GlastonSpur
Also disliked on an Aston Villa forum
- Joined
- Feb 4, 2007
- Messages
- 17,716
- Supports
- Spurs
If that was your definition of controlling the game then you're right, there's no discussion to be had, if Arsenal weren't full of a mix of lazy cnuts and average players you'd have gotten slapped up the way they dominated the ball, and if you thought that was entertaining from your team, which was the serving up shite i was referring to btw, then I feel bad for you, as obnoxious as you are personally we all had to admit Spurs were a good watch under Pochettino. Like I say though, lets see if you disappear again when it goes to shit as you know as well as I do that it will under Mourinho.
Ignoring your personal abuse ...
Spurs were 2 - 0 up at half-time. After which there was no need for Spurs to do anything but defend (and by the way, good defending can also be entertaining). Arsenal were left to simply play around in front of us to no good effect.
But if we'd needed to go up a gear or two, which we didn't, then the team was/is more than capable of doing so.
So yes, Spurs controlled the game. But you confuse possession with control. And when a team is 2 - 0 down and toothless in attack, they are even less in control.