peterstorey
Still not banned
- Joined
- Nov 16, 2002
- Messages
- 37,291
Chelsea's front 4 are great on the ball - it's what happens behind that's the problem. Norwich made a number of chances and blew them.
A lot of people were too think to underrate last season when in the second half he found it naturally tougher.He's a quality player and now surrounded by players on the same wavelength (Hazard and Oscar), he shines even more.
The emergence of ramires as a top midfielder who does all the dirty work has added to their resurgence as well. Exactly the type of midfielder we lack.
I do think Kagawa will turn out just as good given time though. But we definately need to change our style of play to accomodate that just like chelski have done.
The emergence of ramires as a top midfielder who does all the dirty work has added to their resurgence as well. Exactly the type of midfielder we lack.
I do think Kagawa will turn out just as good given time though. But we definately need to change our style of play to accomodate that just like chelski have done.
I think he meant Kagawa and MataRamires and Kagawa... Yeah nothing alike whatsoever.
Cracking player. Impossible to dislike him as well, seems like a nice bloke. That he doesn't get a look in with the Spanish NT just shows the bags of quality they have, he'd be starting in almost any (if not all) other team.
Silva is technically better and more elegant imo but in terms of overall effectiveness and end product they are at about the same level.
Mata is more effective when it comes to scoring goals and providing assists. He is a workman like player though. Silva has more flair in his game.
He isn't workman like, he technique is exemplary.