Keane on Haaland

Originally posted by An Extremely Boring Man:
<strong>

So basically Stevie, you've shagged both Dalglish and Rush

You queer bastard</strong><hr></blockquote>


no midlands, basically i am incapable of giving birth due to not having a womb. :rolleyes:

you are riled about this one, aren't you? if i were schmeichel, i'd have sued wright. pre-meditated. lawyers however didn't play such a prominent role in football back then. haaland can and probably will sue the idiot keane, and has got the benefit of this book to serve his case. . .
Click to expand...
 
Originally posted by michael owen's mum:
<strong>


no midlands, basically i am incapable of giving birth due to not having a womb. :rolleyes:

you are riled about this one, aren't you? if i were schmeichel, i'd have sued wright. pre-meditated. lawyers however didn't play such a prominent role in football back then. haaland can and probably will sue the idiot keane, and has got the benefit of this book to serve his case. . .</strong><hr></blockquote>


But what is he gonna sue him for???
Click to expand...
 
Originally posted by Davo:
<strong>Getting a bit ahead of yourself there..</strong><hr></blockquote>

I'd call it knowing you.

Now don't take that the wrong way Davo, you know what I mean.
Click to expand...
 
Originally posted by Dans:
<strong>

I'd call it knowing you.

Now don't take that the wrong way Davo, you know what I mean.</strong><hr></blockquote>

Anyway,

There was a claim of racial abuse wasn't there?

Remind me..
Click to expand...
 
I'm not sure their is a law against intending to injure a player frankly. A pre meditated attack leading to an ABH charge would have to be able to prove that Haaland's injury is as a direct result of Keane's challenge. I think Keano may face some sort of FA Disciplinary panel but I don't think Haaland's got a leg to stand on (ha ha) if it were to go to court.
 
Originally posted by Dans:
<strong>I'm not sure their is a law against intending to injure a player frankly. A pre meditated attack leading to an ABH charge would have to be able to prove that Haaland's injury is as a direct result of Keane's challenge. I think Keano may face some sort of FA Disciplinary panel but I don't think Haaland's got a leg to stand on (ha ha) if it were to go to court.</strong><hr></blockquote>

I'd be surprised if no civil case can be put forward given the evidence on this..I don't think the fact that no long term injury was caused would matter.

Tho, as I said earlier, I'm not sure on this..
Click to expand...
 
Originally posted by An Extremely Boring Man:
<strong>But what is he gonna sue him for???</strong><hr></blockquote>

pre-meditated assault now that keane has admitted in print that he intended it and that it was a deliberate physical assault.

i know that could apply to just about any deliberate foul in football, but most players have the good sense not to write down their thought processes in order to shift a few extra copies of a book they don't need the income from anyway. . .
Click to expand...
 
Originally posted by michael owen's mum:
<strong>

pre-meditated assault now that keane has admitted in print that he intended it and that it was a deliberate physical assault.

i know that could apply to just about any deliberate foul in football, but most players have the good sense not to write down their thought processes in order to shift a few extra copies of a book they don't need the income from anyway. . .</strong><hr></blockquote>

The "assault" would be hard to prove as an assault surely? You know as in as a true assault. Surely Keane could claim he'd got him with another tackle in that match and that the tackle which we all are thinking of was another. I dunno, the law doesn't make it easy to find conclusive proof does it? Reasonable doubt and all that.
Click to expand...
 
Hmm, that sounded ambiguous at best.

Reasonable doubt.
 
Originally posted by RUDDY:
<strong>

so how can he sue for loss of earnings when its his other knee that was injured

it was injured even before the united game</strong><hr></blockquote>

How many games did he miss following the assault at OT? It is those games I am talking about not what is wrong with him now.
Click to expand...
 
Originally posted by Davo:
<strong>

I'd be surprised if no civil case can be put forward given the evidence on this..I don't think the fact that no long term injury was caused would matter.

Tho, as I said earlier, I'm not sure on this..</strong><hr></blockquote>

I just can't see what he can sue him for, especially not in a civil court <img src="confused.gif" border="0">
Click to expand...
 
Originally posted by marchingontogether:
<strong>

How many games did he miss following the assault at OT? It is those games I am talking about not what is wrong with him now.</strong><hr></blockquote>

He didn't get injured at all - if I remember right, he was already injured before the game, finished this game and then had an operation on his other knee
Click to expand...
 
Originally posted by An Extremely Boring Man:
<strong>

I just can't see what he can sue him for, especially not in a civil court :confused: </strong><hr></blockquote>

Intent to injure?

Feck knows, I'm not a lawyer..but I'd be surprised if there isn't something that can be levelled at him..

The media has been full of talk about suing him, have they mentioned anything specific?
Click to expand...
 
Originally posted by marchingontogether:
<strong>

How many games did he miss following the assault at OT? It is those games I am talking about not what is wrong with him now.</strong><hr></blockquote>

read carefully

he has an injury in his other knee not the one keano went for

this is the very same injury that kept him out last season,also even keegan could see he was shite and trid to flog him back to forest

so the injury that has stoped him playing these games has nothing to do with keano
Click to expand...
 
Originally posted by Davo:
<strong>

Intent to injure?

Feck knows, I'm not a lawyer..but I'd be surprised if there isn't something that can be levelled at him..

The media has been full of talk about suing him, have they mentioned anything specific?</strong><hr></blockquote>

The media are playing on the fact that he's injured, and hardly played football after the incident. What they don't say is that the injury has got nothing to do with this incident..

If he's gonna sue for an attempt to injure him, then that would make a case for anytime someone throws an elbow on the pitch, even if it misses the target!
Click to expand...
 
Originally posted by An Extremely Boring Man:
<strong>

He didn't get injured at all - if I remember right, he was already injured before the game, finished this game and then had an operation on his other knee</strong><hr></blockquote>

EXCATLY
Click to expand...
 
Originally posted by MancFanFromManc:
<strong>

Especially when he comes hobbling on the WRONG LEG!

"NEXT" !!!

<img src="graemlins/lol.gif" border="0" alt="[Laugh Out Loud]" /> </strong><hr></blockquote>

The case hasn't got a leg to stand on <img src="graemlins/lol.gif" border="0" alt="[Laugh Out Loud]" />
Click to expand...
 
Originally posted by An Extremely Boring Man:
<strong>

The case hasn't got a leg to stand on <img src="graemlins/lol.gif" border="0" alt="[Laugh Out Loud]" /> </strong><hr></blockquote>

feckin parrot. Get your own punchlines. Baz knows what I mean. Cnut.
Click to expand...
 
Originally posted by An Extremely Boring Man:
<strong>

The media are playing on the fact that he's injured, and hardly played football after the incident. What they don't say is that the injury has got nothing to do with this incident..

If he's gonna sue for an attempt to injure him, then that would make a case for anytime someone throws an elbow on the pitch, even if it misses the target!</strong><hr></blockquote>

Well he's clearly not going to sue him for an injury to his other leg...

The difference being in this instance that Keane has admitted that he set out to get Haaland...this is likely to be treated differently to a thrown elbow that could be put down to the heat of the moment..

We'll soon find out anyway
Click to expand...
 
How many games did Keane get banned for?
 
Originally posted by RUDDY:
<strong>

read carefully

he has an injury in his other knee not the one keano went for

this is the very same injury that kept him out last season,also even keegan could see he was shite and trid to flog him back to forest

so the injury that has stoped him playing these games has nothing to do with keano</strong><hr></blockquote>

So he did not get injured in the assault by Keane? He played on...Right?
Click to expand...
 
Originally posted by Nate:
<strong>How many games did Keane get banned for?
</strong> <hr></blockquote>

As the FA are going to look further into the book and about waht he saod, the question now will be

How many games will Keane get suspended for? <img src="graemlins/nervous.gif" border="0" alt="[Nervous]" />
Click to expand...
 
Originally posted by marchingontogether:
<strong>

So he did not get injured in the assault by Keane? He played on...Right?</strong><hr></blockquote>

no he was not injured in that challenge
Click to expand...
 
Should Scholes sue Tervez then? Or just perhaps the red card is sufficient. Scholes could have had a broken cheekbone, or loss of sight. It was blatant revenge and their players talked about how pissed off they were with Scholes' hard tackling.

We have red cards, I'd rather we left it at that rather than have the 'sue for money' culture spread to football. Especially since they're all so adept at faking injury anyway.
 
Originally posted by Davo:
<strong>

Well he's clearly not going to sue him for an injury to his other leg...

The difference being in this instance that Keane has admitted that he set out to get Haaland...this is likely to be treated differently to a thrown elbow that could be put down to the heat of the moment..

We'll soon find out anyway</strong><hr></blockquote>

Dont know why you're so against Keano. It must be an envy thing.

I thought you'd have appreciated the way he stopped to have picture taken with two kids in scouse shirts at the airport (as shown on SKY earlier!)
Click to expand...
 
This is such a non-story it is untrue.
It was obvious that Keane lost the plot against City that day. It was obvious who he took it out on. So it should have been obvious when the FA dished out their original ban at the disciplinary hearing.

Just because we have read an extract from a book that looks to me like Keane has said what was running through his mind at the time doesn't mean the whole affair is up for debate again. I bet when the book finally comes out there will be a note of remorse from Keane about the whole incident and the FA will lose interest.

As for Haaland, I don't think he has a leg to stand on in court. <img src="graemlins/lol.gif" border="0" alt="[Laugh Out Loud]" />
 
Originally posted by MancFanFromManc:
<strong>

Dont know why you're so against Keano. It must be an envy thing.

I thought you'd have appreciated the way he stopped to have picture taken with two kids in scouse shirts at the airport (as shown on SKY earlier!)</strong><hr></blockquote>

I don't know why you're so intent on defending him when he's clearly in the wrong..
Click to expand...
 
Originally posted by An Extremely Boring Man:
<strong>Apparently Diuof is suing Vieira after he had to dive over the Frenchman's legs</strong><hr></blockquote>

<img src="graemlins/lol.gif" border="0" alt="[Laugh Out Loud]" /> <img src="graemlins/lol.gif" border="0" alt="[Laugh Out Loud]" /> <img src="graemlins/lol.gif" border="0" alt="[Laugh Out Loud]" />
Click to expand...
 
Right, so court case apart (if there is actually going to be one)

Is 4 games enough punishment for a player who admitted to trying to end another ones career on the basis of a vendetta?
 
Originally posted by Davo:
<strong>

I don't know why you're so intent on defending him when he's clearly in the wrong..</strong><hr></blockquote>

maybe its because hes a united player and every thing hes done for us over the years

i'll back him to the hilt whatever like eric
Click to expand...
 
Originally posted by MancFanFromManc:
<strong>

Dont know why you're so against Keano. It must be an envy thing.

I thought you'd have appreciated the way he stopped to have picture taken with two kids in scouse shirts at the airport (as shown on SKY earlier!)</strong><hr></blockquote>


You must be new to this board

Davo's mission in life is to focus on everything negative about Man United
Click to expand...
 
Originally posted by RUDDY:
<strong>

maybe its because hes a united player and every thing hes done for us over the years

i'll back him to the hilt whatever like eric</strong><hr></blockquote>

Lets hope he doesn't slit his throat then to make sure he finishes the job.
Click to expand...
 
Originally posted by Nate:
<strong>Right, so court case apart (if there is actually going to be one)

Is 4 games enough punishment for a player who admitted to trying to end another ones career on the basis of a vendetta?</strong><hr></blockquote>

Probably not

Are you gonna sue the FA?
Click to expand...
 
Originally posted by An Extremely Boring Man:
<strong>


You must be new to this board

Davo's mission in life is to focus on everything negative about Man United</strong><hr></blockquote>

As you lot focus on everything positive.

Never anything wrong with your lot eh?
Click to expand...
 
Originally posted by Nate:
<strong>

Lets hope he doesn't slit his throat then to make sure he finishes the job.</strong><hr></blockquote>

yea great post that was
Click to expand...
 
You must log in or register to reply here.