VP89
Pogba's biggest fan
- Joined
- Dec 6, 2015
- Messages
- 34,489
Excellent input as always from you.
Like him or loathe him, I think you have to respect Jose for being totally honest about where we are.
The 'heritage' speech about the squad he'd actually inherited was true.
The 'this season will be difficult if we don't buy more players' speech was true.
The 'Pogba needs to more disciplined in his midfield role' speech was true.
The 'Media treat us being 2nd last season as if we were relegated' speech was true.
You can trust what Jose says. As for Woodward and some players, they can't be trusted.
Excellent input as always from you.
The problem I have with pro-Mourinho arguments is that do you really need a world class 11 to beat Brighton? We lost to these small teams last season, and the argument that he needs more players doesnt stack up. Why can't we play cohesive attacking football against even small teams? How does a midfield of Pogba/Fred get dominated by nobodies? I appreciate to challenge City or Real/Barca we need better in defence and on the wings, but to routinely beat teams out of the top 6, surely our team is strong enough. That's where we're falling short, as last season showed (we had a very good record against the top 6).
We barely fashioned any chances against Brighton, who will probably lose 5-0 to liverpool tomorrow, and were lucky against Leicester. Meanwhile arsenal lost to chelsea, but carved them open almost at will and created chances for their strikers. It's got to be the tactics and instructions Jose's giving the players, I cant fathom how we cant even play football against shite teams, and it's been a constant problem under him since day 1.
What relevance does Liverpool have to his post? Hes pretty spot on.
Except he isn't
How has Mourinho done a poor job? He's won us two trophies in his first season and led us to 2nd place last season and the only reason we couldn't compete for the league is because Man City are a financially dopped monster.
Klopp hasn't won anything with Liverpool yet he's lauded by the press for being a failure unless Klopp wins something this season, his glorious tenure as Liverpool manager is more of a failure than Mourinho's time with us.
The reason you think Mourinho's time is a failure with us is because the man has built his career on winning the big trophies and with that comes the added pressure of delivering them at every club you go.
What has he said that's wrong?
Zlatan was signed on a free and I'd rather take him than no established striker whatsoever. Lukaku is 24 and so is Pogba. Fred is 25 and Dalot is 19.
The only 29 yr old players Mourinho signed was Sanchez (as a swap for one of our older players) and Matic (for a great value transfer fee). So no, none of his targets really need to be reigned in. Only Lindelof looks like a big mistake but he was only 23 when we signed him and can still improve massively if you think about that.
A bizzare moan from you. He has drawn a line on transfers since deadline day and hasn't once mentioned players he would like.
He has also refrained from being critical of players who deserve it. You're upset when he's critical and you're upset when he's nice. Good one.
The other type of Fans who want Mourinho Out:
2. Clueless fans:
This is the vast majority of the fans here. The simple minded fans spreading all the negativity with zero logic. The same fans who will switch their tune instantly and sing praise of Mourinho once United beat Tottenham this weekend. Readily jump into these threads moaning about something or the other. They truly don't understand why they want Mourinho out. They barely read what people say or listen to reason. They will say 100 reasons to disagree not one of which would make any meaning (condescending liverpool fan, nonsense/ more nonsense, new members, Mourinho doesnt know to attack, he is a bully, He is not developing youth, he is wasting money in transfers etc. etc.). These are the same people who destroy world democracies, the sheeps of the football world. The papers make money because of them. They are the reason why I go in search of decent forums to have normal football conversation. They populate every major football paper talking about everything meaningless and regurgitate the same crap. ( I am talking to You *****)
I will point some of the most absurd things shared by these people and truly beseech them to read all the posts because most of their concerns are already reasoned by a number of good posts in the forum(like that of Irish Jet, Jezpeza, JK-27, Miscemal, Bobcat, King Kana)
Mourinho doesn't know to attack :
Losing to Brighton, poor preseason etc, doesn't change the fact that he is a winner. Every team loses to some team at some point or the other. It doesnt matter what happens early in the season. It is what happens when the season ends. Manchester United were 2nd last season. You can't reach 2nd fluke-ing your way or defending all the time. If that's the case, a Tony Pulis or Sam Allardyce side would be making it top 4 every single season. To say the Mourinho's team doesn't play football to win or attack is silly.
Mourinho's team don't attack the traditional eye pleasing, easy to understand way Pep/Klopp teams attack. Mourinho's team attacks through percentage football by creating chaos in the final third. Not every team can do that. Unlike what majority of you think It needs tactical discipline and great individual skill. There are 2 parts to Mourinho's team -
1. Absolute defense is not a joke: It needs extreme care and planning to nullify different types of oppositions, from long ball playing Conte, to counter attacking Klopp and possesion based Pep, Mourinho's team lay huge emphasis on how to neutralize oppositions.
2. Chaos football: I can go to great lengths to explain this, the fact is, Mourinho's team attack in an atypical way, were the ball is played at the oppositions final third in uncomfortable angles and irrespective of how skilled the defenders may be, there is always the possibility of nicking a goal. It breaches the midfield line and goes straight to the attacking third. From finding the target man, target man positioning off the ball, target man knocking zones, where to make the runs, guessing the 2nd balls, preventing the counter etc...
Though not a style for the football purists, it needs considerable tactics and individual skill to execute. It has a very high percentage of success and must not be dismissed as a simple hoof-ball
It's hard for normal fans to understand and appreciate this kind of football. But to say the guy doesn't know to attack (like a Tony Pulis or a Sam Allardyce side hoofing the ball to the tallest guy without purpose) is an insult to intelligence.
Mourinho spent lot of money:
This is true for his previous tenures at Chelsea, Inter (not so much) and Madrid. But at United he hardly has his team. A number of intelligent posts here address this aspect. I have also explained this in my previous posts in this thread. The fact is, this team is not completely a Mourinho team. I am not saying this to find excuses. Mourinho reached 2nd with this team. To say he didn't get best out of this team is being naive. This team can only go that far. If you truly want to challenge City, I say give him what he needs. I am certain he will come out firing. I don't expect much from United this season. They failed him in the Transfer Market. The least the fans could do is back him here in the cafe until he leaves.
Mourinho bullying young players:
Pogba and Martial are not the gods you are making them to be. If you are afraid that they might leave and it will be a big loss for united, you are mistaken. These players are truly the balotelli type. They are under-performing 19 year olds with a lot of cash and fame. Sir Alex would have thrown the whole kitchen sink at them to get them performing. Roy Keane would have stripped them naked for their antics. Don't side with Pogba (and the vile Railoa) and the AWOL Martial. Under any of the current top managers these 2 would be benched. To say Mourinho method is old school is again finding excuse without reason.
I am not supporting him blindly. I hardly like Mourinho. I am merely stating facts from purely a football perspective. Mourinho is a winner. Don't over react and give him time and judge him end of the season.
Here’s my last allowed post of the day. Mate well said. They won’t like it and will throw all sorts of abuse at you but it is what is. How dare you tell them like it is?
Have you played football cos it seems like you have. Majority of people I have come across on this forum who share such intellect and reasoning aren’t mere fans. Some of them have played or are playing the game at some semi competitive level and seem to appreciate the inner workings of the sport and show a level of understanding of what might be going on etc. I for one have played this game and I tell you, a lot that’s been happening on the pitch here isn’t as bad as people are making it seem. Yes, several players need to up their game and the manager needs to find ways to fire them up but you don’t come second playing utter shit. It just doesn’t happen. Otherwise Moyes would’ve done it.
Good post.
Always amusing when a newbie pops up claiming to have higher knowledge/intellect and taking potshots at others despite coming across as very obvious bias.The other type of Fans who want Mourinho Out:
2. Clueless fans:
This is the vast majority of the fans here. The simple minded fans spreading all the negativity with zero logic. The same fans who will switch their tune instantly and sing praise of Mourinho once United beat Tottenham this weekend. Readily jump into these threads moaning about something or the other. They truly don't understand why they want Mourinho out. They barely read what people say or listen to reason. They will say 100 reasons to disagree not one of which would make any meaning (condescending liverpool fan, nonsense/ more nonsense, new members, Mourinho doesnt know to attack, he is a bully, He is not developing youth, he is wasting money in transfers etc. etc.). These are the same people who destroy world democracies, the sheeps of the football world. The papers make money because of them. They are the reason why I go in search of decent forums to have normal football conversation. They populate every major football paper talking about everything meaningless and regurgitate the same crap. ( I am talking to You *****)
I will point some of the most absurd things shared by these people and truly beseech them to read all the posts because most of their concerns are already reasoned by a number of good posts in the forum(like that of Irish Jet, Jezpeza, JK-27, Miscemal, Bobcat, King Kana)
Mourinho doesn't know to attack :
Losing to Brighton, poor preseason etc, doesn't change the fact that he is a winner. Every team loses to some team at some point or the other. It doesnt matter what happens early in the season. It is what happens when the season ends. Manchester United were 2nd last season. You can't reach 2nd fluke-ing your way or defending all the time. If that's the case, a Tony Pulis or Sam Allardyce side would be making it top 4 every single season. To say the Mourinho's team doesn't play football to win or attack is silly.
Mourinho's team don't attack the traditional eye pleasing, easy to understand way Pep/Klopp teams attack. Mourinho's team attacks through percentage football by creating chaos in the final third. Not every team can do that. Unlike what majority of you think It needs tactical discipline and great individual skill. There are 2 parts to Mourinho's team -
1. Absolute defense is not a joke: It needs extreme care and planning to nullify different types of oppositions, from long ball playing Conte, to counter attacking Klopp and possesion based Pep, Mourinho's team lay huge emphasis on how to neutralize oppositions.
2. Chaos football: I can go to great lengths to explain this, the fact is, Mourinho's team attack in an atypical way, were the ball is played at the oppositions final third in uncomfortable angles and irrespective of how skilled the defenders may be, there is always the possibility of nicking a goal. It breaches the midfield line and goes straight to the attacking third. From finding the target man, target man positioning off the ball, target man knocking zones, where to make the runs, guessing the 2nd balls, preventing the counter etc...
Though not a style for the football purists, it needs considerable tactics and individual skill to execute. It has a very high percentage of success and must not be dismissed as a simple hoof-ball
It's hard for normal fans to understand and appreciate this kind of football. But to say the guy doesn't know to attack (like a Tony Pulis or a Sam Allardyce side hoofing the ball to the tallest guy without purpose) is an insult to intelligence.
Mourinho spent lot of money:
This is true for his previous tenures at Chelsea, Inter (not so much) and Madrid. But at United he hardly has his team. A number of intelligent posts here address this aspect. I have also explained this in my previous posts in this thread. The fact is, this team is not completely a Mourinho team. I am not saying this to find excuses. Mourinho reached 2nd with this team. To say he didn't get best out of this team is being naive. This team can only go that far. If you truly want to challenge City, I say give him what he needs. I am certain he will come out firing. I don't expect much from United this season. They failed him in the Transfer Market. The least the fans could do is back him here in the cafe until he leaves.
Mourinho bullying young players:
Pogba and Martial are not the gods you are making them to be. If you are afraid that they might leave and it will be a big loss for united, you are mistaken. These players are truly the balotelli type. They are under-performing 19 year olds with a lot of cash and fame. Sir Alex would have thrown the whole kitchen sink at them to get them performing. Roy Keane would have stripped them naked for their antics. Don't side with Pogba (and the vile Railoa) and the AWOL Martial. Under any of the current top managers these 2 would be benched. To say Mourinho method is old school is again finding excuse without reason.
I am not supporting him blindly. I hardly like Mourinho. I am merely stating facts from purely a football perspective. Mourinho is a winner. Don't over react and give him time and judge him end of the season.
This whole section for one. Mourinho doesn't know to attack :
Completely misses the point, as even with Jose chaos football, he isn't getting it right at United.
His early Chelsea side, Inter side, and Real side had functioning and coherent attacking units even if he did have a defensive setup with some of those sides.
We have not and do not look like we have a coherent setup let alone a coherent attacking setup. We're also not able to get the most our of our attacking players (Like he did at his pervious clubs)
The issue isn't anything to do with whether its pleasant on the eye or not, the issue is its not working. His first Chelsea side were great to watch when they went for it, as were Madrid.
The issue is some people are wondering whether the Jose of old is outdated, and can he or has he been able to adapt.
Everyone remembers what Wenger was like 15 years ago, but he failed to adapt to the times, and the question many are asking is is the same happening to Jose, which is a fair question
Also I disagree most fans will be signing Jose praises if we beat Spurs which is in one of his first sentences. The mood was negative at the end of last season even with match going fans and thats after we came second.
EDIT: The main issue is people just can't be objective, its like your either Jose is great or Jose is rubbish.
Yes Jose was a great manager, maybe he still is, what is clear though is at United so far he has not been able to sort out our attacking play over a sustained period of time. We have looked good in the odd game and especially at the start of last season, but thats about it.
So after 2 seasons, people are well within their rights to question his attacking tactics. Its clear if you look at his past exploits and this United side that its not working.
The bolding option isn't working on my phone but this is a strange line of argument.The problem is this is the weakest club (maybe bar Inter) he took over. It needed a serious overhaul whilst competing with oil money. It would be ridiculous to demand a cohesive machine after 2 seasons when the man walked in with no proper cb partnership, no striker, no fecking midfielders and so on.
Very bizzare you draw parallels to Wenger. Mourinho has delivered silverware in his 2nd season and finished higher than Wenger did in most of his last 10 seasons FFS. If Jose was so outdated and inept then he wouldn't have dragged our side to 2nd place last season. You don't get to 2nd place in the Premier League using dinosaur tactics. Especially not in today's day and age. It's just more sensationalist bullshit.
Well this is it isn't it? You don't look at context whatsoever. Ignore the fact that he's overhauled his backroom staff, has 3 major players due back from injury and note that he has one or two prima Donna's on the club to handle, you just say "2 seasons. Not good attacking. Should be questioned".
Im sorry that's just utter tripe. He wasn't terrible in approach in the first season, and for the first half of last season he was doing absolutely fine in all areas. It was when Huddersfield away happened and where we lost most our midfield to long term injuries that shit started falling apart.
Yeah, he was off the mark in occasional games tactically too but I'm not going to walk into 2 games this season and pretend that he's a bad manager or that he's lost it. If he didn't want to adapt or was stuck in his ways, he wouldn't have brought in a coach like McKenna to have a say on the first team.
The bolding option isn't working on my phone but this is a strange line of argument.
Questioning the work he's done with our attack is apparently "utter tripe". Next, you'll be telling us how questioning the fluidity of our football is "a calamity". No need to be so precious. We haven't hit the mark as an attacking force under a manager who is given plenty to spend. So of course our attack and the manager managing our attack has to be questioned. Some people seem to think Mourinho is managing Stoke.
The problem is this is the weakest club (maybe bar Inter) he took over. It needed a serious overhaul whilst competing with oil money. It would be ridiculous to demand a cohesive machine after 2 seasons when the man walked in with no proper cb partnership, no striker, no fecking midfielders and so on.
Very bizzare you draw parallels to Wenger. Mourinho has delivered silverware in his 2nd season and finished higher than Wenger did in most of his last 10 seasons FFS. If Jose was so outdated and inept then he wouldn't have dragged our side to 2nd place last season. You don't get to 2nd place in the Premier League using dinosaur tactics. Especially not in today's day and age. It's just more sensationalist bullshit.
I am not talking about the Brighton game, again the context is the 2 season, it hasn't been good in an attacking sense, so questions are asked.Well this is it isn't it? You don't look at context whatsoever. Ignore the fact that he's overhauled his backroom staff, has 3 major players due back from injury and note that he has one or two prima Donna's on the club to handle, you just say "2 seasons. Not good attacking. Should be questioned".
Im sorry that's just utter tripe. He wasn't terrible in approach in the first season, and for the first half of last season he was doing absolutely fine in all areas. It was when Huddersfield away happened and where we lost most our midfield to long term injuries that shit started falling apart.
Yeah, he was off the mark in occasional games tactically too but I'm not going to walk into 2 games this season and pretend that he's a bad manager or that he's lost it. If he didn't want to adapt or was stuck in his ways, he wouldn't have brought in a coach like McKenna to have a say on the first team.
Like him or loathe him, I think you have to respect Jose for being totally honest about where we are.
The 'heritage' speech about the squad he'd actually inherited was true.
The 'this season will be difficult if we don't buy more players' speech was true.
The 'Pogba needs to more disciplined in his midfield role' speech was true.
The 'Media treat us being 2nd last season as if we were relegated' speech was true.
You can trust what Jose says. As for Woodward and some players, they can't be trusted.
Phil follows Gary in defending Mourinho. Doesn't seem like the class of 92 think Mourinho is the problem at Man Utd.
He isn't spot on because there are definitely more reasons as to why some fans would want Mourinho to leave the club. It's very arrogant to just assume things like that.He's not trolling and he's spot on.
Actually Zlatan was a great signing and I wish we had someone like him in the team right now.
He’s actually been fine with the young players. Rashford got plenty of time, Martial got his chances, McTominay has been pulled out of nowhere and Lingard has turned into a properly good footballer. Pereira has been integrated into the team this year too. I know the perception is that we used to promote 5 players a year into first team but truth is the current rate at which they are getting promoted is pretty much the par for us.
There are many sticks to beat Mourinho with and I think he should go as well (for slightly different reasons) but the witch hunt and the hate he is getting is ridiculous.
Like him or loathe him, I think you have to respect Jose for being totally honest about where we are.
The 'heritage' speech about the squad he'd actually inherited was true.
The 'this season will be difficult if we don't buy more players' speech was true.
The 'Pogba needs to more disciplined in his midfield role' speech was true.
The 'Media treat us being 2nd last season as if we were relegated' speech was true.
You can trust what Jose says. As for Woodward and some players, they can't be trusted.
Like him or loathe him, I think you have to respect Jose for being totally honest about where we are.
The 'heritage' speech about the squad he'd actually inherited was true.
The 'this season will be difficult if we don't buy more players' speech was true.
The 'Pogba needs to more disciplined in his midfield role' speech was true.
The 'Media treat us being 2nd last season as if we were relegated' speech was true.
You can trust what Jose says. As for Woodward and some players, they can't be trusted.
What about the comments on the tour though?
Don't you think that was a little insight into his views on not buying/playing the finished article?
Plus, for every player you name that he has introduced or improved I could probably name you two or three that have regressed under him.
In fact, two of them that you name, Martial and Rashford have, most ppl would say, gone backwards under him.
So that leaves Lingard and McTominay that he's improved, is it any wonder we look bang average?
He is the manager, it is his job to make sure that we have a good season, no manager gets every player they want. That is the reason he is one of the highest paid managers around, to perform better and get more out of the squad than other managers.
This is a good point. If the job at United is tougher than any of the other top clubs, then he's being paid the equivalent of Guardiola (15 million per year, isn't it?) to compensate for the nature of the job. His complaining is justified if he was earning only as much as Poch, Klopp or other managers, but to earn the highest salary for a manager in the world, you better do something special.
Pochettino hasn't actually come out and complained about Levy, and you can argue he was really hard done by, having been promised signings and yet gotten nothing. Out of every 5 clubs, atleast 4 are inefficiently run in some way or other, its' not like every club but United operates as well as City or Liverpool do. So managers have to suck it up considering the wages they get.
Mourinho finished second last year to a team that is clearly, clearly superior. Just because you earn a lot doesn't mean you're going to pull off all the wins because at the end of the day, a manager is only as good as the players they have at their disposal. Mourinho obviously achieved a really good position last year, best of the rest due to City storming the league.
Then you look at Liverpool, how they have clearly strengthened their squad compared to United. The top managers know the minimum requirements needed in order to win and right now United under Jose do not meet those minimum requires from a player quality, player mentality and player consistency stand point. He'll continue to manage the squad as he sees best to get the points.
Nobody asked him to win the league. Only that, after 2 years, one should atleast see some cohesion in the attack. With Klopp, Liverpool finished 8th, 4th and 4th, but the team cohesion was there to see. Of course, Klopp has other faults, like being a finals bottler, but that is irrelevant here - look at how Firmino has an understanding with the wingers, and how their midfield links up with the forwards. The simple point is, why can't Jose orchestrate a sharp, fluid, fast attack with Lukaku, Pogba, Lingard, Sanchez and Matic holding? Its' the bare minimum.
We look like a rich man's Sunderland despite coming 2nd last season.
You’re clearly out of the touch with people wanting Jose out from the club, I can reassure few expect us to challenge. However, most fans simply want at last to see some excitement and joy back in watching United play because it has been an absolute chore. I willing to bet most even don’t mind defensive football if it’s actually implemented well and we resemble a coherent unit on the pitch. We on the other hand are simply relying on individual brilliance to bail as out time and time again which masked a lot of our poor performances as there’s no actual plan on the pitch. Anyone with a brain watching us could tell from afar it’s not sustainable and we’re gonna get find out sooner rather than later without a real shit in tactics, training and system.People are asking him to win the league though. Already won a domestic cup, went to another domestic cup final last year, won a Europa League trophy. The only step now from 2nd is winning the league, what's so hard to accept? That's the barometer. Give Jose 2 years with the necessary players needed. Lukaku going into his second year. Sanchez going into his 8th month with the team. Pogba is not an attacking midfielder, he's stated that over and over himself. He's an orthodox central midfielder who impacts the game from the center.
Jose has his way of playing his team and it's not for everyone. But what we cannot doubt is how he's improved the squad, won with the squad and the improved results since he's been in charge. Whoever the next manager is, they better win the league with the squad they will inherit plus a few signings under him.
Ellis Short is a/was a rich man with multiple managers under his tenure and look where Sunderland is now (just look down, down the English Football pyramid). It's a poor comparison. United have performed well to finish 2nd to one of the best teams in Premier League history over the course of 38 matches. Better than Liverpool, better than Chelsea, better than Spurs, etc. Liverpool have a better attack, Chelsea have Hazard/Kante, Spurs have Kane and Eriksen. It's not as if United finished above these gobshite teams by luck.
People are asking him to win the league though. Already won a domestic cup, went to another domestic cup final last year, won a Europa League trophy. The only step now from 2nd is winning the league, what's so hard to accept? That's the barometer. Give Jose 2 years with the necessary players needed. Lukaku going into his second year. Sanchez going into his 8th month with the team. Pogba is not an attacking midfielder, he's stated that over and over himself. He's an orthodox central midfielder who impacts the game from the center.
Jose has his way of playing his team and it's not for everyone. But what we cannot doubt is how he's improved the squad, won with the squad and the improved results since he's been in charge. Whoever the next manager is, they better win the league with the squad they will inherit plus a few signings under him.
Ellis Short is a/was a rich man with multiple managers under his tenure and look where Sunderland is now (just look down, down the English Football pyramid). It's a poor comparison. United have performed well to finish 2nd to one of the best teams in Premier League history over the course of 38 matches. Better than Liverpool, better than Chelsea, better than Spurs, etc. Liverpool have a better attack, Chelsea have Hazard/Kante, Spurs have Kane and Eriksen. It's not as if United finished above these gobshite teams by luck.
You’re clearly out of the touch with people wanting Jose out from the club, I can reassure few expect us to challenge. However, most fans simply want at last to see some excitement and joy back in watching United play because it has been an absolute chore. I willing to bet most even don’t mind defensive football if it’s actually implemented well and we resemble a coherent unit on the pitch. We on the other hand are simply relying on individual brilliance to bail as out time and time again which masked a lot of our poor performances as there’s no actual plan on the pitch. Anyone with a brain watching us could tell from afar it’s not sustainable and we’re gonna get find out sooner rather than later without a real shit in tactics, training and system.
But you can only beat what is in front of you, and so I am not knocking it. I am also not spoilt; fully appreciate the importance of silverware and cherish it. However, it cannot be used to judge our style of play/progress etc. The league and CL are barometers and the Sevilla game and the idiotic LvGesque football heritage rant took away whatever credit Jose earned with those cups. Blank slate now.
Nope, they are asking him to make sure that our attack plays cohesively and not look like a bunch of individuals thrown onto the pitch. Firstly, the only reason we finished 2nd was because Liverpool had a thin squad and thus threw away some games at the end. By my estimation, we are the 3rd best team and that has been reinforced this season, thanks to Ed's feck ups and Liverpool themselves strengthening further. Maybe 4th best this season if Sarri gets Chelsea going.
Secondly, and apologies for comparing our rivals Liverpool again -- they finished 20 odd points behind City as well. But notice how much happier they are? Reason is because their football is good and there is a direction. Jose, despite finishing 2nd with the team, looks clueless, the team is rudderless and the style of play is horrific. If we had played some decent stuff, nobody would be complaining about finishing 19 points behind a team that bought the league.
You can't tell me that pacy, quick football is impossible with the forward line we have, the weak right flank not withstanding. Forget that, we look worse than relegation threatened teams at times. I think we are the only top club in the world that phones in a performance equalling peak Sunderland in some games.
Regarding the cups, the LC and EL were two of the most tedious wins in all honesty. We were a Guidetti goal away from crashing out of the EL. Of course, full credit to Jose, but cup competitions do have the luck element and do not serve as a barometer for progress, unless they have the quality of the CL. Both the LC and EL runs were full of mediocre/average teams.
But you can only beat what is in front of you, and so I am not knocking it. I am also not spoilt; fully appreciate the importance of silverware and cherish it. However, it cannot be used to judge our style of play/progress etc. The league and CL are barometers and the Sevilla game and the idiotic LvGesque football heritage rant took away whatever credit Jose earned with those cups. Blank slate now.
Jose had his way of playing at Madrid and Chelsea. But at United, he looks lost. We haven't played either counter attacking football, or park-the-bus at all times. It is some ugly mess that nobody can pinpoint exactly what it is.
Secondly, has he improved the squad? He himself has little trust in Bailly and Lindelof. Lukaku, Matic and Pogba are improvements from the LvG era. Out of that, he's already fallen out with Pogba so much that the latter is agitating for a move. Matic will give us 2 more years tops. That leaves Lukaku. But season's still young, we will see if Sanchez, Fred and Dalot atleast do something useful.
Chelsea had Hazard and Kante, but we too have Lukaku and Matic, two regular 7/10 performers minimum. Chelsea's squad is as bad as ours in other areas, but within weeks Sarri's infused an identity with them. Liverpool are better than us and were better last season, it hurts me to concede.
This. Even if Jose adopted a method like Simeone, atleast it signifies some sort of direction. And if you argue he can't do it as he has bad defenders, well fair fecks --- why not coach the attack properly to make up for it? The attack is not at all coached, and that is the main problem 90% of the people have with Jose.
Klopp has his direction because he's a good manager combined with a club that has back him 100% in the transfer market, full stop. He's also entering his 4th year with Liverpool if I recall correctly. There's been complete continuity under his managerial time, something that is completely opposite compared to United and that's down to both Jose and the board. It's fecking a sad state of affairs not including all the BS the media spits out. Jose is a good manager and much more successful than Klopp, yet it doesn't seem that way. It's odd.
The way Liverpool play cannot work currently at United, unless you omit Pogba. Our midfield trio, collectively, are not agile enough and most importantly, do not work as a unit to press, disrupt, gain possession of the ball and then play it quickly into space behind the opposition. It's a thankless job. Pogba will never be that player, never. Matic can be the base anchor, especially if Henderson can do it, Matic can. Fred has some qualities of that type of central midfield player Liverpool play under Klopp
I do not pay any attention to preseason.
I am looking forward to your list of about a dozen players that he has made noticeably worse. I can name Shaw that has regressed and maybe Martial (not sure, I think he’s the same player he was, just hasn’t progressed) both of whom have had clear attitude issues too.
I personally don't care about pre season results either, however I take exception to our manager basically saying that the squad we took with us was rubbish.
In fact, I'd call out any supposed manager/leader of any organisation who unjustly tears into a group of young lads who are only learning their trade, that's seriously crossing a line IMO.
Plus, it was Mourinhio who made a big deal out of players who missed the tour because of the world cup, nobody else really cared because, as we both agree, its only pre season.
Not sure if you're winding me up or not by suggesting it would be difficult to name a dozen players who have failed to make any progress under Jose since he joined.
Anyway, here goes:
De Gea, Shaw, Smalling, Jones, Lindelof, Baily, Blind, Darmian, Herrerea, Martial, Mkthytrian, Rashford, Sanchez, Lukaku, Fosu-Menshah, Pogba.
(Probably forgetting more)
For various reasons, I would genuinely argue not one player out of the above fulfilled the potential we all thought they had, under Mourinhio.
BTW, I'm not suggesting it's all his fault, the players have to take some of the responsibility, I'm just answering your question.
Those post match comments were truly disgraceful. Here the manager of Manchester United was having a go at the club and it's fans because of their expectations moments after going out in the 1st knockout round after more than questionable tactical decision making on his end.
He publicly mocked the club and it's history all in an effort to shield himself from criticism,it was gutless and was where he finally lost me.
How so many have flipped it by implying that fed up fans somehow don't care about the club is especially rich as they contort themselves to defend a man who cares about himself and his ego more than anything else