Adam-Utd
Part of first caf team to complete Destiny raid
- Joined
- Sep 10, 2010
- Messages
- 39,954
They play as a 3 man midfield, Maddison plays as a LW that roams about.What about Tielemans?
They play as a 3 man midfield, Maddison plays as a LW that roams about.What about Tielemans?
I'm aware mate. Just wanted to see what response I got from the poster who I originally responded to.They play as a 3 man midfield, Maddison plays as a LW that roams about.
What about Tielemans?
Explain yourself…The game against Chelsea was turned around when Lingard was moved from the right to the center. That's why he started against Wolves. He is basically being put into an offensive position as a number 10 for his defensive skills of pace, technical ability, a strong engine and an ability to carry out the manager's game plan. Man Utd don't really have a lot in the way of alternatives to fill the role he plays. This need is exacerbated by the master plan of letting the team's best box to box midfielder, Herrera, leave for nothing. Lingard provides space and cover for Pogba to do his offense of thing.
The move for Lingard is similar to starting James. He may not be the finished product but James presents an offense of threat that cannot be ignored. He pulls the defense out to the right and make space for Rashford and Martial.
Clever bit of strategy by Ole and company.
He's not good enough as a squad player either, I don't know why people keep repeating this myth.
The biggist myth on the caf since a long time. His movement is most times pointless, check out the Wolves game for exampleI agree with him not being good enough but his use for Ole is undeniable as he is our best presser by far and is crucial to our ball retention. His movement also opens up space for others. That said his attacking output in terms of assists and goals is horrendous, he will need to be replaced among others. But like Ole said its a rebuild it will take time to complete.
One game where his movement is pointless doesn´t make a case. There are plenty of better games where his movement has, sadly that in it self isn´t enough to give him a place in the starting line up.The biggist myth on the caf since a long time. His movement is most times pointless, check out the Wolves game for example
He was poor against Wolves, so yes it was mostly pointless in that one. Other times his movement can be decent, and sometimes it's even very good.The biggist myth on the caf since a long time. His movement is most times pointless, check out the Wolves game for example
I agree with him not being good enough but his use for Ole is undeniable as he is our best presser by far and is crucial to our ball retention. His movement also opens up space for others. That said his attacking output in terms of assists and goals is horrendous, he will need to be replaced among others. But like Ole said its a rebuild it will take time to complete.
The biggist myth on the caf since a long time. His movement is most times pointless, check out the Wolves game for example
His movement is only effective against sides that doesn't park the bus, where we can catch them on a quick counter attack where he can run with the ball.
But against sides that park the bus and who's main concern is defending, he is pretty much a waste of space because he doesn't possess the passing range that's needed to break them open.
This appears to be lost on some people. His best games have generally come against stronger opposition who don't sit back and he can then exploit that space. He is absolutely useless in games against the likes of Burnley etc, as he doesn't really have the ability to unlock a defence when teams sit back to defend. Wolves looked to play on the counter the other night and he was absolutely terrible as he had no space to exploit.
It is an assumption based on 1000s of games gone before. If a team like wolves sits extremely deep and plays very negative and is well organised a player in the hole will see less of the ball and won't have space. It's actually basic if you just think it throughDon't think anyone think's of Pogba as a second striker. Just running isn't enough, yes he cannot press with the same intensity those 2 can but he can do a million other things that those 2 cannot.
That second part is nothing more than an assumption to justify your way of thinking, there's no telling what would've happened.
It is an assumption based on 1000s of games gone before. If a team like wolves sits extremely deep and plays very negative and is well organised a player in the hole will see less of the ball and won't have space. It's actually basic if you just think it through
He did a little dance and showed off his collection? Great movesThat’s fantastic, did he do anything in that run?
How did you come out with that conclusion i’m Not sure. Most number 10s that are actually good at playing football will try and get on the ball in order to create something, especially when the other team camps and has no desire to play. Our number 10 excels in athletics, so of course his footballing “abilities” come to surface.It is an assumption based on 1000s of games gone before. If a team like wolves sits extremely deep and plays very negative and is well organised a player in the hole will see less of the ball and won't have space. It's actually basic if you just think it through
How did you come out with that conclusion i’m Not sure. Most number 10s that are actually good at playing football will try and get on the ball in order to create something, especially when the other team camps and has no desire to play. Our number 10 excels in athletics, so of course his footballing “abilities” come to surface.
But what's the point of then dropping back next to the centre backs and midfielders?It is an assumption based on 1000s of games gone before. If a team like wolves sits extremely deep and plays very negative and is well organised a player in the hole will see less of the ball and won't have space. It's actually basic if you just think it through
Yes Thank you. I was laughing during the game. The last one is the best.This one?
Apparently he does a lot of hardwork most TV viewers don't see on their screens.The dude is not good enough, and wouldn't even start for wolves, Everton or even Leicester City. How then is he even a starter for Man Utd?
Apparently he does a lot of hardwork most TV viewers don't see on their screens.
So I'm missing frames with my 4K ?Tbf, you have to have an 8k tv with super ultra HD. When you get that, you’ll see what a gem Lingard is.
So I'm missing frames with my 4K ?
This one?
It seems longer Mason Greenwood is not playing in the 1st team the better he is becoming as a footballer.Greenwood buries that chance, unquestionably.
Greenwood buries that chance, unquestionably.
Greenwood buries that chance, unquestionably.
Yup, you’re missing him creating space like it’s an art
Upgrade the tv and you’ll see, he’s actually amazing!