Kenyon: No more Spending....

Kenyon and United have no rational interest in publicly stating that they're not going to buy anyone else this summer. If that were the case, they would simply not buy anyone without making a public spectacle out of it. His statement the other day is brilliant way of using the press to get out a message: That is, "Don't bother raising your player prices because we spent 33m on Rio. If you do so, then we're perfectly content to look elsewhere".
 
Originally posted by Raoul:
<strong>Kenyon and United have no rational interest in publicly stating that they're not going to buy anyone else this summer. If that were the case, they would simply not buy anyone without making a public spectacle out of it. His statement the other day is brilliant way of using the press to get out a message: That is, "Don't bother raising your player prices because we spent 33m on Rio. If you do so, then we're perfectly content to look elsewhere".</strong><hr></blockquote>


So what he was actually saying is

"We're going to sign more players"?
 
Originally posted by Amir:
<strong>

Then hopefully this is based on Fergie's belief in a couple of good talents we have coming through, like Davis and Webber, rather than the fact the board won't release any more funds with the squad obviously lacking.

I would be delighted if such a scenario was a reality.</strong><hr></blockquote>

Spot on. I have no doubt that Fergie realises we need four strikers - it seems pretty obvious. If we don't sign anyone it will be because we already have the fourth, not that we have run out of money.

Perhaps we should accept that Fergie knows more about the youth team than we do!
 
Originally posted by Davo:
<strong>


So what he was actually saying is

"We're going to sign more players"?</strong><hr></blockquote>

Not necessarily. Just attempting to create an atmosphere in which United could negotiate (should they so choose) without other clubs being able to ask more for their players simply because Man United are interested. We may or may not infact buy any more players (I still happen to think we will), but the fact remains that we do have to create a stable process whereby other clubs don't feel that they can raise their player valuations because we paid 33m for Rio. I think that's what Kenyon was attempting to accomplish by floating that statement in the press.
 
So if you bid for a player, their club are going to think

"Hang on, best not ask for too much for so and so....after all Kenyon said he wasn't going to sign anyone else"

Amazing
 
Originally posted by Davo:
<strong>So if you bid for a player, their club are going to think

"Hang on, best not ask for too much for so and so....after all Kenyon said he wasn't going to sign anyone else"

Amazing</strong><hr></blockquote>

<img src="graemlins/lol.gif" border="0" alt="[Laugh Out Loud]" />

Have to agree - cock and bull theory that Raoul.
 
Originally posted by Davo:
<strong>So if you bid for a player, their club are going to think

"Hang on, best not ask for too much for so and so....after all Kenyon said he wasn't going to sign anyone else"

Amazing</strong><hr></blockquote>

Not quite in that way. For example, after we agreed to a 33m fee for Rio, Souness immediately began using it as a means to raise Duff's valuation.

"It is going to take £20 million-plus. If Rio Ferdinand is worth that money (£30 million) then it must be the same for Duff.

"Traditionally strikers who make and take goals bring in more money so maybe he is worth more money."


We simply can't allow other clubs to hold us hostage over player valuations because they think they can squeeze us for more money because of who we are. Souness' above illustrates why Kenyon would make such a statement.
 
Originally posted by Dans:
<strong>

<img src="graemlins/lol.gif" border="0" alt="[Laugh Out Loud]" />

Have to agree - cock and bull theory that Raoul.</strong><hr></blockquote>


I've never heard such a load of bollocks in my life..

If you bid for a player that player's club are clearly going to discount Kenyon's announcement...as they might be able to spot a contradiction..

Kidding themselves, they really are..
 
so davo are you going to buy anymore players this summer

like ones that will actully get in your starting 11 and improve your team?
 
Originally posted by Raoul:
<strong>

Not quite in that way. For example, after we agreed to a 33m fee for Rio, Souness immediately began using it as a means to raise Duff's valuation.

"It is going to take £20 million-plus. If Rio Ferdinand is worth that money (£30 million) then it must be the same for Duff.

"Traditionally strikers who make and take goals bring in more money so maybe he is worth more money."


We simply can't allow other clubs to hold us hostage over player valuations because they think they can squeeze us for more money because of who we are. Souness' above illustrates why Kenyon would make such a statement.</strong><hr></blockquote>

How would his statement help if you decide to bid for Duff?

Try not to ramble on about nothing in your answer..
 
Originally posted by Davo:
<strong>If you bid for a player that player's club are clearly going to discount Kenyon's announcement...as they might be able to spot a contradiction..</strong><hr></blockquote>

It wouldn't be the first time a chairman used the press as a negotiating tool. It happens all the time. The press speculates about a transfer, and the selling club claim that the player is worth much more than is being talked about in the papers. I'm surprised that you don't agree with this.
 
Originally posted by RUDDY:
<strong>so davo are you going to buy anymore players this summer

like ones that will actully get in your starting 11 and improve your team?</strong><hr></blockquote>

I reckon we might yes..

Whats that got to do with your spending?
 
Originally posted by Raoul:
<strong>

It wouldn't be the first time a chairman used the press as a negotiating tool. It happens all the time. The press speculates about a transfer, and the selling club claim that the player is worth much more than is being talked about in the papers. I'm surprised that you don't agree with this.</strong><hr></blockquote>


Whats that got to do with your chairman telling everyone that you're buying no more players?
 
Originally posted by Davo:
<strong>

How would his statement help if you decide to bid for Duff?

Try not to ramble on about nothing in your answer..</strong><hr></blockquote>


I'm not rambling. ;) I'm trying to be as clear as possible, but it seems that you either disagree or don't understand what I'm saying.

The statement would help because it would gain us leverage in the negotiations. eg..'We can make you an excellent take it or leave it offer for Duff. We would like to have him at United and you're interested in Yorke (plus Cash.' If Blackburn continue to posture over Duff's valuation, we can simply tell them that he's not a critical signing for us and walk away, as well as pull Yorke's availablity off the table.
 
Originally posted by Davo:
<strong>


Whats that got to do with your chairman telling everyone that you're buying no more players?</strong><hr></blockquote>

Everything. He's using the press to drive home the point I made above.
 
Originally posted by Raoul:
<strong>


I'm not rambling. ;) I'm trying to be as clear as possible, but it seems that you either disagree or don't understand what I'm saying.

The statement would help because it would gain us leverage in the negotiations. eg..'We can make you an excellent take it or leave it offer for Duff. We would like to have him at United and you're interested in Yorke (plus Cash.' If Blackburn continue to posture over Duff's valuation, we can simply tell them that he's not a critical signing for us and walk away, as well as pull Yorke's availablity off the table.</strong><hr></blockquote>

And yet again

Whats that got to do with Kenyon's speech yesterday?
 
I've tried to elaborate several times. It makes crystal clear sense to me. <img src="graemlins/smirk.gif" border="0" alt="[Smirk]" />
 
Originally posted by Raoul:
<strong>I've tried to elaborate several times. It makes crystal clear sense to me. <img src="graemlins/smirk.gif" border="0" alt="[Smirk]" /> </strong><hr></blockquote>

Lets go through it step by step shall we..

so

1) Kenyon announces that you're making no signings. He doesn't really mean this. He is calling everyone's bluff.

Ok, I'm with you so far, even tho I think you're talking nonsense... ;)

2) He bids for a player.

What have this player's club gauged from his no more player speech, apart from the fact that he's a liar, and how will this affect how much cash they ask?
 
Originally posted by Davo:
<strong>

I reckon we might yes..

Whats that got to do with your spending?</strong><hr></blockquote>

nothing but you seem overly keen to talk about our transfer dealing so i thought i would ask about yours

are you happy with the players brought in so far?
 
Originally posted by RUDDY:
<strong>

nothing but you seem overly keen to talk about our transfer dealing so i thought i would ask about yours

are you happy with the players brought in so far?</strong><hr></blockquote>


Go and start a thread in the football forum then..

I'm far more concerned with learning about Kenyon's fantastic plan at the moment...
 
Originally posted by Davo:
<strong>

Lets go through it step by step shall we..

so

1) Kenyon announces that you're making no signings. He doesn't really mean this. He is calling everyone's bluff.

Ok, I'm with you so far, even tho I think you're talking nonsense... ;)

2) He bids for a player.

What have this player's club gauged from his no more player speech, apart from the fact that he's a liar, and how will this affect how much cash they ask?</strong><hr></blockquote>

It will effect how much cash they want, because they will know that United don't necessarily have to buy the player. We could say no and walk away, (thereby presumably prolonging the negotiations). The other club would then be left with the choice of not selling the player for our offering price, or else lowering their demands closer to what our proposal is.
 
Originally posted by Davo:
<strong>So if you bid for a player, their club are going to think

"Hang on, best not ask for too much for so and so....after all Kenyon said he wasn't going to sign anyone else"

Amazing</strong><hr></blockquote>

<img src="graemlins/lol.gif" border="0" alt="[Laugh Out Loud]" />
 
Originally posted by Raoul:
<strong>

It will effect how much cash they want, because they will know that United don't necessarily have to buy the player. We could say no and walk away, (thereby presumably prolonging the negotiations). The other club would then be left with the choice of not selling the player for our offering price, or else lowering their demands closer to what our proposal is.</strong><hr></blockquote>


See, this is where it all falls down..

The club already know that Kenyon's earlier remark is nonsense,as you clearly are after new players...

So they'll ask you for what they want, just as they would if he hadn't said anything..

You're clutching at straws, and inventing implausible scenarios because you don't like the idea of what Kenyon's words are more likely to mean,

That being, that you're not signing anymore players
 
Originally posted by Davo:
<strong>


See, this is where it all falls down..

The club already know that Kenyon's earlier remark is nonsense,as you clearly are after new players...

So they'll ask you for what they want, just as they would if he hadn't said anything..

You're clutching at straws, and inventing implausible scenarios because you don't like the idea of what Kenyon's words are more likely to mean,

That being, that you're not signing anymore players</strong><hr></blockquote>

In hindsight, I believe that we will not sign any more players. Bear in mind that Kenyon made the same statement last season after Veron was signed and true enough, no-one came onboard after that except for a stop-gap Blanc to replace the sudden loss of Stam.

Similarly this summer, we won't get anymore players unless a big hole is created ie one of our important players leave.
 
Originally posted by lchk:
<strong>

In hindsight, I believe that we will not sign any more players. Bear in mind that Kenyon made the same statement last season after Veron was signed and true enough, no-one came onboard after that except for a stop-gap Blanc to replace the sudden loss of Stam.

Similarly this summer, we won't get anymore players unless a big hole is created ie one of our important players leave.</strong><hr></blockquote>

That appears to be the size of it..
 
Originally posted by lchk:
<strong>

In hindsight, I believe that we will not sign any more players. Bear in mind that Kenyon made the same statement last season after Veron was signed and true enough, no-one came onboard after that except for a stop-gap Blanc to replace the sudden loss of Stam.

Similarly this summer, we won't get anymore players unless a big hole is created ie one of our important players leave.</strong><hr></blockquote>

Blanc, Forlan ??
 
Originally posted by Davo:
<strong>

That appears to be the size of it..</strong><hr></blockquote>

The most likely possibility of a new player coming to OT is probably the departure of Silvestre - I am a bit concerned about that situation.
 
Originally posted by Davo:
<strong>


See, this is where it all falls down..

The club already know that Kenyon's earlier remark is nonsense,as you clearly are after new players...

So they'll ask you for what they want, just as they would if he hadn't said anything..

You're clutching at straws, and inventing implausible scenarios because you don't like the idea of what Kenyon's words are more likely to mean,

That being, that you're not signing anymore players</strong><hr></blockquote>


I'm not clutching at straws. If you read my initial post in this thread, you'll see that I have his statements as meaning two possible things. 1. He meands what he says, and 2. It's a smokescreen to lower transfer fee expectations.

I've supported point #2 because I'm confident that we will infact buy another player, possibly two in the next few months..especially if we sell Yorke to Blackburn.
 
Originally posted by Raoul:
<strong>

Blanc, Forlan ??</strong><hr></blockquote>

Yeah, supports my "theory" above doesn't it?

Stam out, Blanc in to replace
Cole out, Forlan in

That's probably the only way we will get new players, I'm afraid.
 
Originally posted by Raoul:
<strong>Iwrin out - ???
Yorke out - ???

;) </strong><hr></blockquote>

Johnsen too and don't forget Wallwork (ok ronnie isn't prominent enough to warrant a significant loss).

I know Raoul but Kenyon does not seem to deem these losses as significant enough to warrant purchases. At least that's how I read it from his statements especially about that part where he talks about purchasing "quality" instead of quantity.

It's hard to live with I know and it certainly does make the job of winning trophies a little harder but I'm hoping with the new assistant manager onboard (whom I think is our most important "signing") with better tactics, organization and coaching drills, we'll get our whole squad to play better football.
 
Originally posted by Raoul:
<strong>


I'm not clutching at straws. If you read my initial post in this thread, you'll see that I have his statements as meaning two possible things. 1. He meands what he says, and 2. It's a smokescreen to lower transfer fee expectations.

I've supported point #2 because I'm confident that we will infact buy another player, possibly two in the next few months..especially if we sell Yorke to Blackburn.</strong><hr></blockquote>

If I were you I'd concentrate on #1, as your #2 makes no sense whatsoever..
 
Davo, I think your are blinding yourself to what Raoul is saying. His no. 2 scenario does make sense.

There are a number of reasons he would create a smokescreen by stating that United are not signing any more players this summer.

1. To appease shareholders.

2. So as clubs will not ask for silly money for players that United are interested in.

3. To dampen down speculation in the media so that any negotiations that are presently being carried out for the signature of a player are not creating unecessary pressure on the people involved.

They are three straight forward reasons as to why PK would make a statement like that to the press and not mean it.
 
Originally posted by BHManUNut:
<strong>Davo, I think your are blinding yourself to what Raoul is saying. His no. 2 scenario does make sense.

There are a number of reasons he would create a smokescreen by stating that United are not signing any more players this summer.

1. To appease shareholders.

2. So as clubs will not ask for silly money for players that United are interested in.

3. To dampen down speculation in the media so that any negotiations that are presently being carried out for the signature of a player are not creating unecessary pressure on the people involved.

They are three straight forward reasons as to why PK would make a statement like that to the press and not mean it.</strong><hr></blockquote>


1) Lying to his shareholders? Are you sure...again, they'll soon find out about such a lie and then they won't be happy

2) Yeah as you might have seen, I'm still waiting for a sensible explanation as to the logistics of this idea. It doesn't work

3) So he's making an official announcement to throw the media? Is this more likely than him telling the truth IYO?
 
Cheers BH. I think it's less likely that a fan of the opposition would consider the 2nd scenario likely, because they automatically come into the discussion from a cynical perpective.

For better or worse, the press is a very effective tool when it comes to transfers. The Ferdinand transfer proved that over the past few weeks. Chairmen and managers routinely use the press to publicly negotiate transfers as a prelude to private negotiations.
 
Originally posted by Raoul:
<strong>Cheers BH. I think it's less likely that a fan of the opposition would consider the 2nd scenario likely, because they automatically come into the discussion from a cynical perpective.

.</strong><hr></blockquote>

Or because they're not so desperate for Kenyon's words to be false...

You choose.. ;)
 
Originally posted by Davo:
<strong>

Or because they're not so desperate for Kenyon's words to be false...

You choose.. ;) </strong><hr></blockquote>

I'm neither desperate for them to be true or false. Just stating my opinion on this statement. I'm quite confident that we can do the business with the squad that we have now, though we could do with more depth at LB and Striker.
 
Originally posted by Raoul:
<strong>

I'm neither desperate for them to be true or false. Just stating my opinion on this statement. I'm quite confident that we can do the business with the squad that we have now, though we could do with more depth at LB and Striker.</strong><hr></blockquote>

Course you're not..

We'll see what happens...

You clearly can't recognise the nonsense that is your theory.. ;)