Klopp Confirmed Liverpool Manager

Status
Not open for further replies.
I am mostly concerned about is his knowledge of german youth and Bundesliga talent. He wint go out and spunk £20-30mill on shite like Brenda did.

Liverpool won't be an issue for this season but a good summer window and he will have them right back up to top 4.

I don't think he's got the ability to make them title contenders though.
 
. Going from first, second to fourth is average? That has to be disappointing with that noyes season being a blip and all.

What are you on about?

We came 1st in 2012/13, a successful season. We then came 7th under Moyes in 2013/14, a disappointing season. Van Gaal came in and expectations were possibly higher than they should have been, but the minimum we expected of him was that he managed to get us back into the CL. He did that, but nothing more, hence it was an average season. Had he won the league it would have been successful, had he given it a good challenge I'd have called it a reasonable success, and had he failed to get top 4 I'd have said it was disappointing.

I expect us to challenge for the league this season, just like I did last season, and the season Moyes was in charge. If we qualify for the CL but don't do much else, it'll be another average season. If we drop out of the CL places, it'll be disappointing. If we win the league, it'll be successful.
 
We were arguing about whether Dortmund was a European force or not, I never mentioned the term 'dominant'. You're changing the subject of the discussion just to suit your point. Those three are indeed the dominant forces in European football right now, but what do you know, there are more forces than only the dominant ones.

Of course the only forces are dominant forces. We don't describe Arsenal as a European force because they always reach the knockout rounds.
 
Of course the only forces are dominant forces. We don't describe Arsenal as a European force because they always reach the knockout rounds.
I guess you didn't really pay attention in physics then.

Anyway, I'm glad I'm not you, life must be tough when you consider anything but the highest achievements as a disappointment.
 
I am mostly concerned about is his knowledge of german youth and Bundesliga talent. He wint go out and spunk £20-30mill on shite like Brenda did.
....
That's probably the greatest strength he will bring to the club. I thinkt that many german players are criminally underrated by PL clubs or they don't know how to approach and integrate them into their teams.
 
I guess you didn't really pay attention in physics then.

Anyway, I'm glad I'm not you, life must be tough when you consider anything but the highest achievements as a disappointment.

Because my attitudes towards professional football reflect every other aspect of my life.
 
That's probably the greatest strength he will bring to the club. I thinkt that many german players are criminally underrated by PL clubs or they don't know how to approach and integrate them into their teams.


Yeah germany has one of the largest talent pools in terms of home grown German youth or Bundesliga players in general. I'm sure in the summer transfer window he will raid the bundesliga for signings.
 
Bild reports he's set to make €10m/year, only second to Mourinho's €13,6/year.
 
Expensive business all round. They have to pay off Rodgers and the rest of his staff. Then next summer they will have to take losses on players Klopp doesn't want. A fair few I suspect.

Madness not to let Rodgers go last summer.
 
What have I tweaked?

Mainz were only in one real relegation battle in the few seasons preceding his appointment there, even having a decent go at promotion in one of them, which is at odds with claims on here that they were battling relegation every season before he got the job.

Mainz were also only in the top flight for two seasons before succumbing to relegation in the third, which again, is at odds with claims that he kept them there for years and years.

People like to harp on about him doing well to get them there for the first time ever, but it has repeatedly been ignored that Augsburg climbed from the 4th tier to establish themselves in the top flight (for the first time ever) without suffering any relegation set-backs at all.

Then we're on to Dortmund. Reaching a single final does not constitute becoming a European force, which is another claim made on here.

There are obvious fundamental disagreements in what constitutes successful seasons here. I don't believe you can call his 5th and 6th placed seasons with Dortmund, or his 4th placed seasons in the second tier with Mainz successful. The bar for Mainz, in my opinion, is set by their promotion and 11th placed finish in their first season in the top flight. The bar for Dortmund set by their success domestically and reaching a CL final.

I'll repeat myself again because this seems to be getting ignored every time I get a response. Klopp is a good manager. He did very well to do what he did with Dortmund, and you can't scoff at winning two league titles, a cup and reaching a CL final. However, this all happened in the space of two seasons, hence my claim that he's enjoyed a very brief period of success.

My point was, and remains, that the success he enjoyed in Germany was easier to obtain than the equivalent in England, and his appointment does represent something of a risk. To get Liverpool from where they are to being title contenders will take some absolutely outstanding management or a tremendous stroke of luck. Expectations are already very high for Klopp. The bar for many is still set very much at Rodgers' 2013/14 title charge and subsequent qualification for the CL. Many will be happy with a top 4 finish, which I think is something that they can realistically aspire to over the next 2 or 3 seasons (including this one) with the right management and the right signings. As soon as that's obtained though, they'll be looking at challenging for the title, which is another step entirely. I will be absolutely amazed if Liverpool find themselves going for a league title any time in the next 3 seasons, never mind finding themselves as double winners and in a CL final. The very minimum expectation for Klopp will be putting up a decent challenge for a CL spot, eventually establishing Liverpool as a CL team. I'm not sure he's capable of doing that.

Yes buddy. Please lecture a Mainz fan how exactly his club has been doing 10-15 years ago. And obviously you know better how to put certain Bundesliga achievements into context than (I think it's now literally) every. single. guy. on. here. who follows the league closely week in week out.
 
Yes buddy. Please lecture a Mainz fan how exactly his club has been doing 10-15 years ago. And obviously you know better how to put certain Bundesliga achievements into context than (I think it's now literally) every. single. guy. on. here. who follows the league closely week in week out.

So you're genuinely going to tell me that finishing 4th, 7th and 9th was the result of a real relegation battle?

We're arguing over the parameters for success, and mine seem to be higher than those of other people, which is fair enough.

And in all honesty, one of the points I've made is that I think Klopp is overhyped, so people telling me he did better than I've made out isn't exactly disproving me, it's just buying into the hysteria as far as I'm concerned.
 
So Klopp has turned into an average manager just because he is taking over Liverpool? He'll turn them around and have them challenging very soon. This is the manager we should have been targeting instead of holding onto the philosophy.
 
So how many on here are expecting Klopp to completely revamp/revitalize this Liverpool squad?

People talk about them getting in the top four but who are they likely to push out? Man City have a really formidable team. Chelsea have Jose and if he leaves I am sure Roman will bring in someone who will improve Chelsea again and if that fails he will spunk the cash again. Arsenal have never dropped out of the top four for a long time and with Arsene in charge I don't see them dropping out of it soon.

That leaves us. Now no matter how much you rate Klopp, you cannot rate LVG so low that you think he will knock us out of the CL places. Klopp will have a heck of a challenge to make Liverpool a part of the top four again on a consistent basis. It was easier earlier but with City riding on the Sheikh's money to turn into title contenders from relegation fodders, but the task for Klopp now is very very difficult.
I have no idea. I just remember back in 2008 when he took over Dortmund, that I gave him no chance to turn that mess around. And I felt pity for him as I thought he deserved a better start into his career after Mainz.

But he did turn it around, in a pretty convincing way. Some might still not acknowledge it, but taking over Dortmund in 2008 was like volunteering to captain the Titanic AFTER it hit the iceberg. After those heydays under Hitzfeld ended in 1997, Dortmund had exhausted 8 or 9 managers in only 10 years. And that is including the rather stable 4 years with Sammer in charge.
 
One must also mention that Klopp had a great understanding with executive staff in Mainz and Dortmund. He won't have it the same way in Liverpool, but I guess that he will do his best to maintain a smooth relationship with other people who are involved in the club. So once he signs there shouldn't be any public frictions with the executives or dof. In general I think that is a good trait for longterm success.
 
@Alex99 so on Friday you posted this:


This would indicate that you regard Klopp as a manager whose reputation is too good for the Liverpool job. It may even suggest you rate the guy. A reasonable inference?

Less than a week later, following Liverpool's very strong links to Klopp, you're engineering arguments to now suggest that Klopp isn't particularly impressive.

Flip-to-the-flop on Klopp?
:lol:
 
I actually quite like Klopp, which is a shame, as I invariably end up disliking 99% of Liverpool managers. They end up drinking Rawk kool aid as soon as they walk through the door and become more detached from reality as every day passes. The only one I still thought well of was Roy, and that's probably because all the pool fans hated him so much it became funny.
 
So you're genuinely going to tell me that finishing 4th, 7th and 9th was the result of a real relegation battle?

We're arguing over the parameters for success, and mine seem to be higher than those of other people, which is fair enough.

And in all honesty, one of the points I've made is that I think Klopp is overhyped, so people telling me he did better than I've made out isn't exactly disproving me, it's just buying into the hysteria as far as I'm concerned.

See the thing is I don't claim to have intimate knowledge of Mainz' situation before he took over. But if you look a bit deeper than their wikipedia page you can see that they were on a relegation spot 5 matches before the end in that season where they came 9th, meaning before he took over it was: relegation battle -> midtable -> relegation battle -> relegation battle.
Sure you can say that Klopp is overhyped by Bayern fans. You can say that your definition of success is so far away from reality that even turning bottom (half) teams into top teams is expected but that doesn't make it sound any more reasonable.
Why not just go with something less ridiculous like saying that Klopp's success lies in the past, things change quickly in football and that working in a different football culture is a completely new task for him.


Very good news if he's going to bring his backroom staff in.

That had to be expected. They said numerous times that him and his number two (Buvac) will stick together.
 
Considering how they were only recent additions to the backroom staff, it's hardly surprising they are being let go. Big difference from letting go backroom staff that has been involved for 5+ years.
 
Appreciate the help with codes for getting Kloppy's first name right, I can probably cope with Alt 0252 or jüst not bother, but have you seen the state of the Bosnian assistant's name? It's an absolute minefield.

Željko Buvač What are those?

:eek: :eek: :eek:

And it'd be best if Jamie Carragher is never allowed to know he exists. Not even for the purposes of informal games of Scrabble, (38).
 
What people shouldn't forget though is that German clubs work with a DoF and signings are mostly a team decision between that guy and the coach. So you can't expect Klopp to deliver Dortmund's scouting network or necessarily establish a new one at Liverpool.
 
So you're genuinely going to tell me that finishing 4th, 7th and 9th was the result of a real relegation battle?

We're arguing over the parameters for success, and mine seem to be higher than those of other people, which is fair enough.

And in all honesty, one of the points I've made is that I think Klopp is overhyped, so people telling me he did better than I've made out isn't exactly disproving me, it's just buying into the hysteria as far as I'm concerned.

The point is, you're a guy who has maybe caught a dortmund game once in a blue moon in the CL on the telly - and constantly has to look up his next argument online - trying to tell those who have followed his teams intimately over many years (both rival fans and supporters) what his achievements really mean.

It makes you look like an absolute internet whopper.
 
Mueller annoys me even more than Muller, but I guess that's because I'm not a native German speaker. We always pronounce our u's like you guys do with a ü. I'm happy it's easy to type on our keyboards though!

Annoying or not, Mueller and Juergen Klopp are their names. Muller and Jurgen are not their names. I like to be obnoxious, by the way.
 
So Klopp has turned into an average manager just because he is taking over Liverpool? He'll turn them around and have them challenging very soon. This is the manager we should have been targeting instead of holding onto the philosophy.

Absolutely despise posts like this, hardly anyone I have seen here has called him average. A large majority of fans are not pleased that he is joining Liverpool and there are some others who are questioning whether his record was actually as good as it is projected to be. No one is actually calling him average or anything close to average. The second part of your post is even worse, when United appointed LVG I don't think Klopp was available, the club was in 7th so obviously we couldn't have waited for him to become available before deciding our manager. We got in Lvg and people may or may not like him but he got us back into the cl, now so when Klopp became available are you genuinely suggesting that United should have sacked LVG and got Klopp in? I think most people at United like Klopp but it's unfortunate that the timing of our need didn't match his availability.
 
Both are, but both are still very good.

Mourinho is obviously excellent at offering teams success in the short term, but we've seen now at a number of clubs that he struggles after a finite amount of time. I think he's overrated because despite these obvious shortcomings, he was touted by many as the perfect appointment to rebuild United. Mourinho doesn't do rebuilding. He comes in when the majority of the groundwork is done, finishes the job, then leaves.

If Pep can do it a club that's not already one of, if not the best in Europe in terms of playing staff, then I'll no longer consider him overhyped. He's had two jobs where he's had to do very little in terms of squad building, so as with Mourinho, it seemed extremely odd when people were talking about him as the perfect man to come in and rebuild United.

So they're both overrated because you don't see them fit to take over United?

Oh and Pep did very little in terms of squad building. Apart from kicking out 7-8 players and bringing in 6 new ones other than the youth players in his first season.
 
What team do Liverpool fans reckon he'd play if he goes?

We know he prefers a 4231 system
Two attacking full backs
Wide men to find pockets, whilst full backs play high up
Target man up top
2 holding midfielders (playmaker, destroyer/box to box)


I'm thinking something like:

Mignolet
Clyne - Skrtel - Lovren - Moreno
Henderson - Milner
Sturridge - Coutinho - Lallana
Benteke

Which would like something like:

Mignolet
Skrtel Lovren
Henderson Mliner
Clyne Coutinho Lallana Moreno
Sturridge
Benteke



Attack

Think he'll use Sturridge like how he used Aubamayang, where he'll want him to make runs in behind Benteke, who can hold up play pretty well. Not sure Sturridge will be happy with this, as he left Chelsea to play up top, but if there's anything that maybe lets Sturridge down, it's his ability to be contest for balls in the air and hold play up, i.e. Benteke, Lewandowski, Ibra, etc. I can imagine he'll still get plenty of games up, though. That would leave the likes of Lallana and Coutinho to get on the ball and look to find the runs in behind.

If he's going for more of a counter attacking option, he might go with Ibe on the right to give some with, with Sturridge up top.

Midfield

Ideally, I don't think he'll like a midfield combination of Milner and Henderson. However, he hasn't really got anyone else. The two will suit his pressing game, but on the ball, neither of them are particularly great on the ball and known for their playmaking abilities. A player like Gundogan would be perfect next to Henderson. It'd be very similar to that of a Bender-Gundogan partnership. Very much doubt Liverpool will get him, though.

Defence

Think Clyne and Moreno will be fine, although the latter struggles with positioning. Think this is where the two holding midfielders will be used to cover them, whilst they play high up the pitch. Don't think Skrtel and Lovren will be asked to play from the back as much were under Rodgers, although the latter was known for his ball playing abilities at the back. This is where Benteke comes in to it because he's very good at winning aerial duels. Actually, so far this season, on average, in 6 appearances, Benteke (8.5) has won the most amount of aerial duels in the EPL.


If Klopp gets the job, it'll be interesting to see what he'll do with them, but from how he's played at Dortmund, I assume it might be something similar to the team I've posted above.
 
Absolutely despise posts like this, hardly anyone I have seen here has called him average. A large majority of fans are not pleased that he is joining Liverpool and there are some others who are questioning whether his record was actually as good as it is projected to be. No one is actually calling him average or anything close to average. The second part of your post is even worse, when United appointed LVG I don't think Klopp was available, the club was in 7th so obviously we couldn't have waited for him to become available before deciding our manager. We got in Lvg and people may or may not like him but he got us back into the cl, now so when Klopp became available are you genuinely suggesting that United should have sacked LVG and got Klopp in? I think most people at United like Klopp but it's unfortunate that the timing of our need didn't match his availability.

Sacking van Gaal for Klopp would have looked extremely clueless anyway. First you hire a guy who says: [hyperbolic] "I want you to have 65%+ possession or die trying" and hammers that thinking into the minds of his players then you replace him with a guy who says "feck possession, gegenpressing is my best #10".
 
What team do Liverpool fans reckon he'd play if he goes?

We know he prefers a 4231 system

That's not really true. Iirc he preferred at 4321 when Mainz were playing in the Bundesliga. With Dortmund he played a 433 on occasion (for example against Bayern and City I think). Especially towards the end of the 13/14 season he switched formations a lot. Trying 433, and asymmetrical stuff that's not that easy to categorize. If I remember correctly he also tried a 442 during his last summer pre season with Dortmund and began that season with a midfield diamond. It was only until all the injuries came and they got deeper into the crisis that he reverted to using 4231 all the time. Probably in an attempt to create some stability by letting the team (and Kagawa especially) play what they were most used to.
 
What is the difference between 4-3-3 and 4-3-2-1?`

Glad to hear he is open to using a diamond. Think that's the only formation that players our best players in something close to their best positions.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.