John Murtough Sack Watch

I don’t disagree that we hugely overpaid but that is on the club and hierarchy not the player himself. It’s way too early to judge him. He was always supposed to be the young back-up prospect with an experienced player coming in too, but we were sold a pup by the club and media. If Arnold and the Glazers grew a pair and negotiated hard with Levy we might have got Kane and good god how amazing would that have been.
Harsh to call Rasmus average though.
A 20 year-old with 9 goals who no one has heard of 6 months ago. Bought by Atalanta last summer. Hs marker value back then? 4.5 million euros. Oh, we overpaid alright. Even for our standards.
 
A 20 year-old with 9 goals who no one has heard of 6 months ago. Bought by Atalanta last summer. Hs marker value back then? 4.5 million euros. Oh, we overpaid alright. Even for our standards.
That’s because we do things in the transfer market that others don’t even dream of don’t forget….. :rolleyes:
 
Every know in the last summer that we need a proven ST. Last season we struggled to score and were lucky that Rashford was on purple patch. Everyone also know that a 20 year old can't be leading a club as big as Man Utd week in week out.

Murtough did exactly the opposite and splashed big money on Hojlund. What a genius DOF.
 
This guy has been hiding behind Woodworth for years. And his supporters always push all the blame to Woodworth for his many failures.

Now, Woodworth is long gone but the problems at the club are still exactly the same. I think Murtough has been in charge of "football side" under Woodworth all the while and hence there is no difference whether Woodworth is still here or not.

Woodworth knows nothing about football and I think he relied largely on Murtough. As I said, I think the trio of Woodworth, Arnold and Murtough should all go in order to have any meaningful changes

https://www.skysports.com/football/...ing-him-would-solve-nothing-says-gary-neville
 
Is Hojlund an average player? Or is he just too young and inexperienced to be relied upon week in week out in the PL? Because the latter is on the club.
Right now, he is a way below-average EPL striker. I have yet to see anything from him that he will be any good. Young Martial, Rashford, Greenwood were miles better at this stage of their career.
 
This guy has been hiding behind Woodworth for years. And his supporters always push all the blame to Woodworth for his many failures.

Now, Woodworth is long gone but the problems at the club are still exactly the same. I think Murtough has been in charge of "football side" under Woodworth all the while and hence there is no difference whether Woodworth is still here or not.

Woodworth knows nothing about football and I think he relied largely on Murtough. As I said, I think the trio of Woodworth, Arnold and Murtough should all go in order to have any meaningful changes

https://www.skysports.com/football/...ing-him-would-solve-nothing-says-gary-neville
We don’t know who woodworth is, perhaps that’s why he’s good at hiding. We can’t find him!

by the way Woodward is long gone, Arnold is gone (gardening leave) already
 
This guy has been hiding behind Woodworth for years. And his supporters always push all the blame to Woodworth for his many failures.

Now, Woodworth is long gone but the problems at the club are still exactly the same. I think Murtough has been in charge of "football side" under Woodworth all the while and hence there is no difference whether Woodworth is still here or not.

Woodworth knows nothing about football and I think he relied largely on Murtough. As I said, I think the trio of Woodworth, Arnold and Murtough should all go in order to have any meaningful changes

https://www.skysports.com/football/...ing-him-would-solve-nothing-says-gary-neville
I agree but I couldn't help have a chuckle at you getting Woodward's name wrong not once not twice but seven times in your post. :lol:
 
They’re all toast if Sir Jim comes in. Easiest and cheapest way to get fans onside, Murtough’s head on a spit outside OT.
 
This guy has been hiding behind Woodworth for years. And his supporters always push all the blame to Woodworth for his many failures.

Now, Woodworth is long gone but the problems at the club are still exactly the same. I think Murtough has been in charge of "football side" under Woodworth all the while and hence there is no difference whether Woodworth is still here or not.

Woodworth knows nothing about football and I think he relied largely on Murtough. As I said, I think the trio of Woodworth, Arnold and Murtough should all go in order to have any meaningful changes

https://www.skysports.com/football/...ing-him-would-solve-nothing-says-gary-neville
Murtough barely became a DoF by the time Woodward was sacked. It all happened in the same season, what are you on about? Woodward called all the shots for all those years up to the season he was sacked.
 
This guy has been hiding behind Woodworth for years. And his supporters always push all the blame to Woodworth for his many failures.

Now, Woodworth is long gone but the problems at the club are still exactly the same. I think Murtough has been in charge of "football side" under Woodworth all the while and hence there is no difference whether Woodworth is still here or not.

Woodworth knows nothing about football and I think he relied largely on Murtough. As I said, I think the trio of Woodworth, Arnold and Murtough should all go in order to have any meaningful changes

https://www.skysports.com/football/...ing-him-would-solve-nothing-says-gary-neville

:lol: :lol: Seven times. Come on man.
 
The Athletic seem to have gone quite tough on Murtough.
 


It basically confirmed my fears about Murtough. Its surprisingly how many excellent posters (no sarcasm here) had decided to die on that particular hill considering who hired the guy in the first place. Had Woodward ever done a solid football decision to start with?
 
Seems to miss out the bit when Ten Hag got us to sack Ralf Rangnick who would've had a lot of these alleged things.
 
Seems to miss out the bit when Ten Hag got us to sack Ralf Rangnick who would've had a lot of these alleged things.

I very much doubt that Rangnick was sacked on ETH's instructions. I believe that Ralf's career at United was doomed the moment he uttered the famous open heart surgery quote.
 
Seems to miss out the bit when Ten Hag got us to sack Ralf Rangnick who would've had a lot of these alleged things.

Yes, but to me that is also indicative of the structural failures of the club. Not that ten Have was right, and I agree Rangnick would have been a major improvement.
 
It basically confirmed my fears about Murtough. Its surprisingly how many excellent posters (no sarcasm here) had decided to die on that particular hill considering who hired the guy in the first place. Had Woodward ever done a solid football decision to start with?

Doesn't take a genius to realise he is inept at his responsibilities just a little critical thinking. Competence is easily discerned in management.
 
They’re all toast if Sir Jim comes in. Easiest and cheapest way to get fans onside, Murtough’s head on a spit outside OT.

We hope
2D28F15B00000578-0-image-a-19_1444213140944.jpg
 
Doesn't take a genius to realise he is inept at his responsibilities just a little critical thinking. Competence is easily discerned in management.

Woodward was without doubt clueless in football. Every man and his dog accepted that. What I fount shocking is that there were very valid people who believed that he was somehow able to appoint the right DOF for us. That's quite shocking considering that the DOF was supposed to be somehow at the top of our football pyramid.
 
The bit I most agree with is, that the club is so, so easily swayed by public perception and that drives a lot of the decision making. It's funny, how the same people crying about the lack of structure would've been singing "back the manager", "needs his own players", "manager must have the final say" off the hymn sheet just a year ago which is precisely how the club has acted.

The other aspect of it is, that the fans and the overwhelming public perception has always ended up on the wrong side of the arguement in the last 10 years. So the weak leadership were led by a very poor but vocal fanbase that is completely out of touch with modern football.
 
What happens when you give out key jobs to idiots who have no experience in the field or competence to learn

That's a bit much. His background is not too dissimilar to Ashworth's. DOF may not be the role for him but we are talking about someone with experience in the field and presumably not an idiot otherwise he wouldn't have been appointed as the the PL Head of elite development, he also did a good job restructuring our academy.
 
What happens when you give out key jobs to idiots who have no experience in the field or competence to learn

I was always critical towards Murtough's appointment. I thought that he was a Woodward's crony and he lacked the experience to cover such sensitive role especially considering that he'll probably would get little support from the top brass. However tbf to him, SAF left us an extremely outdated system to work with. Don't take me wrong, its suited him because that meant less red tape for him. However it was evident that once SAF gone, United would be left with a crater on the football side of things. Which is why I wanted the best in class in the role. Resistance to change was imminent and as said backing from the top was set to be close to nil. We needed people to come in, who knew how to handle the huge expectations and had the reputation to work with the likes of SAF and earn his reputation. The Everton guy wasn't that man. Its like having Silvester Stallone discussing boxing with the likes of Holyfield, Foreman and Tyson.
 
What happens when you give out key jobs to idiots who have no experience in the field or competence to learn
This is always more damning. Getting a job beyond your station and growing into it is perfectly doable, that we have so many at the club who cannot shows doubly dire assessors who should be chopped too.
 
That's a bit much. His background is not too dissimilar to Ashworth's. DOF may not be the role for him but we are talking about someone with experience in the field and presumably not an idiot otherwise he wouldn't have been appointed as the the PL Head of elite development, he also did a good job restructuring our academy.

Murtough's experience was in the academy. Ashworth's role, particularly at Brighton focused on recruitment. Recruitment especially in today's football is no joke. There's so much to take in account including the player's character, if his skills matches what the manager wants, if the player is available (and the club needs to know that asap else other club will have more time to 'court' him) and how to negotiate a deal. You also have to have the right people to handle various aspects of the deal including scouting (thus you always have a plan B and a Plan C if needed) and negotiating. Its evident that Murtough was out of depth on that regard
 
Murtough's experience was in the academy. Ashworth's role, particularly at Brighton focused on recruitment. Recruitment especially in today's football is no joke. There's so much to take in account including the player's character, if his skills matches what the manager wants, if the player is available (and the club needs to know that asap else other club will have more time to 'court' him) and how to negotiate a deal. You also have to have the right people to handle various aspects of the deal including scouting (thus you always have a plan B and a Plan C if needed) and negotiating. Its evident that Murtough was out of depth on that regard

Both of their experience was at academy level before becoming head of elite development, Murtough was also a football analyst for Everton including on the recruitment side of things. Their background while not identical are similar up until the point where they each get a sporting director job.

The point being that the issue with Murtough isn't his background or his experience, he simply happens to not be a good sporting director. It's not rare for people to deserve a chance in a different role but end up not being a good fit. We can be critical of Murtough without pretending that he didn't have experience in the field and also was competent in his roles.
 
Both of their experience was at academy level before becoming head of elite development, Murtough was also a football analyst for Everton including on the recruitment side of things. Their background while not identical are similar up until the point where they each get a sporting director job.

The point being that the issue with Murtough isn't his background or his experience, he simply happens to not be a good sporting director. It's not rare for people to deserve a chance in a different role but end up not being a good fit. We can be critical of Murtough without pretending that he didn't have experience in the field and also was competent in his roles.

I haven't done deep research on Ashworth yet but from the little I read about his role at WBA and Brighton he was basically a DOF there.

https://www.expressandstar.com/spor...-reveals-how-he-found-diamonds-for-west-brom/

https://www.ucfb.ac.uk/news/brighton-s-dan-ashworth-describes-role-of-technical-director/



Murtough at Everton. He was more of a development/academy guy

https://www.transfermarkt.com/john-murtough/profil/trainer/100862

Also the way he treated Butt and SAF is beyond hilarious and that's coming from someone who had criticized too much legends involvement in the club. To literally backstab Nicky Butt + not allowing SAF ample time to talk to Jude Bellingham is both stupid and counterproductive
 
Last edited:
This is always more damning. Getting a job beyond your station and growing into it is perfectly doable, that we have so many at the club who cannot shows doubly dire assessors who should be chopped too.
I'm not going to be that dickhead that says "I called this ages ago" but I am definitely a dickhead who called this ages ago.

Our entire structure is filled with people "learning on the job", who are expected to learn from other people learning on the job, overseen by people who have no experience to be able to tell the people learning on the job that they're learning the wrong things.
 
I'm not going to be that dickhead that says "I called this ages ago" but I am definitely a dickhead who called this ages ago.

Our entire structure is filled with people "learning on the job", who are expected to learn from other people learning on the job, overseen by people who have no experience to be able to tell the people learning on the job that they're learning the wrong things.
Yes, the chain is excessive; a few blaggers, OK, but if the chain has no ending, well... you get what we have.

You'd never have thought the club could be driven into the ground to this extent when all the descent first began, but by now, you're just wishing it'd stop so we can get started on our Shawshank Redemption arc.