Didn't you sign him for €80m? You won't make a profit.
James Rodriguez | joins Bayern Munich | 2 year loan
- Thread starter GM K
- Start date
- Status
Didn't you sign him for €80m? You won't make a profit.
Cheers. Last minute edit before you quoted me.
....already explained this. Look it up if you want, or don't. We'll make a profit so long as we sell for more than €45M
I doubt we are interested as he is not a player for a Mourinho side. Real are just using our name and this 'James only wants United' BS to drive up his price.
It will be more or less like Morata's case itself.
Why should ideally expect any profit. The player was bought on a inflated price itself, failed to lived up to the potential and hype and is a bench warmer.This should be a loss deal, expecting any profit is unrealistic.
He didn't fail to live up to his potential. He did very well his first two years. After that he wasn't the shiny new toy anymore. So he was cast aside.
I am sorry but did he live up to his overinflated 80m euro potential?
Are we? Fellaini was playing there in the EL final.
Player potential is different from what a team pays for him.
Completely absurd statement.
Yeah, i agree. Second choice reserve back up striker would probably be much fairer.
Seriously though, I find it harsh to consider James as a reject when he's more of a misfit really, he just doesn't fit into Zidane's preferred system. Which it has to be said, isn't doing too badly so far....! Yet I still think James has had pretty good impact when he has had the chance, so i don't think any less of him as a player for failing to break into this system, and i still rate him very highly myself. I would still consider buying him for a wide role here even though he can't get into yours, because to be fair your back up strike force of Isco, Morata and James would easily be most teams first choice forward line. So I think he could be a better choice for us on either flank, regularly offering better quality delivery and more goals than any of Martial, Mata, Mki or Lingard. You see more of him than i do, objectively speaking, would you agree?
Don't think so. Morata is a player we'd rather keep, because he's an important player for us and replacing him would be difficult. James is a luxury fringe player, we already "replaced" him thanks to Isco and Asensio. We're actually interested in selling him, or at least we should be
Because he's still very much a world class player and a difference maker in the right team, and selling for a loss would be stupid. He's not on stupid wages, and even with all the new contracts and the signings of Vinicius, Ceballos and Theo, we shouldn't have any problem financially, at least for this season. Next season he'll be worth like €30M, we should be able to at least break even
That was due to our plan to hoof it and bypass their press. We will probably play a 433 most of the time anyway
He was never an 80 million euro player in the first place. We took a 20 million loss on Di Maria Madrid should take a 40 million loss on James.
I still don't get how a transfer fee can be compared to player potential? It's not like he is a shit player. He still performed well.
You took no loss on Di Maria
Fair point.
10m
James is just one of those signings that always reeks of a scattergun approach. I'm not even sure if thats in my mind but thats exactly what I think people would think once added with Lukaku...
He's going with the angle that we paid off his wages for 1 year and basically sold him at the fee that amounted to his remaining wages.
PSG will be the only club willing to buy him because their owners want any big name they can get.
Signed for €75M, 5 year deal, sold for €60M after a year. Break even. Unless it's different in pounds?
I wouldn't mind James for a decent price despite my reservations with his attitude.
I surely wouldn't purchase him at the price that gives Real Madrid a profit.
I surely wouldn't purchase him at the price that gives Real Madrid a profit.
Yes, which is how it works. Financially, the club did not lose money on Di Maria
Thats a weird way to look at it
No, that's how it works for the clubs
Well we enjoyed his "services" for 1 year. So the wages paid to him were of benefit so to speak for the club. Then the remaining wages were covered through the fee itself, so we broke even.
It is how clubs look at it imo, but I get why people would say we lost money over the deal.
Then we can go and pay Real what james has left in wages for them to not take a loss, but it wont work
I agree, not to mention the player is a year older. Plus a bit of the shine was taken off his perceived worth, due to his season with us showing his frail mentality.
This has no logic at all
Yes we are, mkh lingard Mata pogba can all play there , and so will a second striker if bought.
Yeah then we should sell jese lingard for 60m . Shall we?
Amazing how Madrid fans justify these fees yet spent all summer crying about Pogba and 89 fecking million.
and Smalling can play as CF while Lukaku can be the GK!
Any player can 'play' in any position but what really matters is how well they perform in said positions, and, playing as a #10, James is better than all the players you listed.
Even Everton can afford 45 m euros. If a club of the Calibre he wants to join comes in Madrid will ask for 70 m euros and won't close any deal less than that or around.
75m for James? It's quite clear that Madrid don't want to sell players. Clubs need to stop trying to buy players from them. It's a waste of time really. Work with clubs that are going to be serious about selling. I hope we're not going to waste time on this, let PSG knock themselves out.
Well there is no proof of that when he failed to live up the hype and expectations in Madrid with that same incredible high price tag that's why Madrid is selling him in the first place without increasing his wages which the player can earn more in a different country which is why the player wants to leave in the first place.
What level of potential he has or does not have, is decided not by selling party but buying party on how much can he adapt and perform in a new league and new environment and how much of a difference he can actually make in their team compared to competition around. Even next season ideally he will be quoted the same price or little less than 60 m.
No they want to sell to fund a new toy, and expect the clubs to pay the valuation because of the financial strengths of the respective buyers by wrapping a new packing paper of potential around it.
Can all play there but only Mkhitaryan has played there for a decent amount of his games.
All those players bar Pogba can play on the wing, as well as Rashford and Martial. Maybe we shouldn't buy a winger then.
And yet madrd should expect to buy a keeper of the level of de Gea for 29 m and 50 m with a new contract?
Contradictory , isn't it?
- Status