I think people do accept this, some simply see this as poor preparation to not have someone who can do a similar job to Pogba (not the same quality but the job itself). People keep saying ‘well someone like Pogba won’t sit on the bench’. We don’t need a Pogba to link midfield to attack - it’s poor that we can’t do it without him (rather than us just throwing our hands up and declaring what a great player he is).
There’s bound to be a midfielder (young, learning) that can be his adequate backup.
So yes, it’s an excuse to an extent but it’s not the full picture.
If I am not wrong Jose did suggest Fellaini as a back up to Pogba but the problem is Fellaini has also been injured. Before the season started midfield was our most secured position considering we had 5 midfielders to choose (Carrick,Pogba,Fellaini,Matic and Herrera) but no one would have imagined us losing 3 midfielders at the same with injuries/suspension. And to make matter worse Herrera is having a very mediocre season and Mkhi just went Absent without official leave when we needed him the most.
Do you think City would have won 16 out of 17 games if both Silva/KDB got injured at the same time and Sterling/Sane started having a shocker performance? I dont think so.