Based Adnan
Full Member
- Joined
- Aug 4, 2014
- Messages
- 4,388
The way he runs is world class. No other player like him in the world. Be nice if he could do something with the ball though.
Has any journalist asked Ole why they are equal in assists and goals to Jesse Lingard in 2019? I’m really curious what the coaching staff think of his offensive contribution
I'm on the cheapest package, £10 a month, that includes all the data. I use it mainly for player stats like xG in the smaller leagues for work so I get everything I need with that package. You get about 20 minutes worth of video footage a month at that price as well.So you took premium account? Or is that free account.
I'm on the cheapest package, £10 a month, that includes all the data. I use it mainly for player stats like xG in the smaller leagues for work so I get everything I need with that package. You get about 20 minutes worth of video footage a month at that price as well.
That's from the last calendar year, you could say that Alexis Sanchez is more effective defensively than Lingard statistically, not sure if that means much though. Also ignore Dalot, he's just included because he's played on the wing a few times.
I could go back and check tackles, interception etc. I recorded the following: goals, assists, shots, shots OT, key passes, touches and passes. Would be like 4/5 hours work to go back through all the fixtures and throw in defensive stats. I'll probably get round to it eventually but need a break.
The reasons why we keep this player are the following (based on several coaches/managers descriptions and own viewing):
- He has many good (though not exellent) all round qualities, very few outright weaknesses
- He has good ball control, important when we play in tight spaces
- He is a good and consistent passer (look at his completed passes in a no 10 position) important to keep up ball retention which we already struggle with
- He is fairly quick (importent for our counters and for pressing)
- He has a good work rate (important for our pressing)
- He makes a lot of intelligent movement initiatives, important to open up play when we need to break down teams
- For an attacking player, he is good at covering defensive space
- He is good at understanding and following different game plans
- He has a very good work ethic in training (important to keep high standards at the training ground)
- He is very good at keeping a positive mentality in the dressing room/bus etc also when times are rough (very important to protect team morale in difficult patches)
He is a typical example of a player who exels in little, but allows a manager to field very talented specialists around him in spite of them lacking certain of these skills, which he will compensate for. Which is why manager after coach after manager continues to put him in their starting elevens while having more talented specialists on the bench.
Then there are reasons why many fans and some pundits think he is not good enough as a starter at Man United, reasons which are rifely described in this and many other threads here at the café. But that is a different question.
Just a few examples:
Lingard (Manchester United)
840 Premier League minutes in 2019.
7 Key Passes
0 Goals
0 Assists
Junior Stanislas (Bournemouth)
392 Premier League minutes in 2019.
7 Key Passes
0 Goals
1 Assist
Jonjo Shelvey (Newcastle)
379 Premier League minutes in 2019.
9 Key Passes
2 Goals
0 Assists
Dominic Solanke (Bournemouth)
363 Premier League minutes in 2019.
9 Key Passes
0 Goals
1 Assist
Callum Hudson-Odoi (Chelsea)
351 Premier League minutes in 2019.
9 Key Passes
0 Goals
1 Assist
Floyd Ayité (Fulham)
310 Premier League minutes in 2019.
9 Key Passes
1 Goal
0 Assists
Todd Cantwell (Norwich)
180 Premier League minutes in 2019.
8 Key Passes
0 Goals
2 Assists
Emiliano Buendía (Norwich)
180 Premier League minutes in 2019.
7 Key Passes
0 Goals
1 Assist
Jack Grealish (Aston Villa)
180 Premier League minutes in 2019.
8 Key Passes
0 Goals
1 Assist
Nathaniel Mendez-Laing (Cardiff City)
169 Premier League minutes in 2019.
7 Key Passes
2 Goals
1 Assist
He is very clever as he makes it looks as if he is always busy. A bit like Ed Woodward during the transfer window where he makes himself look as if he is busy trying to buy a lot of players. Just like Lingard who looks like he is always running or doing something important.
Time for him to get dropped. But for who exactly? The squad is thread fecking bare.
I am really do not understand why we keep this player. Played good in one game and then disappeared for 10-20 games. Just because he was grown up with from our youth team ?
The reasons why we keep this player are the following (based on several coaches/managers descriptions and own viewing):
- He has many good (though not exellent) all round qualities, very few outright weaknesses
- He has good ball control, important when we play in tight spaces
- He is a good and consistent passer (look at his completed passes in a no 10 position) important to keep up ball retention which we already struggle with
- He is fairly quick (importent for our counters and for pressing)
- He has a good work rate (important for our pressing)
- He makes a lot of intelligent movement initiatives, important to open up play when we need to break down teams
- For an attacking player, he is good at covering defensive space
- He is good at understanding and following different game plans
- He has a very good work ethic in training (important to keep high standards at the training ground)
- He is very good at keeping a positive mentality in the dressing room/bus etc also when times are rough (very important to protect team morale in difficult patches)
He is a typical example of a player who exels in little, but allows a manager to field very talented specialists around him in spite of them lacking certain of these skills, which he will compensate for. Which is why manager after coach after manager continues to put him in their starting elevens while having more talented specialists on the bench.
Then there are reasons why many fans and some pundits think he is not good enough as a starter at Man United, reasons which are rifely described in this and many other threads here at the café. But that is a different question.
Beautiful words mean nothing compare to his stats.
And this is the truth
I could go back and check tackles, interception etc. I recorded the following: goals, assists, shots, shots OT, key passes, touches and passes. Would be like 4/5 hours work to go back through all the fixtures and throw in defensive stats. I'll probably get round to it eventually but need a break.
I should have known you weren’t really interested in the answer to your question.
Most journalists seemed to think he played okay. Just United fans that I can see thought he was worst player on the pitch. Same most gamesNo, because he is very protected by the English media. Clowns like Luckhurst were even praising him after the other night. It's bizarre.
You may have your own views on him to answer me. But in the end stats speak louder. Not good enough and should not start next match.
If this is your football analysis of Lingards movement, I’m not impressed. The fact that you seem to believe that 20-30 different coaches at the Man United and England set up is being fooled by a player ‘making it look like he is busy’, makes me think you have been watching The Office for the wrong reasons.He is very clever as he makes it looks as if he is always busy. A bit like Ed Woodward during the transfer window where he makes himself look as if he is busy trying to buy a lot of players. Just like Lingard who looks like he is always running or doing something important.
Lingard should be scoring more goals, and should have a lot more assists.
Most journalists seemed to think he played okay. Just United fans that I can see thought he was worst player on the pitch. Same most games
Gomes works off the ball just as well IMO. It's not like Lingard ghosts into great attacking positions either, he just works hard and moves around a lot. But his movement isn't dangerous as he rarely gets into goal scoring positions.I think what people are wanting to see is a clear upgrade to Jesse Lingard in the first 11. Now it's true he does serve his purpose in the current first 11 due to his off the ball work, but is it enough to keep a superior talent out of the team (Gomes) at the expense of good off the ball work in a very advanced position in the first 11? I don't think so.
Gomes may not be as good as Lingard at pressing/closing down, but can he produce better output in a attacking sense to compensate? I think with the evidence at hand the answer is YES. Some may even counter me by saying he hasn't proved anything in the first 11 etc. But he can only show his worth if he's given a opportunity, and many like my self want to see that opportunity sooner rather than later. I'd much rather see us sacrifice some off the ball work with Lingard in favour of potentially a bigger boost to our playmaking capabilities with Gomes who is a mercurial talent and is outstanding technically.
With Palace up next at OT (who I assume will defend in numbers) it's a good opportunity to bring in the maestro Gomes who potentially has the craft and guile to make a real impact in a position we seem to struggle in due to the non playmaking qualities of Lingard.
Pathetic. That sub is a haven for top reds and the downvote/upvote system pushes differing opinions out of sight. Massive echo chamber. Happens all the time over there, one of our shit players be it Young or Jones or in this case Lingard will come under scrutiny and some self-righteous poster will make a long winded post about how they're actually great and everyone criticising them is a bad fan. Agendas all over the shop.
Literally found space in between the Wolves defensive and midfield line when giving it to Rashford and then makes a secondary run to find himself unmarked at the edge of the box during the goal. He was not nearly as bad as people are making out on here at all.