James McCarthy

Status
Not open for further replies.
If he was that good he would be playing in top side already, not Everton, also he would not be relegated. It's really hard to remember a top player that was relegated at 22.
Roy Keane?
 
Illa was €38m and has barely been used by Real, Song also hasn't really been anything more than a decent squad player for Barca.

Anyway, I'd take McCarthy here, good player and we'd actually use him!
Without doubt he'd be relatively successful here and an improvement on our current midfield options, Herrera aside.

We're too snobby, people didn't want Cabaye last year... This is how you build a strong squad à la Bayern and Madrid, you take players like Fellaini and Anderson and replace them with players like McCarthy.
 
Without doubt he'd be relatively successful here and an improvement on our current midfield options, Herrera aside.

We're too snobby, people didn't want Cabaye last year... This is how you build a strong squad à la Bayern and Madrid, you take players like Fellaini and Anderson and replace them with players like McCarthy.
I wanted Cabaye :(

Hell, I'd take Schneiderlin if he's going.
 
He wouldn't get his game at Chelsea, City or Arsenal right now, so no. As for us, well our transfer dealings were an absolute joke last year so we don't count. For all we know there were other clubs interested in him, McCarthy enjoys a strong relationship with Martinez.
He'd definitely play beside Ramsey for Arsenal, as he's better than Arteta and Flamini.
 
He'd definitely play beside Ramsey for Arsenal, as he's better than Arteta and Flamini.
Like I said for all we know Arsenal were interested last year, McCarthy has a loyalty to Martinez and probably felt Everton was the best next step for him. He's a level headed kid.
 

Why's McCarthy been cut as short as 1/3? Have there been some reports that I've missed or something?

I've seen that he said he was flattered but that was a few days ago now and nothing big.
 
Like feck would we sell our best player of the season after signing Lukaku and Barkley on long term deals.
 
I love McCarthy, and was a frequent contributor to his previous (i.e. not transfer forum) thread, but this is pure bullshit.

Hes in the level below the top midfielders. Same as Herrera in my view.
Which probably means he won't be at Everton for long.

People said the same about Barkley and Lukaku.
 
People said the same about Barkley and Lukaku.

Steady on. You've only had Barkley (first proper season), Lukaku and McCarthy for one consistent season, and there's already been teams sniffing around. Another season like last season from all three, and I doubt you'll be able to keep them.

That said, I don't rate Lukaku that much, and if there were any top teams after him this Summer, there's no way you would have signed him, in my opinion.
 
Considering what Everton just spent on Lukaku, I'd wager he'd cost us a pretty penny now anyway.

Another one to add to the long list of midfielders we've not bothered to attempt to sign when they were available.
 
Hes in the level below the top midfielders. Same as Herrera in my view.

He's doing very well for himself but he still has a lot to learn. Before last season began, I'd have placed McCarthy and Cleverley on a par (maybe Cleverley slightly ahead); one good season in the Premier League with Everton does not mean he's not just below the elite midfielders, however.

As for Herrera, he's ahead of McCarthy already and will continue to prove that. I hate the word "ceiling" but I believe that Herrera possesses more potential than McCarthy, not to mention the fact that McCarthy is quite one-dimensional in contrast to the number of roles Herrera can fulfil.

People said the same about Barkley and Lukaku.

Ronaldo signed a new contract at United merely months before he left United. Christ, Thiago Silva signed a new contract merely weeks before he left Milan. Contracts means feck all in the modern game. If the selling club is presented with an incredible amount of money, that player is being sold, regardless of the noises being made.
 
Considering what Everton just spent on Lukaku, I'd wager he'd cost us a pretty penny now anyway.

Another one to add to the long list of midfielders we've not bothered to attempt to sign when they were available.

Even the ones who have gone on to do not very much...Dembele....Wanyama...I'd still take over some of our options which says it all!
 
Much better player than Cleverley. Do a swap and throw in a-few quid; Martinez likes Cleverley and McCarthy would be a very good player for us.
 
And if Herrera was good enough to play for Barca or Madrid you wouldn't have got him.

And it's not a shame to be not considered good enough to play for that Barca midfield. Heck, they got shot of Thaigo and Fabregas 'cause they thought they were not good enough. Regarding Madrid, they play someone like Khedira alongside Modric and Alonso. And I rate Herrera above Khedira so not playing for Madrid is more because he was not the flavor of the season for Bilbao else he would have been targeted by Madrid. Look at Isco. Was sublime for Malaga and barely gets a look in at Madrid.
 
What? We can't buy every central midfielder in the world, FFS!
Wait, are you serious here?

Fellaini was the first midfielder we've bought in since 2007 (well, Powell excluded). There's a difference between buying them all and buying none.
 
We bought none for about 7 years. Probably a world record time to elapse if you look at Real, Bayern or Barca over the past 50 years!

Barca have not had the best of times with CBs. So every team has their own Achilles heal.
 
Wait, are you serious here?

Fellaini was the first midfielder we've bought in since 2007 (well, Powell excluded). There's a difference between buying them all and buying none.

And that is very debatable. He's more of a number 10 than CM if you ask me but feck knows what that toilet brush's best position is.
 
Good player and would make an ok signing(Can't see it happening).But as soon as Carrick's back then I would image it would Herrera and Carrick being are main midfielder's,we've already got Cleverley who I think not as good as Mccarthy but the difference is pretty minimal. So we would be buying a really decent back up which isn't really a problem but it's not a great solution either.

Also if you look at the potential we've got in the youth team with the Rothwell,Pearson who have got great potential and then LVG record of starting youth players then signing Mccarthy would only really be useful for this coming season.
 
And it's not a shame to be not considered good enough to play for that Barca midfield. Heck, they got shot of Thaigo and Fabregas 'cause they thought they were not good enough. Regarding Madrid, they play someone like Khedira alongside Modric and Alonso. And I rate Herrera above Khedira so not playing for Madrid is more because he was not the flavor of the season for Bilbao else he would have been targeted by Madrid. Look at Isco. Was sublime for Malaga and barely gets a look in at Madrid.
Maybe thats for a reason ? Or maybe because like McCarthy people actually don't watch how he plays and instead look at the teams he plays for and automatically dismiss him as not good enough. The point about Lukaku signing because no one else wanted him could be applied no near enough every transfer otherwise United would never sign a player who wasn't English as 99% of foreign players would choose Barca, Madrid and Munich first.
 
Good player and would make an ok signing(Can't see it happening).But as soon as Carrick's back then I would image it would Herrera and Carrick being are main midfielder's,we've already got Cleverley who I think not as good as Mccarthy but the difference is pretty minimal. So we would be buying a really decent back up which isn't really a problem but it's not a great solution either.

Also if you look at the potential we've got in the youth team with the Rothwell,Pearson who have got great potential and then LVG record of starting youth players then signing Mccarthy would only really be useful for this coming season.

I would argue that there's currently a very minimal difference between McCarthy/Carrick rather than McCarthy/Cleverley. McCarthy was certainly better than Carrick last season and, though Carrick may indeed prove to be better this season, it won't be long before McCarthy has firmly overtaken him given their ages and the fact that McCarthy simply has a higher celing IMO. As for Cleverley, he's far behind McCarthy atm.
 
How can United fans not see how soft and easy to play through their midfield is ? McCarthy would transform the team with the way he plays the game. He doesn't give the opposition an inch. Do you all want another sexy attack minded midfielder to partner Herrera and Mata ? It seems a lot of people want this to be the case.
 
I would argue that there's currently a very minimal difference between McCarthy/Carrick rather than McCarthy/Cleverley. McCarthy was certainly better than Carrick last season and, though Carrick may indeed prove to be better this season, it won't be long before McCarthy has firmly overtaken him given their ages and the fact that McCarthy simply has a higher celing IMO. As for Cleverley, he's far behind McCarthy atm.

I'm counting last season as a right off. This could easily turn into a Carrick debate but I don't McCarthy has anywhere near the level of skills to control games(which isn't a dig but most players don't) the Carrick can. Also Carrick's proved he's very good proving both the attacking and defence roles in midfield.

McCarthy got plenty of time to reach a high level but I do think to reach Carrick's level would take something special.

Also just to add I would Carrick in the 2nd tier in great midfielder's,1st tier players like Scholes Xavi,Keane Pirlo
 
McCarthy was certainly better than Carrick last season and, though Carrick may indeed prove to be better this season, it won't be long before McCarthy has firmly overtaken him given their ages and the fact that McCarthy simply has a higher celing IMO.

This statement is like something from Looney Toons. Utterly, utterly bizarre.

McCarthy will not have anywhere near the career that Michael Carrick will have had when both are retired. Both in terms of footballing ability and honours won. Codswallop to suggest otherwise.

Last season I heralded McCarthy as Carrick's natural heir (and I believe that he's as close to Carrick as I've seen in England at that age) but I don't believe his "ceiling" is higher. Not at all.
 
I'm counting last season as a right off. This could easily turn into a Carrick debate but I don't McCarthy has anywhere near the level of skills to control games(which isn't a dig but most players don't) the Carrick can. Also Carrick's proved he's very good proving both the attacking and defence roles in midfield.

McCarthy got plenty of time to reach a high level but I do think to reach Carrick's level would take something special.

Also just to add I would Carrick in the 2nd tier in great midfielder's,1st tier players like Scholes Xavi,Keane Pirlo

I'd say Carrick was in the third tier....
 
Status
Not open for further replies.