The relation is that it was very one sided and some of the things said about Pakistanis (and the obvious religious aspects) were quite bad and most people in that thread didnt seem to have a problem with it. So I dont think "imagine if this was peddled about any other minority" really holds water.
It was a “debate” primarily between Indian and Pakistani members on here which I guess most of the rest of the Cafe lost interest in fairly quickly. And it got closed, the correct call, and not for the first time.
Second, I think that in light of the long history of anti-Semitism a lot of people have lost all nuance when discussing it. Things that arent antisemitic (like what Ilhan Omar said) are called anti semitic and the backlash is so severe that everyone piles on. So for people interested in deflecting criticism of their actions, calling their opponents anti semitic is very effective.
There is also the tactic, seen repeatedly on the Cafe, of implying that something cannot be antisemitic since it is just criticism of Israel. E.g. referring to Israel as a “disease”.
I think theres no doubt that israel and a number of mainstream Zionist organizations engage in propaganda and seek to control parts of the media. I also think the US does it and Russia does it and Amazon does it and the NFL does it and so on. But because of the long standing accusation of Jewish controlling the media, any time someone tries to point out that Israel and its allies engage in it, people fall over each other to condemn the (in some cases, true) accusation.
There is a very good discussion to be had about the influence of lobbies, etc. As long as everything is contextualised and honestly laid out, there is no problem in recognizing that Israel boasts a very strong and successful PR machine in parts of the West.
Every country attempts to manipulate and influence through supporters. For a variety of understandable reasons - historical, cultural, economic, strategic, etc. - some are more successful than others. The Irish lobby in DC was powerful enough that America turned a blind eye to funding for the (Irish) Republican cause throughout the Troubles, despite the “special relationship” with the UK. Consider the number of Irish-Americans associated with the Trump admin, and imagine the response if, say, Trump intervened somehow on behalf of Ireland in the current Brexit quagmire (something that has been mooted in the press) - would we hear about the nefarious control of the Irish lobby and Irish state on US policy in the vital region? The Irish operation to control US media? Would Irish-American supporters of the Irish lobby be accused of dual loyalty (Ilhan Omar’s topic of today)?
Why do you think we hear about these things almost exclusively in relation to Israel (I’ll grant that Russia-hysteria is currently probably worse)? The fact is that Israel and its supporters are regularly, disproportionately subjected to ‘critiques’ which just happen to reflect stonecold antisemitic tropes, and often from a section of the left which is extremely sensitive to analogous discourse aimed at other minorities.
You can roll out MacPherson principle all you want but it doesn’t make them correct.
I’ve not mentioned it. 86% don’t necessarily have to be correct, but they do need to be listened to, taken seriously and not dismissed as “lying to themselves” out of some kind of tribal solidarity.