Cassidy
No longer at risk of being mistaken for a Scouser
- Joined
- Oct 2, 2013
- Messages
- 32,941
Nicereleasing it today
Nicereleasing it today
Boy does it feel good to have serious people back in charge of our football affairs
Not to mention preparing a bid.woodward will be sat at home, smirking to
himself that the amateurs in charge don’t even know about the “monitoring the situation” phase of any successful transfer.
That's my lunch time viewing sorted if it's out by then!releasing it today
Absolutely. Not relevant for FFP purposes but very much so for your cash flow.Its nothing to do with FFP, it doesn’t affect it because all transfers on the accounts are amortised regardless of it you pay the full fee upfront or not.
It is however beneficial to structure payments so you have more cashflow for more transfers in the window. However it does not help you get around FFP as on the books the transfers are treated the same.
On the selling side however this is where it makes a difference because you want the full sale or as much of it to reflect on the accounts right away
Boy does it feel good to have serious people back in charge of our football affairs
I'm thinking United may have decided to monitor the player while he's already at the club. Which seems fair enough to me.Why are we getting business done so swiftly? This isn't how we do things.
Did we even prepare a bid?
I was preparing the flight tracker but things have moved too quick. Don't know what is happening to this club.Nobody tracking flights yet? This place has gone downhill
Are people secretly getting paid money for making this post over and over? And if so, how do I get involved?
Yep, whether you pay upfront or in instalments - that's a cashflow argument. FFP amortizes the cost over the length of the contract - is it up to a max of 5 years (iirc, they changed it after Boehly started handing out 6 year contracts?).Its nothing to do with FFP, it doesn’t affect it because all transfers on the accounts are amortised regardless of it you pay the full fee upfront or not.
It is however beneficial to structure payments so you have more cashflow for more transfers in the window. However it does not help you get around FFP as on the books the transfers are treated the same.
On the selling side however this is where it makes a difference because you want the full sale or as much of it to reflect on the accounts right away
Really? I think his shooting is very good. He places shots and with both feet. He is not "close eyes and shoot with power" type.His all round game looks really good and I think he will make us play better but his shooting looks average at best. If we can get a goal scoring right winger, our attack will be sorted for years to come
Tbf I’m basing my opinion on YouTube compilations but from what I’ve seen, it lacks a bit of “bite” that a striker should haveReally? I think his shooting is very good. He places shots and with both feet. He is not "close eyes and shoot with power" type.
Yeah but PSR is a slightly different beast, and the one we have more issues with, PSR deals with actual annual accounts, so whilst the structure of the deal does not matter with FFP it definitely does with PSRYep, whether you pay upfront or in instalments - that's a cashflow argument. FFP amortizes the cost over the length of the contract - is it up to a max of 5 years (iirc, they changed it after Boehly started handing out 6 year contracts?).
Nobody tracking flights yet? This place has gone downhill
I was making the same point that this means we are relying on a Rashford resurgence unless we sign another attacker so I think we are in agreement
Rashford resurgence, Garnacho to improve his numbers, Amad to make the step up and Antony to sort himself out. A lot to ask really.
It's only a bargain if he's any good.30 odd million is a bargain these days...it will help the lad as well to not have a huge transfer fee on his shoulders.
You also moaned a lot in the De Ligt thread. Are you a negative person in your life as well or just in the forum?It's only a bargain if he's any good.
Why is all this taking so long!?
Yeah but PSR is a slightly different beast, and the one we have more issues with, PSR deals with actual annual accounts, so whilst the structure of the deal does not matter with FFP it definitely does with PSR
Aargh, thanks for the info. Admittedly I’m not too clued up about the differences between the twoYeah but PSR is a slightly different beast, and the one we have more issues with, PSR deals with actual annual accounts, so whilst the structure of the deal does not matter with FFP it definitely does with PSR
He's basically Ibrahimovich with the pace of R9 and tenacity of young Rooney.Hopefully he's quality, don't know anything about him really.
Hopefully they realise he doesn't need to be as bulked up as he is now. Rather he added that bit of acceleration or top speed by being a bit lighter.
The Lukaku failed bulk experiment showed how unnecessary it was. Lukaku at West Brom was 10 X the player that played at United or Inter.
Is that statement wrong?You also moaned a lot in the De Ligt thread. Are you a negative person in your life as well or just in the forum?
Serious?Why is all this taking so long!?
You also moaned a lot in the De Ligt thread. Are you a negative person in your life as well or just in the forum?