Why are you trying to dodge from what we originally talked about? You said our season was over when we brought Sanchez which was simply not the case. What happened afterwards doesn't really matter, does it?
I've said already, only a fool would think we were still in title race back in january. What happened after does matter as it proves the point.
For Mikhi to be sold, you have to have someone who'd want him. Our season was not over. Mikhi was not needed and we needed Sanchez. That's it.
What is important is that Jose wasted almost 30m on Micki and according to you he was worth hardly anything after just a year.
What are you trying to even say here? In the grand scheme of things Lukaku was definitely not that of a crazy transfer considering what is going on in transfer market
Do you have a example? An example of a more expensive transfer (not less expensive) for a player of a same level or worse.
Coutinho went for $170 million. If it was Jose, he would have sold him and laughed his way to the bank. You're making it like Klopp got a bad deal here. For that kind of money you expect Ronaldo or a Messi, or Liverpool's Suarez at least. Coutinho was nothing really amazing. Jose was in that position, just not in united
And when was Jose in that position exactly? He left Porto with all their transfers. Chelsea never sold their prize assets. Inter was selling everyone after Jose left.
Since Porto time, that was a long, long time ago, Jose never even worked a season under any kind of financial strain from the club. And all the clubs he went to spent hundred millions of new players.
We are not talking about how impressed Jose is, we're talking about how well he is backed compared to Moyes.
Extremely better.
Ok, let's see their first season signings. Jose brought: Baily for 30 million, Pogba for 90 million, Zlatan on free and Mikhi for 30 million. He sold lots of youngsters, if going by the price that McNair went out, for 6 million or less. Schniederlin for 25 million, Depay for 15 million with addons. He also let go of Schweinsteiger and Valdes who were probably on massive wages. Basically making his transfer expenditures at 104 million, and if we add Valdes and Schweinsteiger's wages, as well as the numerous players like McNair he sold, much less than 104 million.
In comparison to Moyes - we brought Fellaini for 30 million and Mata for 40 million. We sold no notable players. That makes it 70 million
For 30 million or less, with no accounting to inflation and the fact that Jose inherited us when we were in deep shit - out of the CL and in desparate attempt of getting back there while we were comfortable champions under Moyes... And you have the gall, seriously, to say that Moyes didn't get backed? It's really insane, if you ask me. For 30 million more we brought Pogba, Zlatan, Mikhi and Baily - in comparison to Fellaini and Mata (a player who was brought in probably the only position that we needed no immediate improvement).
Wow... Just wow.
First of all, it's incredibly stupid to talk about 'wages saved' and then write that Zlatan came for 'free'. His signing bonus and wages we paid him were astronomical. Just so you know, our wage bill rose quite a lot under Jose. In the first year from ~230m to 260m and in the second (the data for full year is not available) we are likely to reach 300m a year.
According to transfermarket Moyes's season came with net 75m spent, 45 of that in january. While Jose's first season was a net spend of 140m not counting Ibra who's cost us a lot in terms of expenses. But i can easily let it slide, since even considering that Ibra cost United nothing, Jose still spent twice the money Moyes did. And 140m net spending is a rather significant backing.
You're comparing Liverpool, who are a much smaller club financially than us, to us. This is stupid.
Yet they compete with us for players and on the field, so it's not stupid. Stupid would be comparing us to Watford or Burnley. Also it does not matter where club gets the money or how. Some get them from owner 'loans', but the main thing is how much club spends on players and the respective results shown.
Our metric has been very poor, we spent more than anyone else apart from City. City overspend us but they are actually playing way better football, winning titles. I'd say that in terms of financial return, points gained for money spent (on transfers and wages) we are behind almost everybody. I would not be surprised even if we are bottom of the league in that terms. Our efficiency has been awful.