I was going to start a new José thread, and then I realised that we have more Mourinho threads than the man himself has league points. So, instead, here's a discussion we've had before but I'd like to read some fresh opinions in light of recent events:
Pseuds Corner presents: Why do so many people insist that Mourinho is entertaining?
I could go on and on as to why I don't believe this is so, but here's my bottom line (ooer): football is no longer so engrossing that mere matches are enough; the drama has to be found elsewhere, and there are few personalities as wilfully dramatic as Box Office José's. But, surely, this endless cycle of manmade meltdowns and mayhem is a poor substitute for the thrills and spills of the game itself? It's similar to the state of 'celebrity' shows, in which the alleged stars are often people who once slept with someone truly famous; it's fame-by-association, and no substitute for the real stars. Ironically, Mourinho himself has played a major part in football becoming less interesting, what with his 'safety-first' philosophy* (an approach copied by other managers who are insecure about keeping their jobs) and his shabby, blatant gamesmanship.
Sure, we all need things to discuss on...erm...discussion boards, and José provides us with talking points, in the form of a regular diet of bullshit and outrage; but is it really entertainment? Or is it, as I suspect, a stand-in for the real stuff of football, at a time when players are so 'corporatised' and faceless, and playing philosophies are so drab and defensive that practically any distraction is welcomed?
*Yes, I know that his Real Madrid team scored a billion goals in his time there. Big whoop.