stevoc
Full Member
- Joined
- Jun 11, 2011
- Messages
- 22,694
Chuffed for him. Wouldn't be surprised if that was a tabloid rag figure and it is only around 3/4 of that figure. Well deserved! Go forth and bring goals our Warrington son.
Fixed
Chuffed for him. Wouldn't be surprised if that was a tabloid rag figure and it is only around 3/4 of that figure. Well deserved! Go forth and bring goals our Warrington son.
It's not though - if you look at my own club Spurs we work on the basis that if you perform on the pitch to a high standard we regularly will review your contract and improve the terms - gives players the motivation to improve as they know they will be rewarded for it. I'm not saying Lingard isn't a decent squad player - but £95,000 is a crazy, crazy amount to be paying a fringe player - Kane just crossed the £100,000 mark (at least I think he did) after several seasons of consistently strong performances.
It's not though - if you look at my own club Spurs we work on the basis that if you perform on the pitch to a high standard we regularly will review your contract and improve the terms - gives players the motivation to improve as they know they will be rewarded for it. I'm not saying Lingard isn't a decent squad player - but £95,000 is a crazy, crazy amount to be paying a fringe player - Kane just crossed the £100,000 mark (at least I think he did) after several seasons of consistently strong performances.
Young is one of the highest paid players in the team. Who's making a fuss?
The worst post of this thread.
That's how the fan boys were defending him previously, doesn't cost much and is a useful member of the squad. Now he's one of the highest paid , more than regular first teamers. And will be almost impossible to shift on those wages.
Worst post in the thread for the worst player in the squad.
It's the same people who say 'he is a good squad player' when he is pretty much a starter at this point.
I don't mind Lingard he's a useful player. But he just isn't a starter at this point, maybe in the future he could be if he improves. To be a starter you have to play the majority of games when you are fit.
Just what I was thinking. Did I miss something or is The Sun not as shit a source as ever?There's literally nothing to suggest he's signed for 95k a week other than Neil Custis at the fecking Sun.
And everyone is raging
It's not even factual at this point.
Just what I was thinking. Did I miss something or is The Sun not as shit a source as ever?
That would work out at £1million per non-crap performance. Just as well he's a £25k/week squad player.
Hopefully this is a WUM
The Sun remains at the very bottom of the Gutter Press to us rational individuals.
Some people who just don't like Lingard will look for any reason to spend time in this thread saying he's crap. It's remarkable really.
That's how the fan boys were defending him previously, doesn't cost much and is a useful member of the squad. Now he's one of the highest paid , more than regular first teamers. And will be almost impossible to shift on those wages.
Worst post in the thread for the worst player in the squad.
If he was on £5 a week it would be too much
Exactly, let's wait for some more reports.How gullible are some of the fans here that they actually believe report from The Sun who ran an exclusive earlier as well stating we have reached an agreement with Lingard for his contract renewal with new wages agreed as £50000 per week.
We may very well be negotiating with Lingard for his contract renewal and even after factoring in our reputation as generous pay master I don't think we would be offering anywhere close to £95000 a week to a player who would be hard pressed to get a contract worth even £50000 a week outside of United.
He starts alot of games, More than the bog standard squad player. Plus he has started over the likes of Martial, Mkhi, Rashford and Mata on a number of occasions this season which indicates to me that he is considered a starter by Jose, as much as I don't rate him for that.
Do you feel better now?
Maybe 95k seems high (although market rates for wages are rising rapidly across the board) but 25k is certainly way too low for the player of his calibre. I would have thought that even posters with an agenda against him would agree to that.
Also there is no indication that the club is thinking of shifting him but looks like they are keen on retaining him.
When he's no longer near the team I will
Really? That's a very generous comparison imo. Both in style and quality, I find Lingard a long way from Lallana's level.
Yeah I was being a bit diplomatic in terms of quality I'll admit. But I think they're pretty similar in terms of their all-round game and their attributes; pace, movement, link up play, work rate, control. Lallana definitely has more edge to him. That's about the level I could see Lingard reaching eventually though, which isn't bad. Not great, but not bad either.
The worst player in the squad who won us our last two pieces of silverware? Fellaini must be amazing, Schweinsteiger, Darmian and Memphis too.Lingard is the worst player in the squad and gets £95k. We deserve failure!
The worst player in the squad who won us our last two pieces of silverware? Fellaini must be amazing, Schweinsteiger, Darmian and Memphis too.
Lingard is the worst player in the squad and gets £95k. We deserve failure!
Lallana is a much, much more talented player than Lingard tbh.
The worst player in the squad who won us our last two pieces of silverware? Fellaini must be amazing, Schweinsteiger, Darmian and Memphis too.