shaky
Full Member
- Joined
- Jan 6, 2014
- Messages
- 2,515
Never heard of reincarnation? Think before you post.How would a human be a victim of animal cruelty? Think before you post.
Never heard of reincarnation? Think before you post.How would a human be a victim of animal cruelty? Think before you post.
Yes. I do agree with that. As I say punishments here rarely fit the crime, from this, racism, rape, child abuse.Isn't that his point?
Never heard of reincarnation? Think before you post.
That’s my view on it.
Because they’re focused on a Rooney stamp from 2006, obviously!Why don’t the FA step in and suspend him?
Can't say I disagree.Then they have to bring more stringent punishments for racism. Social media companies have help fuel a lot of this. They should also be held culpable. A lot of punishments here are far too lenient.
The world was a different place then.Because they’re focused on a Rooney stamp from 2006, obviously!
Why did Antonio bring racism into the discussion at all? He asked the reporter if animal abuse was worse than racism, as if the answer is meant to be an obvious no. Is the answer an obvious no? Is being racist worse than abusing animals?
No, no. He's entirely wrong. Firstly, whether Zouma has been a victim of racist abuse or not is irrelevant to what punishments, sanctions, charges he should receive for a totally unrelated incident.
If we're talking about press reaction, the reaction to footballers getting abuse on social media has been a far bigger news story than this, and still continue to be even though it's been happening regularly, deluded to suggest otherwise.
Suarez banned for 8 games, Cavani 3, the Czech guy against Rangers got about 10. And many more instances where players were rightly banned for racism. How many games has Zouma been banned for? So football doesn't care about animal abuse is the conclusion there. Depends which punishments you focus on / ignore.No one said it did. Antonio is someone who has been the victim of racist abuse, and he is pointing out clear double standards.
Zouma fined 250k, UEFA fines a club less than 25k for repeated incidents of racism?
He is merely pointing out that football doesn't care about racism
It's actually not.
Calls for Zouma to be sacked, he is someone who has been the victim of racist abuse, and he is pointing out the clear double standard.
Hes not saying what Zouma did isn't wrong, he is saying the reaction to what Zouma has done is far and above anything there has been for racism in football.
No one said it did. Antonio is someone who has been the victim of racist abuse, and he is pointing out clear double standards.
Zouma fined 250k, UEFA fines a club less than 25k for repeated incidents of racism?
He is merely pointing out that football doesn't care about racism
He also said he doesn't condone what Zouma has done, but why should Zouma be sacked when other players are still playing after racist abuse, is what he was asking. That would imply the media thinks animal cruelty is worse, hence his question.
I still don’t get it though, most sane people condemn racist abuse and do all we can to stop it, all the campaigns mass protests in cities. All got positive media coverage. People found guilty of racist abuse are almost all handed bans from their respective clubs. Racism is wrong on every level.
Animal abuse is a criminal act, illegal and prosecutable. I’m pretty sure if it was a white player slapping an animal and kicking it across a room in front of their kid the papers would be all over it.
Bizarre reaction from Antonio. We shouldn’t punish animal cruelty? Not sure the point he is trying to make here. West Ham really showing poor leadership.
I'm not sure if you're joking but I hope so. What a weird way for the conversation to goNever heard of reincarnation? Think before you post.
Suarez banned for 8 games, Cavani 3, the Czech guy against Rangers got about 10. And many more instances where players were rightly banned for racism. How many games has Zouma been banned for? So football doesn't care about animal abuse is the conclusion there. Depends which punishments you focus on / ignore.
His point is this incident has had far more attention than racist behaviour.Bizarre reaction from Antonio. We shouldn’t punish animal cruelty? Not sure the point he is trying to make here. West Ham really showing poor leadership.
Is that not appropriate?If you listen to what he said, he was specially speaking on the call for Zouma to be sacked, which would obviously be far worse then any punishment you just mentioned
His point is this incident has had far more attention than racist behaviour.
This has had far too much attention for me but I understand why because it’s been dealt with horrendously. Starting him the day the video came out ffs.
His point is this incident has had far more attention than racist behaviour.
This has had far too much attention for me but I understand why because it’s been dealt with horrendously. Starting him the day the video came out ffs.
Ask him mate.American cities were being burned down for 6 months straight after the death of George Floyd. How can you say racism doesn't get much attention? Every political discussion involes dealing with racism nowadays.
While true, if a top level player in the PL made a racist comment on the pitch now I'm certain there would be an absolute shit storm about it and rightfully so. I've no doubt they'd be sacked once it was confirmed.
But people on here are discussing actual punishments, not just what people on social media call for. I was specifically quoting your post comparing the fine for Zouma to a smaller UEFA fine for racism. And you saying that proves football doesn't give out big punishments for racism. I highlighted big punishments they've given out to players in terms of match bans, and pointed out Zouma hasn't received any match ban at all yet.If you listen to what he said, he was specially speaking on the call for Zouma to be sacked, which would obviously be far worse then any punishment you just mentioned
But people on here are discussing actual punishments, not just what people on social media call for. I was specifically quoting your post comparing the fine for Zouma to a smaller UEFA fine for racism. And you saying that proves football doesn't give out big punishments for racism. I highlighted big punishments they've given out to players in terms of match bans, and pointed out Zouma hasn't received any match ban at all yet.
People on social media are always calling for famous, wealthy people - usually footballers or politicians - to be sacked, jailed, etc, when they do wrong. Comparing what's said on there by random people about Zouma, to what official punishments other people get, is completely false. Those people also faced calls to be sacked, jailed, etc, on social media. It just obviously isn't the concluding punishment. And it won't be for Zouma either. So far he's only faced financial punishment. No suspension, match ban, or anything.
Very much doubt that (depending on who it is).
Zouma has been punished and is rightly taking heat at the moment.
In hindsight I understand what he’s trying to say. Maybe he didn’t convey his point clearly.It's surely an issue for West Ham to deal with and any calls for Zouma to be sacked are being derided.
He is a fecking wanker bully for kicking a poor cat though and if sponsors decide they don't want that cowardly thug representing them, who can blame them.
None of this should diminish efforts to tackle racism though. You can understand the frustrations of Antonio if he sees outrage over this but not systemic racism. Ideally we'd kick out racism and animal abuse but sadly the world is full of pricks.
On a side note, that RBS clerk who put that cat in a bin had her life trashed. I wouldn't say Zouma is getting more heat on this cos he's black. That woman was a nobody, not a millionaire footballer.
In fairness, going back to the Suarez case his ban was issued 2 months after the offence, largely due to the investigation procedure. In fact, he played in 10 league games after the incident.But people on here are discussing actual punishments, not just what people on social media call for. I was specifically quoting your post comparing the fine for Zouma to a smaller UEFA fine for racism. And you saying that proves football doesn't give out big punishments for racism. I highlighted big punishments they've given out to players in terms of match bans, and pointed out Zouma hasn't received any match ban at all yet.
People on social media are always calling for famous, wealthy people - usually footballers or politicians - to be sacked, jailed, etc, when they do wrong. Comparing what's said on there by random people about Zouma, to what official punishments other people get, is completely false. Those people also faced calls to be sacked, jailed, etc, on social media. It just obviously isn't the concluding punishment. And it won't be for Zouma either. So far he's only faced financial punishment. No suspension, match ban, or anything.
Any threads that ends up with race being discussed often end up that way unfortunately.This thread is in the absolute pits
This is nuts. They do a kneel before every game for racism. There's a huge campaign in the PL on the matter and while more can/should be done, it has been taken very seriously. In English football at least (not Italy though it seems?).His point is this incident has had far more attention than racist behaviour.
This has had far too much attention for me but I understand why because it’s been dealt with horrendously. Starting him the day the video came out ffs.
Suarez is idolised, despite biting opponents and racially abusing 1. No one called for him to lose his livelihood by being sacked. I think that’s his point.Bizarre reaction from Antonio. We shouldn’t punish animal cruelty? Not sure the point he is trying to make here. West Ham really showing poor leadership.
1) So far Zouma is fined only by his club and only because of public pressure. Uefa so far didn't do shit. Fa so far didn't do shit.No one said it did. Antonio is someone who has been the victim of racist abuse, and he is pointing out clear double standards.
Zouma fined 250k, UEFA fines a club less than 25k for repeated incidents of racism?
He is merely pointing out that football doesn't care about racism
He also said he doesn't condone what Zouma has done, but why should Zouma be sacked when other players are still playing after racist abuse, is what he was asking. That would imply the media thinks animal cruelty is worse, hence his question.
Yep and that's why I'm not trying to dismiss it out of hand but it is going to sound like a deflection and Zouma is a massive cnut.In hindsight I understand what he’s trying to say. Maybe he didn’t convey his point clearly.
We do have issues with tackling racism but it’s now up to the clubs to hold their hands up and say; look, we’ve got it wrong in regards to historical abuse claims. Obviously the FA should hang their head in shame too.
Saying all that, we absolutely should draw the line under incidents such as these — they’re all vile. Zero tolerance to any sort of serious incidents going forward.
Very much doubt that (depending on who it is).
Zouma has been punished and is rightly taking heat at the moment.
This is what i was talking about. It is only two days in media and you already think that it is too much. I am not blaming you, don't get me wrong but it is general view of our society about animal abuseHis point is this incident has had far more attention than racist behaviour.
This has had far too much attention for me but I understand why because it’s been dealt with horrendously. Starting him the day the video came out ffs.