cheeky_backheel
Full Member
- Joined
- Apr 7, 2017
- Messages
- 2,529
The entire chelsea team failed in the last season and not just Matic. Your statement is disingenuous and tries to paint it like Matic was the problem.Fabinho is not a matic , he can not do that job alone, and besides matic failed tremendously in his second season. Also A 4231 will never get the best out of martial , you except to bench him too and sell him later because he is a flop as well?
We have to develop a system which suits every players strengths, and not just shoe horn players in a 4231.
Also be flexible and fluid in our systems so that we can play different systems, a 4231 is very predictable and frankly speaking outdated and against our history.
Rashford should not be shoehorned on the wing also.
Fabinho is good enough to be better than a Matic imo. He has only started playing in midfield this season and I expect will get better with time. Still I would leave that judgment to Mourinho.
Rashford, at his current level, is best used as a LWF. He is not at the level to play upfront alone. We will almost certainly be getting a new CF this summer. With a new CF+Rashford at LWF, the team can transition to 2 CF formation (e.g. 4-4-2) on the field without a sub
Martial has shown nothing this season to put him in the starting lineup ahead of anybody else, talk less of selecting a formation to accommodate him. He will start on the bench next season, and depending on how it goes, might end up being sold. Its unfortunate but flops happen. If he improves, he has a shot at the CF or LWF positions.
If you buy players to suit a system, then you will have a system that suits the players. this is exactly what Mourinho does. Its is a different problem at a smaller club when you cant always buy the type of player you want. In such cases the manager has to be more flexible.
Every team has a base formation but that does not bar them from changing formation within the game. Depending on the players you have on the field, you can adapt your strategy and tactics accordingly. 4-2-3-1, along with 4-3-3, is one of the best formations in the modern game, as shown by its wide spread use. 4-4-2 is less popular while the 3-4-3 and 3-5-2 are seeing a resurgence under italian influence. You cannot say a formation is outdated and in the next phrase make reference to club history. Sticking with club history is what will leave you with an outdated formation.