Jurgen Klopp Sack Watch

So next season if Liverpool have made the Champions League does Klopp throw the league and concentrate on winning the European Cup or does he try and get eliminated from Europe as soon as possible and concentrate on finishing top 4?
 
So next season if Liverpool have made the Champions League does Klopp throw the league and concentrate on winning the European Cup or does he try and get eliminated from Europe as soon as possible and concentrate on finishing top 4?

Good question.

I am curious to know the answer from the Liverpool fans because that's what Rodgers did the last time they were in it. And they have been happy to get out of the cups this season.

On the topic of cups I think it was a major mistake to go with a B team against Wolves. Given how their form was they should have tried to win it to regain some form. Instead crashing out of it just exacerbated their confidence issues and led to further damage.
 
Think he may need to evolve tactically though. The predictions pre-season was that we'd struggle against the park-the-bus sides. Didn't happen at first but he now seems to be incapable of finding a solution. It goes without saying that losing 4 & drawing once every 5 games isn't acceptable to any club, let alone Liverpool. We've lost the momentum now, so it's going to very tough in getting back on track especially as the likes of United, Spurs, & even City, are building up a head of steam.
Absolutely. I think he can evolve. I will take off my United hat and admit to thinking he is a very good manager, probably among the best 20 in the world right now.

How he responds over the next 2 years will demonstrate how versatile (or not) he is.
 
Not who you replied to, but...

Since 2009 Liverpool have been a 6th-8th placed team. The one exception to that was 2013/14 where they mounted an unexpected title challenge and finished 2nd. Following Benitez's departure in 2010, expectations had been gone from "finish top 4" to "challenge for top 4/qualify for EL" but the Rodgers title challenge put them back to "finish top 4". After they missed out on CL qualification again in 2014/15 and finished the season poorly, the pressure was put on Rodgers to start 2015/16 well and not leave them playing catch up. He didn't start well so was sacked, with Klopp being brought in to get the season back on track and at least challenge for a top 4 spot. He failed to do that, and once again they found themselves without any European football at all, never mind not being in the CL. They've been out of Europe completely just 3 times since 2000, and all of them came from 2010 onwards. The last time it happened, they were a slip away from winning the league, and after looking like Chelsea's most likely challengers come the mid-point of this season, expectations were starting to raise from "finish top 4" to "challenge for the title". 4 games later and they're outside of the top 4 with fans already starting to trot out "if we challenge for the top 4 I'll be happy".

Whilst I'm not sure Rodgers was the man to get them back as top 4 regulars, you have to question the wisdom of letting him spend £80 million on new players in the summer, only to sack him at the start of October. If they didn't have faith in him, they should have dumped him after they finished the 2014/15 season by losing 3-1 at home to Palace and 6-1 away to Stoke, with just 2 wins in their last 8 games, whilst also getting dumped out of the FA Cup at the semi-final stage by Villa.

People keep pointing at the cup performances last season as signs of progress, but for a team who's ambitions are to consistently qualify for Europe's top club competition, being able to challenge on multiple fronts is precisely what they need to do, unless of course they expect to win the CL every season. There's no point qualifying for the competition if you need to choose between trying in it and trying to qualify for it next season, so I'm not really sure why Klopp's held in high regard for losing two cup finals and apparently abandoning the league to do so, and I'm not sure why some have suggested being knocked out of both cups this season is good because it'll benefit their league form. It's all based on pure speculation that in the summer they'll seriously strengthen the squad, when the reality is that they don't really appear to have the transfer budget to do so. Since FSG took over, their highest net spend has been just over £40 million, and in a world where Championship Wolves are buying players for £13 million and Leicester and Watford are rejecting near £40 million bids for players, you simply aren't going to strengthen a team to compete in the league and in Europe with that kind of money.

As suggested, the owners either have delusions of grandeur following 2013/14, or they need to invest a hell of a lot more money in the squad to achieve what they want to achieve. Klopp, as far as I'm concerned, has been no better than Rodgers was for them and hasn't shown anything to suggest he'll be better. If they finish in the top 4 this season, their expectations for 2017/18 should be to do so again whilst also putting in a good showing in the CL, something Rodgers couldn't do. If they don't, they either reevaluate their ambitions and lower them (which I don't think they'll do), or they'll have to seriously consider whether Klopp is the man for the job. He's getting by on reputation at the moment, with people hoping he'll do with Liverpool what he did with Dortmund.

They might not have been wrong to sack Rodgers, and as much as I don't like the guy, you have to feel that he was a bit hard done by to get sacked just over a season after nearly winning the league, only to be replaced by a guy who's basically doing no better another season and a half on.
Great post.
 
Liverpool have a maximum of 14 games in the next 15 weeks. That's a huge boost for a team that plays like they do. Compare that to United, who have as many as 28 more games to go this season. We're unlikely to reach 3 finals admittedly, but 22 to 24 more games is very possible,
Success breeds success. I think a rhythm of winning matches can be beneficial at this stage of the season.
 
I only put this up cos it's something we've all wondered about at some point. It isn't little, btw.

Just a little tidbit from his book that will clear up an issue that puzzled many: just what happened to his shooting power and precision in his later years?

There have been two occasions where Chris helped save my career, and my sanity, when all seemed threatened or lost. In 2011 it felt like my groin and my mind were ruined for ever, blown to smithereens by pain and despair. Chris came to my rescue.
I’d had groin problems my whole career, adductor muscle pain and numerous surgeries on my hernia. My groin, and the gracilis [a small muscle in the inner thigh] release I’d needed, had cost me my place in the 2002 World Cup. It was a chronic issue and I’d already had a revision of a previous hernia procedure to reinforce the lower abdominal wall. But in March 2011 I had suffered a groin avulsion. It’s an injury that’s as nasty as it sounds because, basically, the whole of your groin muscle comes off the bone.
It happened after I did a Cruyff turn at Melwood. I managed to walk off the pitch and get to the treatment room. As soon as I hobbled in, the medical team knew I was in trouble. ‘What happened?’ Chris said, worry lining his voice.
I shook my head. ‘My groin’s just exploded.’
It was a dramatic word, but ‘exploded’ had a measure of accuracy. They soon worked out that I had pulled the adductor longus tendon off at the bone. The avulsion had occurred where my adductor muscle attaches onto my pubic symphysis area.
Your adductor muscle primarily helps when you swing your leg across your body. It is possible for such an injury to heal itself because it can form a new attachment lower down. Some footballers actually play with a half-attached adductor and they get assigned a secondary cleft – a little gap which helps them manage their movements. But as soon as I heard from the surgeon that, if we followed that non-interventionist approach, I could lose power when making a trademark crossfield pass, I was adamant. I wanted surgery. If all went well, the surgeon assured me, the adductor muscle would feel as good as new.
I was happy to take his advice and he also reassured me that Frank Lampard had come back from the same injury. I would be out for twelve weeks but I would make a complete recovery. It ended my season but Chris said he would come out to Portugal with me in the summer. I would be ready to play again long before the start of the 2011–12 season.
It was vital to have a strong core around the groin and adductor area because, in a typical Premier League game, I would run eight miles and a mile of that distance would be covered at high speed. There was always plenty of twisting and turning of the groin and the adductor. Some players believed that massage was the key to everything but our medical team had a strong belief that active rehabilitation, strengthening and hard work were essential in ensuring that the surgery was successful.
I nodded. After the surgery I would be ready to put in as much hard work as we needed.
The operation seemed routine and it left me with a neat four-inch scar. It was another to add to the collection. But we soon hit a problem. I kept suffering from discomfort and, sometimes, pain in and around my pelvis. Chris, the Liverpool doctors Zaf Iqbal and Peter Brukner and the surgeon Ernest Schilders all examined me – and gave the all-clear. It was still early days. I just needed to relax and allow the adductor to heal.
We thought some sun would sort me out. I was longing to get to Portugal and feel back to normal again. Alex, the girls and I went out for our summer break – and Chris took a working holiday with us. We would go to the gym in the morning and evenings to work hard and he would leave me to enjoy my holiday with the family the rest of the time.
It was frustrating. We kept needing to pull back in terms of our targets for the first of July – the day I hoped to start preseason training. Anything as simple as a high knee-step or a lunge would hurt too much. They were the basic exercises we needed to strengthen the adductor.
We devised a new plan that we would pick up the pace at Melwood. I would, surely, be fully rested and recovered by then.

The plan went awry. On my first day back at Melwood, after we’d done some lengthy but gentle warm-up routines, we decided I would go for a little jog. I knew I couldn’t kick a ball but, surely, I could manage a ten-minute jog around the training fields. I had made some progress in the pool and on the alter-g, a weight-bearing treadmill which enables you to jog without placing any stress on your body.
I was looking forward to it, the simple mindless pleasure of being outside and moving one foot in front of the other at a steady pace. I had not run for a very long time.
My feet began to move. One, two, three … and by the time I had taken my ninth and tenth step I had to stop. My face was a mask of pain.
I could not run another step. It was excruciating; and it was frightening.
What was going on? I was a professional footballer and I couldn’t even run ten paces. My operation had been twelve weeks earlier. I was meant to be fit and flying by now.
It was obvious that the medics were also concerned. Part of their job was to study the clinical side and then pinpoint the reasons a player might be feeling pain. Such explanations always helped ease the stress and the worry. But they were not sure what to tell me. All the tests the doctors had since run showed that the surgery had been successful. Yet I still felt completely crippled.
They had explained years earlier that I picked up more injuries than many players because I was hyper-mobile. That meant I had real flexibility around my joints. It was great in the sense that flexibility helped my football. The downside was I was also more susceptible to injury. But my latest injury had apparently been resolved by surgery.
Chris and the doctors studied a new set of scans. They went through each of them in detail with me. They showed me that, when I tore off the adductor, I had also stripped away the ligament underneath the pubic symphysis. That explained why my movement was hampered and it perhaps indicated some instability. It was suggested that the gapping in my pelvic area was causing the pain. There was not much we could do about it except wait for the ligament to heal properly.
A week later, feeling a little better, we had a meeting with all the medics and it was decided I’d avoid running for a while. I’d switch to cycling.
Melwood felt very empty, with the first-team squad away on a preseason tour, but Darren Burgess, the club’s head fitness coach, soon called me. He asked me to do a twenty-four-minute bike ride. ‘Do this one for a physical hit,’ Darren said, ‘and let me know how you get on.’
The plan was to build on that first real test on the bike. Jordan Milsom, a good friend of mine and a top fitness coach, would be there to monitor me and the readings. I climbed on the bike and I began to pedal.
Wow, it was so painful. After two or three minutes, with sweat already beading my brow, and my face stretched into the wrinkly grimace of a very old man, it felt like I was having to ride all the way from Liverpool to the Trafford Centre in Manchester while sitting on a saddle of nails. That’s how agonizing it felt.
After five minutes I gave up. I had to stop. I surrendered.
I left a message on Darren’s voicemail. ‘You cannot put me through that again,’ I said. ‘Something’s not right. It feels serious.’
I was getting lower and lower. ‘It’s not feeling good,’ I told Jordan and Chris. ‘It’s excruciating.’
‘Where exactly are you feeling the pain?’ Jordan asked.
‘Sort of behind the balls,’ I said.
They looked worried.
‘Yeah,’ I said, ‘it feels like someone is trying to knife me behind the balls.’
We didn’t laugh. I was beginning to wonder if I would ever be able to kick a ball again. It had been almost four months since my fateful Cruyff turn. At this stage
I was meant to be ready for a full-scale game. But my body had given up.
The pain was sporadic. I could go for hours feeling fine and then it would suddenly knife me when I was doing something as simple as getting in or out of my car.
‘It sounds like the pain is being caused when you open up the pelvis,’ Chris suggested.
‘Could be,’ I said. ‘There’s something going on between my privates and the middle. There’s something underneath my pelvis. It feels like my pelvis is opening. It’s like a great big gapping.’
Zaf Iqbal and Chris took me back to the surgeon, Ernest Schilders, who had done the operation at the Yorkshire Clinic near Bradford. Schilders was a fine surgeon, from Belgium, whom the club had relied on for years as our hip and groin specialist. I trusted him and I was even more worried when he could not identify any reason for the stabbing pain. We told him about the aborted jog, and the abandoned bike ride. Schilders looked bemused. He again said that he was completely confident the surgery had been successful. Schilders thought we needed a fresh pair of eyes. He suggested I see a pelvic specialist down in London.
It was sounding more and more serious. I couldn’t jog. I couldn’t ride a bike. I couldn’t kick a ball. And there was no chance I could jump up in the air and head it. I wasn’t able to do much at all.
Zaf, Chris and I travelled down by train to London. I had plenty of time to talk to them. They tried to keep my spirits up but we all knew that there was a real danger I might not improve. We had to face the possibility that, over fourteen years as a first-team player, so much damage had been done around the joint that the whole pelvis had been made unstable. Without a supporting structure I was finished as a hyper-mobile player, and probably as any sort of player. As soon as I tried even the most basic movements my whole pelvis felt like it was shearing.
Zaf and Chris encouraged me. Maybe the pelvic surgeon would come up with a simple solution. Perhaps it would be possible to pin the pelvis?
I shuddered when it was explained that it would be similar to putting a bolt through the joint.
Terrific. I didn’t feel good as we met our latest specialist, the pelvic guy, and I waited to hear if he was about to tell me it really was all over. He was very thorough and, after a long examination, he went back to the scan taken that morning.
‘Look here,’ he said, pointing to a shadowy smudge. ‘You’ve got all of this white fluid here. I don’t know how much fluid you should have after this procedure because it’s not one that I do. But you need to find out what’s going on with this fluid. You’d better go back to Schilders.’
We were going round in circles. But, on the train journey back to Liverpool, Doc Iqbal explained that a build-up of fluid usually indicated an infection. It was confusing as he had already carried out a full battery of blood tests for infection. The clearest sign of an infection is a high white blood-cell count and mine had remained normal throughout the long haul. Maybe Schilders would have a brainwave.
An appointment back in Bradford was arranged with Schilders for later that week. Zaf and Chris asked me to rest up as much as possible at home.
The body works in miraculous ways and maybe it decided that my poor old heart and brain had ached enough. It began to do something very strange. The next day, at home, my wound opened a little. It seeped out white, yellowy, gunky pus.
A clean, perfectly stitched scar opened up – less like a flower than a nasty weed with white and yellow buds on the top. What the feck was going on now? I found a cotton wool pad and dabbed it clean. More gunk began to ooze out.
I was so scared of what I saw I took a photo of my wound. I was having a serious panic. I sent the image to Chris with a message:
What the feck is this?
Chris texted back:
This is v good. Will call in 2 mins. This means it really is an infection.
I messaged him –
That’s good?!?
– after sending another photographic update.
Chris called me. I told him that I’d just had to use another pad to clear the next hit of pus.
‘It’s great news, Stevie,’ Chris enthused. I must have grunted dubiously because he quickly explained that my pain had almost certainly been caused by the pus pushing the joint apart. It also caused the sensation of instability in my pelvis. We had been worried that something had become seriously unhinged in the pelvic area. But, instead, the build-up of fluid had caused immense pressure on the joint and essentially forced it apart. No wonder it had felt unstable.
Chris got me back to Bradford quickly to see Schilders and have a repeat MRI scan. It was clear as day, they said, after they had examined the scan. They could see the build-up of pus jammed right between the joint and my pubic symphysis. The apparently normal post-op fluid was probably a raging infection which, bizarrely, hadn’t been picked up by any of the tests.
I began to understand. No wonder it had felt as if I was being stabbed in the bollocks.
While we waited for them to run a test on the pus, to confirm it was the infection they all suspected, Chris took me for a coffee in Shipley, on the edge of Bradford. He was fired up. ‘We need this to be an infection,’ he told me. ‘If this is an infection you’ll be fine. You’ll be sorted.’
I was suddenly desperate. I wanted to be infected. I was praying silently for an infection.
An hour later the results were in and there was absolute confirmation. I was infected. I felt like punching the air. What a result!
Schilders smiled. He understood. He was also relieved. There had been a 1 in 10,000 chance of picking up an infection during surgery. I got the one – and it explained everything. But it was all right. I would go into the Spire, a hospital in Liverpool, and spend a week recovering. They would pump me full of antibiotics and kill off the infection.
There was a chance I would be playing again in late September 2011, early October at the latest. I could not stop smiling as I headed off to hospital for a week.
I had no idea then I would soon feel far lower than I’d ever done before. Yet another mysterious injury, and a deep depression, loomed over me. The worst was on its way.
At first there was only good news. In hospital my pain diminished rapidly. The pus had been drained away and I felt a noticeable improvement in my movement every day. My recovery had begun.
Within a week of getting home I was back at Melwood. I was able to jog freely a few days later. I could ride a bike without pain. I could soon run. I could jump. I could kick a ball. It was a beautiful feeling.
I was still nervous. I had been out for six months and had lost confidence in my body. I wasn’t sure if my groin and pelvis would stand up to the rigours of training. But within a few days I felt like my old self again. I felt normal, at last.
I made my comeback on 21 September 2011.


Excerpt from Gerrard: My Story
 
Success breeds success. I think a rhythm of winning matches can be beneficial at this stage of the season.

If the popular diagnosis of Liverpool's problems is true - that they're knackered and their defence needs organising - then the extra time on the training ground will help not hinder.
 
As much as the resident scousers like to remind us that the aim for this season was top 4 and they're still in the fight for that, after 20 games of this campaign they were 5 points off top and 2nd in the league. Now, just 4 games later, they're 13 points off top and lying in 5th, with no wins in their last 5 league games and just 1 in their last 10 in all competitions, having been knocked out of both cups.

Rodgers was replaced by Klopp in October 2015 because the owners were worried CL qualification would get away from Liverpool for a second successive season by keeping him on. As it transpired, they failed to qualify for Europe at all by finishing 8th, two positions lower than Rodgers finished in 14/15, but this was glossed over because they reached two cup finals (and lost).

After beating City on New Years Eve, there was no looking over the shoulder at them, Spurs and Arsenal, never mind United in 6th, and the focus was on keeping pace with Chelsea. After Chelsea lost to Spurs, Liverpool actually gained ground despite drawing with Sunderland, yet now find themselves plummeting down the table, with only 6 teams performing worse than them over the last 6 games (Sunderland, Bournemouth, Leicester, Middlesbrough, Southampton and Palace).

When Liverpool underperformed in the league last season it was because Klopp needed a proper transfer window and because the players were focused on the Europa League, which they lost. When Liverpool got knocked out of the cups this season it was because they were concentrating on the league, which they've not won a game in since 2016. Now Liverpool are struggling in the league, it's because Klopp, despite having three transfer windows now, still hasn't yet been able to bring in who he needs to add appropriate depth to the squad and because like, two players were unavailable for a bit in January. Despite moaning about a lack of depth, the squad doesn't have depth because Klopp allowed 16 players to leave on a permanent basis, with a further 13 leaving on loan, with only 6 coming in, 2 of which were keepers that are being kept out of the team by the old keeper that one was brought in to replace. Furthermore, it's been apparent for a good 3 seasons that Liverpool's defence needs work, so obviously this was rectified by bringing in 2 defenders, one of which is a 31-year-old journeyman, and letting 7 senior defenders leave, forcing Klopp to play Milner as a left-back and Lucas as a centre-back.

But it's not Klopp that's the problem, it's injuries, or international tournaments, or not having a big squad because of a lack of games, or not having a big squad because of too many games, or the population of Plymouth, or United even when they aren't playing United, or the wind.

I think its stupid to have an aim set out for the season, then when it seems like we are exceeding this expectation raise the bar. Why? You're just setting yourself up for dissapointment.
We have said top four is the aim. Why? Because with the funds available and players we have we should be able to at least compete for a spot. So when things are going well why is it right to raise the bar and say "well now I think we can compete for the title" Only a few moments ago we were saying this squad is capable for challenging for top four maximum.

This is why we need to remind ourselves that top four was the aim, because in relation to that original aim we are still in with a shout. We need to remind ourselves what are squad is capable of, its a testement that a team with the abysmal defence of ours is anywhere near the top of the league. In fact it may even say more about the lack of quality in the league than our team being good.


Now in regards to Rodgers being sacked because of missing out on top four. Nobody expected Klopp to come in and take us to top four in his first (not even full) season. Which is why nobody was upset when he finished 8th, he had no transfer window and guided us to two cup finals. An excellent achievment, not even up for debate.

Now, who said the reason we got knocked out the cups this season was because we were concentrating on the league? Thats the first I've heard. By concentrating on the league do you mean we played the kids?

We've been struggling in the league for a number of reasons, lack of depth, Mané absence, Matip's absence, Coutinho injury, Henderson injury (+ fatigue if you believe that), Lallana has also come out and said we dont have a winning mentality. I completely agree with this, you could see it back when we finished second. The players cant cope with pressure... its all well and good having young, hungry, fast players but experience cant be undermined.

The players we let go are players we needed to get rid of, and probably allowed us a bigger budget to spend players on. Its important to understand the difference in depth in squad and quality in depth. Liverpool lack QUALITY in depth.
No point saying well Benteke is awful, but you know what? we dont have the depth so lets keep him, pay him his wages for another season (whatever astronomical amount that adds up to) and hope he gets us a goal or two. On top of that, Benteke wouldnt be happy sitting on the bench knowing theres a club that is after his signature who are willing to offer first team football. You cant just keep every player because you need depth.
 
Looks like Lallana is getting a new contract worth £150k a week. Isn't that more than what Sanchez is on at Arsenal?
 
I think its stupid to have an aim set out for the season, then when it seems like we are exceeding this expectation raise the bar. Why? You're just setting yourself up for dissapointment.
We have said top four is the aim. Why? Because with the funds available and players we have we should be able to at least compete for a spot. So when things are going well why is it right to raise the bar and say "well now I think we can compete for the title" Only a few moments ago we were saying this squad is capable for challenging for top four maximum.

This is why we need to remind ourselves that top four was the aim, because in relation to that original aim we are still in with a shout. We need to remind ourselves what are squad is capable of, its a testement that a team with the abysmal defence of ours is anywhere near the top of the league. In fact it may even say more about the lack of quality in the league than our team being good.


Now in regards to Rodgers being sacked because of missing out on top four. Nobody expected Klopp to come in and take us to top four in his first (not even full) season. Which is why nobody was upset when he finished 8th, he had no transfer window and guided us to two cup finals. An excellent achievment, not even up for debate.

Now, who said the reason we got knocked out the cups this season was because we were concentrating on the league? Thats the first I've heard. By concentrating on the league do you mean we played the kids?

We've been struggling in the league for a number of reasons, lack of depth, Mané absence, Matip's absence, Coutinho injury, Henderson injury (+ fatigue if you believe that), Lallana has also come out and said we dont have a winning mentality. I completely agree with this, you could see it back when we finished second. The players cant cope with pressure... its all well and good having young, hungry, fast players but experience cant be undermined.

The players we let go are players we needed to get rid of, and probably allowed us a bigger budget to spend players on. Its important to understand the difference in depth in squad and quality in depth. Liverpool lack QUALITY in depth.
No point saying well Benteke is awful, but you know what? we dont have the depth so lets keep him, pay him his wages for another season (whatever astronomical amount that adds up to) and hope he gets us a goal or two. On top of that, Benteke wouldnt be happy sitting on the bench knowing theres a club that is after his signature who are willing to offer first team football. You cant just keep every player because you need depth.

Is it? Leicester entered last season with the aim of surviving for another season. By around this stage, although there was talk of the title, expectations were firmly set on European, potentially Champions League qualification, and shortly afterwards raised again Champions League qualification and potentially winning the league. Had they seen a huge slump and ended up 7th or 8th, regardless of whether their fans would have been delighted with that if you'd offered them that before the season began, they'd have been disappointed come May. Hell, if they'd lost out in the final few games they'd have enjoyed the ride, but would still have been disappointed to fall short at the final hurdle.

Your target in 2013/14 wasn't a title challenge, but you were all still extremely disappointed to finish 2nd at the end of the season because your impressive form had raised your expectations from European qualification and potential CL spot to winning the league. Likewise, you aren't happy now because you're still on course for a challenge for top 4, you're disappointed because 4 games ago you were within touching distance of 1st.

United's target for every season for the last two decades has been to qualify for the CL, with that raising to winning the title as season's have developed. When we've missed out on the league, we've been disappointed, and when we've missed out on CL qualification, managers have been sacked.

The expectations set out at the beginning of the season will be the minimum, if it looks like you're going to exceed that but then suddenly collapse, people are rightfully going to be disappointed.

If you qualify for the CL this season you can be obviously be pleased with your season. However, you can still be disappointed that the very brief title challenge ended in such catastrophic fashion.

That was precisely the expectation for Klopp, or to challenge for it at least. Rodgers was sacked very early on in the season and Klopp brought in for the sole reason that it was already beginning to look like CL qualification was getting away from you. As it happened, Klopp got nowhere near challenging for top 4, even when the cup competitions were in their relative infancy. The excuse that the league was abandoned in favour for the cups is a ridiculous one, and is made more ridiculous by the fact that you won neither competition. People make out like Klopp came in halfway through the season, when in reality, he had 30 of the 38 games as Liverpool manager, and there was no noticeable improvement or drop off in league form at any point during that season.

You read this forum, right? A couple of your scouse brethren have suggested as much, and Klopp himself came out and commented on the importance of league matches vs cup matches with his "rather lose 3 in 3 competitions than 3 in 1" soundbite.

So basically, you've struggled because of a lack of strength in depth? Which is precisely the point I made. Klopp got rid of a number of players because he didn't think they suited the one style of play he likes to use, and funnily enough, Klopp using just one style of play and having no players suitable for a different system is another reason that you've struggled of late. Looking at your outgoing transfers, just a few of Skrtel, Sakho, Benteke, Allen, Ibe, Flanagan or Balotelli could have helped you out a great deal this season because they'd have provided you with other options and better cover for positions than you currently have. It's not like you've had a crisis of absent players in one position, you've had 4 players gone from 4 different positions.
 
Bullshit.

If you only finish 4th chances are you won't win the CL next season anyway. It's only money that's the difference.
Whichever place you finish, the chances are you are not gonna win the Champions League next season. That doesn't mean finishing 5th is the same as finishing third. That doesn't even constitute an argument.

To say nothing of how stupid 'only money' sounds.
 
Whichever place you finish, the chances are you are not gonna win the Champions League next season. That doesn't mean finishing 5th is the same as finishing third. That doesn't even constitute an argument.

To say nothing of how stupid 'only money' sounds.

The argument wasn't just about finishing 5th v 3rd, it was finishing 5th plus winning the FA Cup.
 
Bullshit.

If you only finish 4th chances are you won't win the CL next season anyway. It's only money that's the difference.
A Chelsea side that finished 5th won the CL only days later. Same for Liverpool in 05 iirc.

It's more about pedigree and having what it takes for a cup competition than whether you got 2nd or 4th in a league format.
 
I'd consider myself a mature, professional guy - so I don't want this to sound bizarrely sweeping.

But there is something inearth in anybody associated with Liverpool, there's a really bizarre delusion that because they were hip in the 80s, their time will come again soon. All LFC fans seem to have this strange chip on their shoulder and they get carried away by a little uplift in form. You can see it in ex-players too when they are acting as pundits, the likes of Houghton, Aldridge is a very odd one, Phil Thompson etc, they get too giddy when the team has a short run of wins. So their fans, their ex-players and now their board members all seem to have the same rush of blood to the head which is the reason boom boost cycles appear. It must be absolutely soul-destroying to be a fan or member of Liverpool - the amount of false dawns they set themselves up for is so crazy. And the strangest thing is; they NEVER learn.

They must be brain drained from all the disappointments they go through on an annual basis.

The facts remain that Liverpool have won 1 trophy (a League Cup) in the past 11 seasons and in the past 8 seasons they have finished 7th, 6th, 8th, 7th, 2nd, 6th, 8th and look most likely to finish 6th again this year.

Where do they get their positivity from? It's so strange.


Its the human condition. We live and die by the need for hope regardless of how realistic it is. Usually the more desperate you are, the bigger the most minute of glimmer (of hope) appears to the beholder..
 
If out of top 4 and he can't unearth unknown gem like Suarez

He wasn't so unknown. He was a very talented bad boy. Much the same as when they signed Ballotelli. They simply can't attract the star players anymore so took gambles on rogues. I thought they may have tried to sign Ravel Morrison.
 
Liverpool have won 2 of their last 5 against Everton. The last match was a final minute jammy goal from sturridge too, with Everton looking a better proposition now and Liverpool looking far worse.
Form doesn't really come into the equation when it comes to derby. Personally, I write it off as 3 points gained for Liverpool every time they face Everton, anything more will be a bonus. It's extremely annoying considering how Everton always raise its game against us but always bend over for Liverpool. :lol:

For anyone who seriously think that Liverpool will not make top 4, they are now priced at 5/4 not to make top 4 and I thought that's pretty good value. Not sure why the bookmakers would price Arsenal higher than Liverpool, when Arsenal is still above Liverpool and always make top 4.
 
The only difference between Rogers and Klopp, and we all know results-wise there is NO difference so far (and I only see Klopp's deteriaorating) is that I could envisage Rogers there for many, many years - whereas I see Klopp gone in 18-months' time.
The same as a Rogers team that included Suarez, Gerrard, Sterling and a shit-hot Sturridge not the invalid we have now. Yeah, no comparison. Rogers had an exciting team but was very lucky with his personnel.
 
How can you consider 2 lost finals in a season progress when your cup performances this season have seen you eliminated from the two you were in whilst your league form took you from 2nd and 5 points off top, to 5th and 13 points off top in the space of 4 games?

FA Cup last season you were taken to a replay by Exeter in the third round, won the replay, then got taken to a replay by West Ham in the fourth and beaten in that. This season you got taken to a replay by Plymouth in the third round of the FA Cup, beat them in the replay, only to lose to Wolves at home in the fourth round. You got beaten in a cup final in February, then threw all of your eggs in the basket of another cup and lost that after leading at half time. As for the claims about throwing in the league, following your progress to the semi-finals of the EL you were 8th, 2 points off 7th, and finished 8th, 2 points off 7th.

Everyone and his dog said you'd look better than you were because you had no European football, then you started this season looking better than you were, only to collapse as soon as there was a small build up of games.

I get you being optimistic about the guy, but you just pick and choose stuff to suit whatever agenda you're patronisingly pushing on others.
Well done for being incredibly selective without giving much thought behind the reasons behind those examples. In fact I'd go as far as to say you've looked at pure black & white wihout ANY thought as to why any of those circumstances occured. I simply can't be arsed going through it again but to condense a response to your points in order a) playing weakended teams in the PL b) playing weakended teams in the FAC c) playing weakended teams in the FAC d) playing weakended teams in the PL e) 9 games in 30 days with injuries to, absentees, just returning from injury ... vuirtually all of our top players and, unlike most of the other top teams, we have a very small squad.

As I said you gave it no thought, it looks good to you and that's enough to launch into LFC, which, let's face it, is all that many on here require (which I get I'd be gleeful too if I was a Manc). Let me pose you another question instead, consider it arse about tit, when we were playing well what were the key factors influencing our form and style ?
 
Liverpool will comfortably make into top 4, despite the fact that klopps one dimensional tactics being found out more consistantly nowadays. The liverpool fans who keep insisting the gegenpressing is the next best thing since sliced bread, will find out all about its flaws next season with thick and fast european games. Thats when they will drop down and probably out of top 4, as usual. sorry but had to be said.
 
Thought he'd been found out big time in his last season at Dortmund and not seen anything to convince me otherwise since. Also thought he was a bellend in the summer of 2014 when we got linked to a couple of his players.



Touched a nerve?

Not sure what tactical analysis has to do with tangible results. End of the day, you remained shite last season despite a managerial change, and are currently in a horrendous run of form with that same manager.

What point are you trying to make here exactly? That article claims that Liverpool made progress last season when actual results say otherwise, and the improvement seen in the first half of this season has already been effectively made irrelevant by the shocking performances since the turn of the year.
I t doesn't take a genius to work out the point I'm making. Progress is slow and doesn't appear overnight. There will be periods when it comes together and times when it doesn't. Stability and consistency live in the realm of experience.
 
Fatigue isn't quite the right terminology for me. I think you have to look at the overall health & well-being of the team (squad) as a whole.

So you'd expect MOST teams to be at their strongest between say games 5 - 12 of the season, fresh but have played themselves into form, no key injuries. There will be some variation around this depending on preparation / circumstances - as there will at every stage.

With LFC in Jan, they have just not been in good shape as an XI going out to play - too many changes, key men not there, couple do need a rest but he doesn't want to play Moreno for Milner (he has looked knackered a couple of times). But it all ebbs & flows too, they could get a surge now from Coutinho finding some form, Mane is back...

I think making huge generalizations that they are gone for the season is a bit lazy - although you might be right too.

And what happens when things are going less well is that your other weaknesses become more exposed.

Tactics are not rocket science or miracles - there's only 2 variables of whether you have the ball or you don't & what you do in each circumstance,but I'm still not believing that teams give up possession deliberately as a preferred method of play like some posts read all over this forum. More likely it is a natural consequence of a team saying our outfield committment to attacking is 3 or 4 players maximum at any one time, the rest keep the shape 24/7 kind of thing. And you won't draw them out if they do it in a very disciplined way. LFC keep giving them goals though, that isn't down to devious tactics from the opposition is it? Better teams give you more space to play because they normally commit more players to attack & creates a shape of game that has suited LFC better it would seem. You could also say they have different types of attacking players that maybe the LFC defenders are more comfortable playing against - which is a little bit strange, maybe.

/Ramble ends.
The voice of reason and intelligent debate yet again.
 
Form doesn't really come into the equation when it comes to derby. Personally, I write it off as 3 points gained for Liverpool every time they face Everton, anything more will be a bonus. It's extremely annoying considering how Everton always raise its game against us but always bend over for Liverpool. :lol:

But as I said, Liverpool have won 2 out of the last 5 against Everton?
 
But as I said, Liverpool have won 2 out of the last 5 against Everton?

It's one of those weird quirks of football that despite this, Everton have still got 0 points from these fixtures and Liverpool have gained 15.
 
Well done for being incredibly selective without giving much thought behind the reasons behind those examples. In fact I'd go as far as to say you've looked at pure black & white wihout ANY thought as to why any of those circumstances occured. I simply can't be arsed going through it again but to condense a response to your points in order a) playing weakended teams in the PL b) playing weakended teams in the FAC c) playing weakended teams in the FAC d) playing weakended teams in the PL e) 9 games in 30 days with injuries to, absentees, just returning from injury ... vuirtually all of our top players and, unlike most of the other top teams, we have a very small squad.

As I said you gave it no thought, it looks good to you and that's enough to launch into LFC, which, let's face it, is all that many on here require (which I get I'd be gleeful too if I was a Manc). Let me pose you another question instead, consider it arse about tit, when we were playing well what were the key factors influencing our form and style ?

I've said multiple times what I think the problems have been. You've got no strength in depth because Klopp trimmed the squad to the extreme, leaving little to no cover for a number of positions, and leaving no room for him to adapt his tactics. It's Klopp's fault and Klopp's alone that you had no one even remotely good enough to step in and cover your first XI, and Klopp's fault and Klopp's alone that you've tried to play the same way regardless of how the opposition have countered the tactic.

I said this earlier, but you've not had a crisis where a number of players who play in one position were unavailable at the same time forcing you to have an obvious weakness, you had a few players from different positions unavailable. It's not ideal, but it shouldn't decimate a team the way it has with you. You knew Mane and potentially Matip would be gone for the ACoN, and you knew injuries are more likely to occur during fixture congestion. You also knew that the busiest period of the season would coincide with the ACoN starting, so it shouldn't take a genius to work out that you'd need a bit of decent cover to help carry you through, and any manager worth his salt should at least have a Plan B.

But yeah, no thought at all.
 
This thread is interesting and I am enjoying it. However, for the United fans criticizing Klopp for trimming the squad, buying average players, his tactics that are not sustainable etc, it would really not speak very well of United and the manager if he still finishes above your team this season.
Sure, they are seemingly in free fall but they are still ahead of you. Perhaps hold off a bit just in case Liverpool finish above United
 
This thread is interesting and I am enjoying it. However, for the United fans criticizing Klopp for trimming the squad, buying average players, his tactics that are not sustainable etc, it would really not speak very well of United and the manager if he still finishes above your team this season.
Sure, they are seemingly in free fall but they are still ahead of you. Perhaps hold off a bit just in case Liverpool finish above United

But we're not claiming to be much better. However, our current manager has had 30 fewer league games than theirs.

We're paying the price for a poor run early in the season and being inconsistent in front of goal.

If we miss out on top 4, Mourinho will get one more season where the expectation will be to mount a title challenge. If he doesn't do that, he'll get sacked. We won't be sat here going "but injuries", "but fixtures".
 
@Rafateria admittedly I haven't read too deep into the discussion, but you can't be lamenting the size of your squad when you lose 2-0 to Hull.
 




So what is his plan until the end of the season? Keep axing the one that makes the latest mistakes?