Ban
New Member
They really hate him.
It is strange. I remember Fergie playing 4 defenders in midfield vs Arsenal and shitReally confusing to see United play like that and were sitting ducks against Bournemouth. Are we really that toothless without Pogba? If yes, then should Jose not take the blame for that? You cannot put so much emphasis on one player at a club. Jose's pre match conference was all about how the team will be determined to do well post the City loss, but we were only determined in defending well.
Maybe Lukaku needs a rest and Martial and Rashford need to start upfront together but the football United play is really bad after a decent start where the goals were fun to watch.
Other than the results we are not going ahead in terms of the quality of football.
Same points as the 4th placed team and more points than Liverpool. What does worst EPL season mean and why is it a factor? we finished 4th the season before so it was clear we were then a top 4 team. People keep hardping on about 7th but we had massive investment since that season"Joint 4th" we were 5th in one of the worst EPL seasons ever.
When Jose took over we were joint 4th though. It was he who took us down to 6th, below the likes of Liverpool who came from behind to overtake us.
People keep hardping on about 7th but we had massive investment since that season
Same points as the 4th placed team and more points than Liverpool. What does worst EPL season mean and why is it a factor? we finished 4th the season before so it was clear we were then a top 4 team. People keep hardping on about 7th but we had massive investment since that season
That's why I said it's not as serious but it's annoying to see such an arrogant behaviour. Wenger and Klopp have constantly questioned referees decisions and nothing. Maybe it's not worth the hassle but somewhere we should draw the line and fight back.
Liverpool came 7th the season before so nothing to see here. When the teams were supposedly good we came 4th. So it seemed we were about right. 4th/5th, in a CL race every season. doesn't seem like some mid table performing team but hey. getting 5th was a crime? why? City only went up one place when Guardiola took over. We were one of the only sides that didn't improve.In a season when Chelsea finished 10th, Liverpool finished 8th while City players threw the towel once Pep was announced as the next manager, getting 5th was a crime. You're just taking the results or standing as they were without looking farther into it, which is plain wrong. That was one of the worst EPL seasons ever. All big teams had a shocking form and the best we can got was 5th ?
You seem to forget the run of 8 successive games without a win in December.
Liverpool came 7th the season before so nothing to see here. When the teams were supposedly good we came 4th. So it seemed we were about right. 4th/5th, in a CL race every season. doesn't seem like some mid table performing team but hey. getting 5th was a crime? why? City only went up one place when Guardiola took over. We were one of the only sides that didn't improve.
Sorry but as Torres said when Chelsea won the CL, "the league position is your true level." everyone knows it. We flopped in the EPL last season and had to throw it which is a shame as its far more of a draw for me than Thursday night Europa (which I am currently avoiding like the plague now).Conveniently forgetting the winning of a double and entering (as opposed to exiting) the Champions league at the group stage.
Liverpool came 7th the season before so nothing to see here. When the teams were supposedly good we came 4th. So it seemed we were about right. 4th/5th, in a CL race every season. doesn't seem like some mid table performing team but hey. getting 5th was a crime? why? City only went up one place when Guardiola took over. We were one of the only sides that didn't improve.
Sorry but as Torres said when Chelsea won the CL, "the league position is your true level." everyone knows it. We flopped in the EPL last season and had to throw it which is a shame as its far more of a draw for me than Thursday night Europa (which I am currently avoiding like the plague now).
We did the double indeed.
It's about "the tactical fouling" comments according to Ducker. Ducker also says it's unlikely Jose will be charged by the FA.
It's a borderline irrelevant stat. The game and the money spent has moved on. What was a winning point tally seven years ago probably won't cut it anymore.
United and City have spent huge amounts over the last four years. Both clubs should be setting record totals come May.
It's a borderline irrelevant stat. The game and the money spent has moved on. What was a winning point tally seven years ago probably won't cut it anymore.
United and City have spent huge amounts over the last four years. Both clubs should be setting record totals come May.
People do not want to accept that things are not actually bad, it's just that City are on another level and Pogba has been injured.
It's a borderline irrelevant stat. The game and the money spent has moved on. What was a winning point tally seven years ago probably won't cut it anymore.
United and City have spent huge amounts over the last four years. Both clubs should be setting record totals come May.
If you're industrious enough, you'll find stats that makes José look better than Fergie and stats that make him look worse than Moyes. But that's what stats are for, aren't they? To buttress certain narrative.
It's like a team getting relegated with 41 points and giving the excuse that for many years, 40 points definitely guaranteed safety.
The fact is, we are in 2017 and in 2017, we are potentially 12 points behind a team after 16 games.
If you're industrious enough, you'll find stats that makes José look better than Fergie and stats that make him look worse than Moyes. But that's what stats are for, aren't they? To buttress certain narrative.
It's like a team getting relegated with 41 points and giving the excuse that for many years, 40 points definitely guaranteed safety.
The fact is, we are in 2017 and in 2017, we are potentially 12 points behind a team after 16 games.
If you're industrious enough, you'll find stats that makes José look better than Fergie and stats that make him look worse than Moyes. But that's what stats are for, aren't they? To buttress certain narrative.
It's like a team getting relegated with 41 points and giving the excuse that for many years, 40 points definitely guaranteed safety.
The fact is, we are in 2017 and in 2017, we are potentially 12 points behind a team after 16 games.
Exactly. You could basically call City’s start an anomaly, it’s really been insane.
On a second note, @haram, guess who is not gracing us with his presence considering United won their last match
Every season is different, look at the Leicester season.
It’s not as simple as «more money spent should equal in a new record point tally each year».
The thing is, there is hardly anyone with the same sentiment calling for us to amount x number of points. League positions and titles are decided on point difference not points amassed. The fact still remain that regardless of whatever points that City have acquired, we are 12 points worse off, and that is what really matters. They could only have 30 points so far and if we ran them closer with 25 points at this stage, the situation would not be this bad. History is not going to wipe off 12 points. Let's just face the facts.Its not as if, just 7 months ago, 35 points would have been enough to survive relegation.
The thing is, there is hardly anyone with the same sentiment calling for us to amount x number of points. League positions and titles are decided on point difference not points amassed. The fact still remain that regardless of whatever points that City have acquired, we are 12 points worse off, and that is what really matters. They could only have 30 points so far and if we ran them closer with 25 points at this stage, the situation would not be this bad. History is not going to wipe off 12 points. Let's just face the facts.
What ever happened last year is for last year. I don't get it, one moment we should on from previous years when Fergie was in charge, but now let's use the scenarios of those same years to justify this year.
The thing is, there is hardly anyone with the same sentiment calling for us to amount x number of points. League positions and titles are decided on point difference not points amassed. The fact still remain that regardless of whatever points that City have acquired, we are 12 points worse off, and that is what really matters. They could only have 30 points so far and if we ran them closer with 25 points at this stage, the situation would not be this bad. History is not going to wipe off 12 points. Let's just face the facts.
What ever happened last year is for last year. I don't get it, one moment we should on from previous years when Fergie was in charge, but now let's use the scenarios of those same years to justify this year.
And? Should we just quit then? When we were the outstanding team in the league, it never stopped other teams from making it hard for us to pull away. Are just going to add City to the every increasing list of excuses? Are they the reason we are this far behind or should pretend that it's our inability to do better. No one has asked us to win the league and I'm sure none of the posters that have made up this fictitious line have yet to answer @Dobbs. All we ask is to make it difficult for the league leaders after all the money spent. Afterall, José is quick to come out with another "at least" excuse that at least we are better off than 18 other teams despite comfortably outspending 18 other teams. Or is that too much to ask for? Where is the ambition?And this 2017 City team is on a record breaking run. We are not behind just any team.
Even if we were going off past seasons and we were top, I'm sure people would still be pissing about something.
And? Should we just quit then? When we were the outstanding team in the league, it never stopped other teams from making it hard for us to pull away. Are just going to add City to the every increasing list of excuses? Are they the reason we are this far behind or should pretend that it's our inability to do better. No one has asked us to win the league and I'm sure none of the posters that have made up this fictitious line have yet to answer @Dobbs. All we ask is to make it difficult for the league leaders after all the money spent. Afterall, José is quick to come out with another "at least" excuse that at least we are better off than 18 other teams despite comfortably outspending 18 other teams. Or is that too much to ask for? Where is the ambition?
I'm almost certain that if City pull further away, there will still be excuses that our point tally would have won the league in 2005.
Well that's the thing. We aren't terrible but we're not exactly pulling up trees. We are just doing the bare minimum and some fans seem to fully excited by this, which is their choice really. For all of City's brilliance, they are simply operating at the top of their range which is what everyone should look towards.Which has been the best performance so far? CSKA away? Watford away? Arsenal away? Spurs home? There were several 4:0 wins but mostly against modest opposition.
If I'm honest, I'm not very impressed with the performances so far. The results are relatively good. The performances not so much. Winning 3:1 against Arsenal away is a huge result. But anyone who thinks that was a great performance is kidding himself. There were about 5 brilliant counter-attacks. Which is excellent. But conceding 33 attempts wasn't great at all.
I tend to think that the performances are the best predictor of what is to come. The performances have to improve. There have been shades of brilliant counter-attacking football in some games but more is needed. Even with Pogba in the team.
Well that's the thing. We aren't terrible but we're not exactly pulling up trees. We are just doing the bare minimum and some fans seem to fully excited by this, which is their choice really. For all of City's brilliance, they are simply operating at the top of their range which is what everyone should look towards.
Depending on how you see it, our top range may or may not match City's but it is surely closer than this. But then again, what do I know? There are some that would have us believe the level of our players are below Watford and we are massively overachieving at the moment.
Do you not have to consider that other clubs are spending more money as well?
And the rest of the league hasn't spent any money? Your statement assumes that only City and United have spent money so should increase the gap from the others. But that's not true as most teams have spent a tonne of money over the last four years.
They've spent nothing like what United and City have over the last few years.
We've raised the bar on transfer spend during this period so it only makes sense that new record points totals might occur.
They have spent more than what they were spending before though. Your point holds no weight if you are just going to say they have not spent the same as City and United, because the other teams never have done so.
I read it clearly and I know that they've won 16/17 but at some point we going to stop looking at to blame them for where we are and maybe just look at ourselves, right?Are you even reading what people are saying? They have won 16 out of 17 games. The game they drew they had 10 men. This City team is not normal. Which is why our current points total which is usually good enough to be 1st or very close to first is not enough. What do you want people to say?