public figures, who aspiring players and fans look up to, and some of the behaviours we are seeing aren't setting the expected standard.
"Clubs and the football authorities should also support players to set the right standards of behaviour by addressing incidents like this appropriately."
I don't understand how what @KennyBurner said is so controversial that it should be marked as inappropriate.
There is no question that Western society, especially affluent white people seem to a) value the lives of domesticated animals more than a random human being b) tend to have more critical responses toward mistakes by black people. My family is West African, grew up poor, and never understood the concept of owning pets, so for them, the outrage is weirder than the misdeed. I know older black people in America who hate dogs because they were weaponized by the police in poor black communities. This is a more nuanced subject than just finger pointing.
Not that it matters but I think what Zouma did is shitty and I personally like pets but the posters engaging in whataboutism with regards to race shouldn't be grounds for banning. Thoughts like these are simply the reality of being a person of color in Western society.
In the US it was the same with Michael Vick, but it's impossible to get non-black people to understand this point of view.
I find spaying and neutering animals..more cruel and inhumane..
Pretty sure you wouldn't be fined that much for something as trivial as physical abuse.$250,000.00 and loss of income for kicking and slapping a cat...This world has gone full crazy..
I find spaying and neutering animals..more cruel and inhumane..
I guess people can pick bits from that that suits what they want. Especially in terms of degree of punishment.
But the paragraph that reinforces what many have said on here is:
"We have seen some people draw comparisons between animal cruelty and discriminatory abuse. Both are wrong and it is not helpful - victims are not in competition with each other."
That's the main point many keep trying to stress, that there's all kinds of victims and all forms of abuse deserve to be highlighted and condemned. And this story is about animal abuse. So let those victims 'have a voice' for once. It's nice to see the CEO of Kick It Out acknowledging that rather than taking the Antonio approach.
The race card it's expiring , dude.
It was actually Chris Kirkland who initially compared animal abuse and racism, claiming that animal abuse is worse so it’s funny that you label it the Antonio approach.
I guess people can pick bits from that that suits what they want. Especially in terms of degree of punishment.
But the paragraph that reinforces what many have said on here is:
"We have seen some people draw comparisons between animal cruelty and discriminatory abuse. Both are wrong and it is not helpful - victims are not in competition with each other."
That's the main point many keep trying to stress, that there's all kinds of victims and all forms of abuse deserve to be highlighted and condemned. And this story is about animal abuse. So let those victims 'have a voice' for once. It's nice to see the CEO of Kick It Out acknowledging that rather than taking the Antonio approach.
I think if u gave the cat the option ....he would take the kick...9 times out of 10I'll grant you that the reason why it's necessary to do it is human folly, i.e. an unnatural situation created by humans. But given that situation has been created it absolute is not "more cruel and inhumane" than just letting litter after litter of kittens lose on the streets.