Sassy Colin
Death or the gladioli!
Do you have a county team Colin?
Who else could it be?
United & Lancashire la la la...
Do you have a county team Colin?
Who else could it be?
United & Lancashire la la la...
Freddie had another set-back today, would probably be for the best if he just retired now and went into commentating and drinking full time.
Nasser Hussain made the point that Pietersen should have taken the opportunity to have played lower grade cricket for a game or two in order to regain his form, as he has not played a lot of cricket lately.
Have they said whether he'll play in the game tomorrow, I see that as being unlikely as it's a three day game
Bit rich coming from you, being someone who always posts a line and almost never substantially backs it up. Everyone assumes you know something because you've made a million posts on this forum, but no one's actually seen you argue a point... occasionally you provide some shit one liner.
He and his county are having some kind of lovers tiff at the moment aren't they?
I don't even recall any posts by you Zong. You may as well not exist. . . Hang on, you're that Chelsea fan, aren't you?
Sorry for hurting your feelings, though.
xxxxx
Does Warne really strike you as someone who says things he doesn’t really mean? hes as blunt as they come and whether hes friends with Pietersen or not it wont make a jot of difference to his views on the game as an observer
Possibly the worst comeback you could've come up with. It was so shit I slightly laughed at how pathetic it was. Cringe-inducing.
The captaincy + peter moores thing and then the injury really has set him back big time. It's really weird, he is such a brash, in your face, confident guy, but now is struggling to back himself.
To me(I am no big expert) he is thinking too much at the crease, instead of being his typical see it, and hit it self
Read this -Instead of a couple of green smilies, how about you refute his claims? well?
And then this -Bit rich coming from you, being someone who always posts a line and almost never substantially backs it up. Everyone assumes you know something because you've made a million posts on this forum, but no one's actually seen you argue a point... occasionally you provide some shit one liner.
Pietersen's average is sub-50 against all of the proper test playing countries barring Australia. He has an average of 68 against Bangladesh and 57 against West Indies, who are both rather crap(in the case of Windies, rather crap since he started playing).
His average when you consider playing away is even poorer with an average of 40 in India, 43 in NZ, 33 in Pakistan, 25 in South Africa, 25 in Sri Lanka.
Now granted that I don't follow cricket much anymore, but yes, he does strike me exactly the kind of man who'd say things that he doesn't mean. The guy was a fantastic player, quite possibly the best bowler of all times, but as a person, he's retarded.Does Warne really strike you as someone who says things he doesn’t really mean?
I don't think there's a single player in that list who is not a better player than him by miles (some by light years).On his day, he's certainly not the finest batsman in the world. There are plenty of people who're more classy on their day and have shown it more consistently. Sachin Tendulkar, Rahul Dravid, Virender Sehwag, Ricky Ponting, Michael Clarke, Michael Hussey, Kallis, Amla, Smith, De Villiers, Jayawardene, Sangakarra are all at least as good as him, and some notably better.
I have. I could name 50 batsmen who "KP" is not fit enough to lace the boots of.I can't argue with the poster who said he's one of the most destructive guys to have played the game -- I haven't seen cricket long enough for that.
One is an English legend, and the other is his best friend.(Botham/Warne to name 2)
(including tons against every major playing nation home and abroad)
One is an English legend, and the other is his best friend.
Plus look at those world class averages. He should thank Bangladesh and the West Indies for the fact that he has an average of 50.
Because I was talking about the part of his post where he said that "KP" has a test century in every major test playing country?Why did you leave out the last Australian Ashes, where he averaged just 54 against a side in irresistible form whitewashing England in the process?
Because I was talking about his post where he said that he has a test century in every major test playing country?
I'm really sorry about that, it was a mistake. He doesn't even have an average of 50.But then you made the comment "He should thank Bangladesh and the West Indies for the fact that he has an average of 50"
especially when he's proved himself away against the best
One is an English legend, and the other is his best friend.
And look at those world class averages. He should thank Bangladesh and the West Indies for the fact that he has an average of 50.
Not to mention that he has a strike rate of 87 in ODIs. Hardly destructive, let alone one of the most destructive batsman of all times.
I don't know if that Afridi guy is still playing, now he is destructive. Him, that fat Indian opener, Gayle, Klusener, Jayasurya, they are destructive.
I know, and he hasn't, in South Africa and Sri Lanka, like shown in that image. He doesn't have one in Bangladesh either.Tons as in hundreds scored, he has scored hundreds in every major test country in the world, half decent players dont do that.
I'm really sorry about that, it was a mistake. He doesn't even have an average of 50.
Am I missing something? Take out the West Indies and Bangladesh, and his average drops by 3.
Is an average of 45 and 16 centuries at an age of 31 really that fantastic?
Like I said - fighting with, and undermining his own team mates.you should read his views on former Ozzie coach John Bucanen and captain Steve Waugh.
I'm really sorry about that, it was a mistake. He doesn't even have an average of 50.
Am I missing something? Take out the West Indies and Bangladesh, and his average drops by 3.
Is an average of 45 and 13 centuries at an age of 31 really that fantastic?
I know, and he hasn't, in South Africa and Sri Lanka, like shown in that image. He doesn't have one in Bangladesh either.
You said home and abroad. He doesn't have one IN South Africa, or Sri Lanka.
I don't know if that Afridi guy is still playing, now he is destructive. Him, that fat Indian opener, Gayle, Klusener, Jayasurya, they are destructive.
If he does that, we'll talk about it then. To call him one of the most destructive and finest batsman of all time now, is absurd. Even if he does get 10,000 runs at an average of 50, it's not a huge deal, 10s of players have it, many more will have it by the time he gets there.Pietersens scored 5k runs in 5 years in the game averaging over 50 for 99% of it, in all probability he’ll end his England carear with over 10 thousand test runs and and with it statistically go down as the best batsman in English test match history
Why do you bring up one series again and again? One series is not the be all and end all of a player's career.I don’t see how a man with the records Piertersen has can be described as a ‘half decent player’? also the fact he averages over 50 against what was at the time the strongest cricketing nation in the world kind of gives the impression hes a big match player and far from a flat track bully, when England were getting pumped 5-0 down under KP was averaging 54 against an attack of Warne, Mcgrath,Lee and Clark….
If he does that, we'll talk about it then. To call him one of the most destructive and finest batsman of all time now, is absurd. Even if he does get 10,000 runs at an average of 50, it's not a huge deal, 10s of players have it, many more will have it by the time he gets there.
Why do you bring up one series again and again? One series is not the be all and end all of a players career.
Maybe I'm being too harsh on him, but he certainly is not one of the top 50 batsmen in history right now.
I wasn't talking about you, lovely. xoxoI haven’t once said hes one of the finest batsmen of all time have i
I'm not talking about you, lovely. xoxo
Apologies i misunderstood, still hes only played 1 test series in South Africa and that was straight off the back of 6 months out with an Achilles tendon injury, is that really hard to understand why he was off his game during that series? He does have multiple one day hundreds in South Africa so it proves hes capable of scoring big runs in their conditions.
Pietersens scored 5k runs in 5 years in the game averaging over 50 for 99% of it, in all probability he’ll end his England carear with over 10 thousand test runs and and with it statistically go down as the best batsman in English test match history, I don’t see how a man with the records Piertersen has can be described as a ‘half decent player’? also the fact he averages over 50 against what was at the time the strongest cricketing nation in the world kind of gives the impression hes a big match player and far from a flat track bully, when England were getting pumped 5-0 down under KP was averaging 54 against an attack of Warne, Mcgrath,Lee and Clark….
To call him one of the most destructive and finest batsman of all time now, is absurd. Even if he does get 10,000 runs at an average of 50, it's not a huge deal, 10s of players have it, many more will have it by the time he gets there.
Maybe I'm being too harsh on him, but he certainly is not one of the top 50 batsmen in history right now.
Right laddie, let's get a few things straight here. To start with, what gauge are you using to define your top 50 ever batsmen? The game has changed in many ways since the glory days of batsmen such as Bradman, Hutton, Sobers, Richards, Pollock, Gavaskar et al clubbing non expert bowlers to all parts at a run a ball. In terms of his contemporaries (which is the only fecking gauge that you can use) he is right up there with the very best in the modern game. Only for lapses of mental concentration and the weight of expectancy being placed on his shoulders by the entire cricketing world, KP would averaging 60. Statistics mean feck all. Look at footballing greats such as Cruyff, Zico and Klinsmann. No off them ever scored as many goals in a season as Mick Quinn or Clive Allen. So using your statistical gauge Quinn and Allen should be regarded as above them in the all time greats.
I'd stick to posting massive shit gifs of mobile phones if I was you.
:unclejunior: indeed.
Completely disagree with that. Kevin Pietersen alongside players like Sachin, Lara, Ponting, Dravid, etc? Ridiculous.
^^ This fecked me off by UJ. It's like saying he's not even in the top 50. Is Dravid really still regarded as a better batsman than KP? I'm talking in the last few years? He seemed to score a hell of a lot more runs when he still had the keepers gloves imo. As great a batsman the little maestro is, it would be interesting to see how his run stats stacked up on the sub-continent and off it. KP will rise from this slump in scores and prove both you and UJ to be very, very wrong.Even if he does get 10,000 runs at an average of 50, it's not a huge deal, 10s of players have it, many more will have it by the time he gets there.
^^ This fecked me off by UJ. It's like saying he's not even in the top 50. Is Dravid really still regarded as a better batsman than KP? I'm talking in the last few years? He seemed to score a hell of a lot more runs when he still had the keepers gloves imo. As great a batsman the little maestro is, it would be interesting to see how his run stats stacked up on the sub-continent and off it. KP will rise from this slump in scores and prove both you and UJ to be very, very wrong.
This when he just got out for a first ball duck!I'd stick to posting massive shit gifs of mobile phones if I was you.
:unclejunior: indeed.
Oh dear!Yes, up there with the very best of his contemporaries. You've mentioned some great batsmen. Would you care to enlarge on the etc.
I think you're missing the point I was making zing. Ok, it maybe subject to interpretation who this era's best batsmen are. But KP ranks right up. To state that he is an average batsman and base his ability in terms of runs scored just isn't good enough.
^^ This fecked me off by UJ. It's like saying he's not even in the top 50. Is Dravid really still regarded as a better batsman than KP? I'm talking in the last few years? He seemed to score a hell of a lot more runs when he still had the keepers gloves imo. As great a batsman the little maestro is, it would be interesting to see how his run stats stacked up on the sub-continent and off it. KP will rise from this slump in scores and prove both you and UJ to be very, very wrong.