He mentions him in probably 75% of his postsIt's weird still being in denial over it, isn't it? He basically doesn't exist as a player for us now, people just don't want to accept the reality.
He mentions him in probably 75% of his postsIt's weird still being in denial over it, isn't it? He basically doesn't exist as a player for us now, people just don't want to accept the reality.
Ten Hag Ball was especially enjoyable whenever Martial was fit.He played very similar to Martial
Interesting, thanks! I guess a very different profile to Hojlund then which makes sense.
Most enjoyable this year we were without striker at all.Ten Hag Ball was especially enjoyable whenever Martial was fit.
Ten Hag Ball was especially enjoyable whenever Martial was fit.
But Ornstein is one of the most reliable journalists out there in the country. He’s not the kind of journalist who will just do such a report. And also Ornstein is normally get his source from UK not from an oversea agent in serie A.I think his deal with AC Milan was stopped due to his agent demanding €15m, this could be him trying to put pressure on AC Milan.
For us it was. But I’ve always remembered ETH having like a target man upfront. Haller for Ajax being one.Ten Hag Ball was especially enjoyable whenever Martial was fit.
Or Tadic as a false nine?For us it was. But I’ve always remembered ETH having like a target man upfront. Haller for Ajax being one.
Martial is such a wasted talent. IMHO we shouldn't just look for a "facilitator" playing in the CF position. He also needs to score ~20 goals. It's not like we have prime Bale, Ronaldo, or Rooney playing on the wings. As a manager I wouldn't put my trust in Rashford and Garnacho to get me the numbers.Martial has a much better hold up play and is a superior finisher. Martial could also score a variety of goals and was a much better dribbler. This guy is more of a facilitator. A Martial on form would thrive as a left wide forward if this guy was playing as a false 9.
For us it was. But I’ve always remembered ETH having like a target man upfront. Haller for Ajax being one.
Surely if United say we’re not giving you 15m you greedy bastard, then it’ll force the player to ask him to drop his demands and stop pricing him out of moves.I think his deal with AC Milan was stopped due to his agent demanding €15m, this could be him trying to put pressure on AC Milan.
He wasn’t played upfront all the time though. He likes his big men aswell. Hence the reason he signed Weghorst for us. Hojlund. If he wanted a false 9 type then he wouldn’t have gone for Hojlund. I also don’t think Zirkzee will help with our goalscoring problems. If we sign him then we need a goalscoring winger to help with goals.Not sure Tadic counts as a target man. If anything his body of work at Ajax showed how adaptable he could be. It's why his decisions to persist with certain things last season was so surprising.
Surely if United say we’re not giving you 15m you greedy bastard, then it’ll force the player to ask him to drop his demands and stop pricing him out of moves.
Surely if United say we’re not giving you 15m you greedy bastard, then it’ll force the player to ask him to drop his demands and stop pricing him out of moves.
you would think the player would tell their own agent to feck off. United would probably treble his current wages and you then have the agent risking that as he wants a payday.
He'd be a squad player attacker who probably helps in terms of giving us something different in attack but doesn't score many goals himself. Gives us something different when Hojlund is having an off day, but doesn't bench Hojlund (which is fine). Probably suits Rashford more than Hojlund does.Is he any good?
As I said earlier in the thread, there was a lot of disappointment in the Netherlands over the inclusion of Brobbey over Zirkzee, but Koeman is just very conservative in his squad picks. It also took him ages to finally include Frimpong and no-one understood why. Weghorst is a special case, as somehow he's great for the Dutch team at the supersub goalscorer role, which obviously isn't Zirkzee's profile.As for why he wasn't in the squad originally? No idea, maybe like in the case of Grealish. The manager thought he had similar players or his own preferences. Who knows.
Yeah ok, that's also true. @roonster09 also said something similar above.If a pure 9 like Hojlund isn't working you might want to introduce a different striker to give the opposition defenders something different to deal with.
You keep evaluating Zirkzee within a goalscoring striker context, but he just isn't that. It's unfair to the player to use those criteria and if that's what United want, they definitely shouldn't sign him.Gakpo, fair, but that was also during their period where Edwards left and their transfer strategy went down hill a bit. Zirkzee I'd compare more to a Gakpo where he had some good bits on video and you sign him in the hope his analytical profile isn't representative of what he will become. Though Klopp also used Gakpo as a midfielder or wide player, not a CF. It's a different thing to be a 1 in 4 wide player than a 1 in 4 center forward (which is shit).
He is a false 9 but in the games I have watched, he has similar movement to an attacking mid. Firmino in his last two Liverpool seasons comes to mind.Are you suggesting he’s an AM? Or can play there? I thought he was like a false 9. Not sure he has the creativeness to play as our main creator in the number 10 role. Also not sure if he’s work with Hojlund. It’s probably him or Hojlund that would start. We need a creative winger who can assist the ST in the box.
It's weird still being in denial over it, isn't it? He basically doesn't exist as a player for us now, people just don't want to accept the reality.
You might as well stick with your belief of Santa Claus too.i will stick to my hope of seeing Greenwood return.
We are buying him to be a squad center forward, of course he should be scoring goals now and then. He hasn't been much of a creator or much of a scorer. Just bring Wout Weghorst back if you want a big lump who works hard defensively.As I said earlier in the thread, there was a lot of disappointment in the Netherlands over the inclusion of Brobbey over Zirkzee, but Koeman is just very conservative in his squad picks. It also took him ages to finally include Frimpong and no-one understood why. Weghorst is a special case, as somehow he's great for the Dutch team at the supersub goalscorer role, which obviously isn't Zirkzee's profile.
Yeah ok, that's also true. @roonster09 also said something similar above.
You keep evaluating Zirkzee within a goalscoring striker context, but he just isn't that. It's unfair to the player to use those criteria and if that's what United want, they definitely shouldn't sign him.
The actual reality is that he is still under contract with us. Bit weird to talk about accepting reality whilst he is yet to be sold.
What if nobody wants him?
The reality is that he is still with us unfortunately for a lot of people.
When it changes i will then accept reality.
The reality is also that Ten Hag wanted him last year..
Nothing publicly has come out yet and i will stick to my hope of seeing Greenwood return.
Which i hope doesn't make people think of me as a bad person, because I've not done anything wrong.
Maradona’s 2x cases time probably didn’t have mobile phones invented to record audio - doesn’t make him free of charges by the public does it?
If the public is using evidence to make their decision then I do think the law has done that as well.
Not sure why the public is supposed to be better educated in law than judges and lawyers.
Anyway, I’ve seen Dani Alves, Ronaldo, Rooney, Maradona, Ribery, Benzema, De Gea, Neymar, Yaya Toure and so many many more have accusations. These are some of the best players of football of all time.
No one was stopping or angry about Benzema from winning the Balon dor and he has a year suspended jail sentence apparently.
I’m not against Greenwood being put down - but then so should have so many more players in the past and even present.
If others have gotten chances then so can Greenwood.
We are buying him to be a squad center forward, of course he should be scoring goals now and then. He hasn't been much of a creator or much of a scorer. Just bring Wout Weghorst back if you want a big lump who works hard defensively.
I just don't want us to sign the Van de Beek of CF's for 45m and it be a another big waste of money
Zee Zee!!He's got a cool name and on that basis I approve this transfer.
12 goals and 7 assits in 37 games for bologna this season. They had a very good season, made CL qualification and Zirkzee was a key part of that team.We are buying him to be a squad center forward, of course he should be scoring goals now and then. He hasn't been much of a creator or much of a scorer. Just bring Wout Weghorst back if you want a big lump who works hard defensively.
I just don't want us to sign the Van de Beek of CF's for 45m and it be a another big waste of money
Most enjoyable this year we were without striker at all.
Martial is such a wasted talent. IMHO we shouldn't just look for a "facilitator" playing in the CF position. He also needs to score ~20 goals. It's not like we have prime Bale, Ronaldo, or Rooney playing on the wings. As a manager I wouldn't put my trust in Rashford and Garnacho to get me the numbers.
0.41 combined xG and xAssists per 90 minutes puts him at the 26th percentile of forwards. That's extremely bad for his age and serie A when trying to relate it to the Prem. 54th percentile if you just look at Serie A forwards. To compare, Hojlund was at the 85th percentile with Atalanta.12 goals and 7 assits in 37 games for bologna this season. They had a very good season, made CL qualification and Zirkzee was a key part of that team.
Those numbers would be higher most likely at a club of higher stature.
Not sure what this is based on, as it can't be based on how many of them he scores.
I think it is a yes brainer
The 'low minimum fee clause' is still going to be a significant percentage of our transfer fund. And others would argue that Hojlund could do with an experienced striker to learn from rather than competing with a player of a similar age, who is also lacking top level experience. It's also very clear that United need goals in this team. Zirkzee is absolutely not someone who has evidenced that he can reach 20+ goals in this league.
But for the same agent who fooked us over with Tevez,, I’d agree tell the player change your agent we’ll sign you?
This is a really interesting and helpful summary of his career to date. Thank you!Zirkzee's youth record is impeccable. During the 17/18 season he scored 16 goals in 21 games at U17 Bundesliga youth level. The year after he scored 22 goals in 39 matches again at youth level. The year after he was slowly introduced to first team. His opportunities were very limited. In the Bundesliga he featured just 3 times in the starting 11 and played a total of 9 times. Yet he was still able to score 4 goals and create an assist. Season 20/21 was quite horrible in terms of goals and opportunities. He played a total of 4 games between league and CL, starting just 1 game and scoring nothing. He was then loaned to Parma and in an injury stricken season there he played 4 games coming off the bench in all of them and scoring in none of them.
The season after he moved to Anderlecht and the goals kept piling in. He scored 18 goals and created 13 assists in 48 games in his first season. Bologna signed him on a permanent transfer and they barely used him. In the Serie A played 19 games in which he started just 5 of them and he scored 2 goals. The Italians have a different line of thought to the British. Unless we're talking of crystalline talent such as Maldini then they love to give kids a year or two on the bench/on loan to keep the hype in check. Anyway this season was his breakthrough, 12 goals and 7 assists in 37 matches
Some will point out that he only had one great season at top level. However this is the first season were he played regularly at top level as well. Is he a world class finisher like Haaland is? I doubt it. However when one analyze his stats you notice that his goals and assists ratio is very close to one another. That suggest a striker that is hardworking, will drop deep and will create chances for others. We're not talking of a goal poacher here.
33m is peanuts for today's standards. The gambler would probably cost us 50m if not more. Regarding the rest I suggest you read the remainder of the post. This guy can score goals and he can create assists. I won't exclude a scenario were both Hojlund and Zirkzee can play together
For the price being quoted he's worth a punt but I would rather we went for Guirassy instead. Better player and a similar fee.
For the price being quoted he's worth a punt but I would rather we went for Guirassy instead. Better player and a similar fee.
Is 35 million silly money to you?Can we please not spend silly money on a striker who scored 12 goals last season? Once in 2 years is bad enough.
That's roughly what Mane got at his last season at Southampton before moving to Liverpool. 11 goals and 6 assists.Can we please not spend silly money on a striker who scored 12 goals last season? Once in 2 years is bad enough.
Shouldn't be overlooked. Also, people saying that we should have two proven strikers ready to go at any moment...you have to be a team that guarantees trophies every year to keep players happy with that scenario.
City and Madrid can do that right now, but considering United haven't won the league since 2013, we don't really have that appeal.
Signing players who might be on the cusp of hitting their stride is what we have to aim for right now.