AKDevil
Full Member
Yes it does, English clubs will pay more for a top English talent.
And they’ll have to because selling clubs know they are needed for quotas.
Yes it does, English clubs will pay more for a top English talent.
Yes.Is that legit?
The Sun saying today that he'll snub a move to us to 'complete his 3 year plan' at Dortmund. Not sure how reliable they are with Sancho but I hope they're wrong.
The Sun saying today that he'll snub a move to us to 'complete his 3 year plan' at Dortmund. Not sure how reliable they are with Sancho but I hope they're wrong.
He's known to be good friends with Rashford and Gomes.Is that legit?
He means which reporter, there is plenty at sun football. Some with agendas.The Sun...
Is that legit?
I think his development would benefit from another year, I just don't think we have the luxury of leaving him now and not making a move, we need to act fast.
Yes.
He's known to be good friends with Rashford and Gomes.
He means which reporter, there is plenty at sun football. Some with agendas.
Yes it is. He posted two Instagram stories. One with the Rashford comment and another video of him repeating 'I have no words.'
It's essentially like buying Rooney for 30m 15 years ago. That deal turned out pretty well for us didnt it??The alleged figures being quoted for this lad are ridiculous. Good player but I want more than potential for that money if it's true.....
It's essentially like buying Rooney for 30m 15 years ago. That deal turned out pretty well for us didnt it??
I agree. But it seems unrealistic to expect a move for a substantial lesser fee. It just does. He is going to play for United next season though.How? He was England's best player and one of the best players at the Euros at Euro 2004, aged 18 and allowing him to be the youngest goalscorer in the history of the European Championships at that time.
Sancho still has a ways to go to prove himself on the big occasion. And £30 million in 2004 wasn't as rare a transfer fee as £100 million in 2019. So clearly they are not the same.
I agree. But it seems unrealistic to expect a move for a substantial lesser fee. It just does. He is going to play for United next season though.
Ole is at the wheel, you need to have your dreaming glasses on mate. More realistic that wayVery much doubt it. I think he'll stay at Dortmund and not be quite as good and will move after another season or more
How? He was England's best player and one of the best players at the Euros at Euro 2004, aged 18 and allowing him to be the youngest goalscorer in the history of the European Championships at that time.
Sancho still has a ways to go to prove himself on the big occasion. And £30 million in 2004 wasn't as rare a transfer fee as £100 million in 2019. So clearly they are not the same.
Anyone saw this?
It reads:
Jadon Sancho is PSG's target for the next transfer. Thomas Tuchel, ex-coach of Borussia Dortmund called him. Although he hesitates with Manchester United, the elimination of the English club tomorrow should make him decide for the Parisian side.
I suppose he can safely come to United now.
Will he cost as much as Mbappe? no.There have been just 7 transfers in the last decade above Ronaldo's £80 million move which became the record at the time.
7 in 10 years.
Yes the top 6 have all been in the past 3 years, but that doesn't mean every youngster who has a really good season is now a £100 million player.
Thats only on Football Manager.
Of those 6, only MBappe was signed with near just 1 season proving himself. He had 51 appearances in France, Europa League and Champions League.
So Sancho, unless he matches those appearances signing for a club for a top 10 fee would actually be something unprecedented.
He's at 43 appearances so far. And can make 53 if he plays in every game till the end of the season.
Then you ask, is he as good as MBappe?
I'd say no.
Will he cost as much as Mbappe? no.
You seem determined to push your valuation of Sancho. Just because Sancho is valued at that doesn't mean every youngster will cost 100m.
Sancho is one of the few teenagers who could command that fee, you seem determined to lower his status from among the elite young talents to throw him in with other, nameless strawman kids to prove a point.
There will be a bidding war for Sancho for a reason. He'll become more of the mean for the outrageous young talents than once in a gerneration Mbappe will. I mean, you say 7 100m transfers in ten years like its a rare occurrence and even then its a disingenuous stat as 6 (?)of those have happened within the last two summer transfer windows which shows the radical change in the market which goes against the point youre trying to make.
Thats not including the many transfers that have happened that's just 15-20m short of that figure.
Saying that, it's 100m euros right?
Only if you ignore how good he's been and how talented he is.Hes having a good season, happens just about every year that a youngster has a good season. So if Sancho will be bought for that, so will next season's Sancho and so on
They sold a player who is not as rated as Sancho for £60m. He even had an expiring contract as well.There have been just 7 transfers in the last decade above Ronaldo's £80 million move which became the record at the time.
7 in 10 years.
Yes the top 6 have all been in the past 3 years, but that doesn't mean every youngster who has a really good season is now a £100 million player.
Thats only on Football Manager.
Of those 6, only MBappe was signed with near just 1 season proving himself. He had 51 appearances in France, Europa League and Champions League.
So Sancho, unless he matches those appearances signing for a club for a top 10 fee would actually be something unprecedented.
He's at 43 appearances so far. And can make 53 if he plays in every game till the end of the season.
Then you ask, is he as good as MBappe?
I'd say no.
May have been a bit of desperation on Chelsea's behalf though with the transfer ban looming.They sold a player who is not as rated as Sancho for £60m. He even had an expiring contract as well.
I think people seem to forget just how fantastic Rooney was as a teenager. He was a bargain.
Nobody's quoting a £165m transfer fee for Sancho. You're answering a question that nobody's asked.There have been just 7 transfers in the last decade above Ronaldo's £80 million move which became the record at the time.
7 in 10 years.
Yes the top 6 have all been in the past 3 years, but that doesn't mean every youngster who has a really good season is now a £100 million player.
Thats only on Football Manager.
Of those 6, only MBappe was signed with near just 1 season proving himself. He had 51 appearances in France, Europa League and Champions League.
So Sancho, unless he matches those appearances signing for a club for a top 10 fee would actually be something unprecedented.
He's at 43 appearances so far. And can make 53 if he plays in every game till the end of the season.
Then you ask, is he as good as MBappe?
I'd say no.
We're talking about the same really good player that you yourself said City have let go. Or rather, they only let him go because Sancho wanted out. I'm all for buying talented young players........I'm sure people wanting to spend 100m is based on watching him play or is it more about the hype? I get it and it's not my money but I'm fed up with us spending these massive amounts on shiny things cause we have the money when I think we have potential in the club and we need to look in other English clubs too. Chelsea and city have let some really good players go elsewhere over the years and arguably although it's a few years ago, Pogba proved a costly mistake. The thing I like about Ole is it's clear he's gonna give our young players a chance.
We're talking about the same really good player that you yourself said City have let go. Or rather, they only let him go because Sancho wanted out.
You can't assume that we have talent on the same level as Sancho or we will find talent on his level. Potentially we have Greenwood, but many of us see him as a striker in the future even though he can play as a wide player. Sancho was the 2000 born English group's biggest talent. Signing Sancho will probably affect Chong, but Chong should not be prioritized over Sancho. Not nearly as skilled, is older, and isn't close to performing to the level of Sancho despite the huge difference in their respective competition's levels.Royal we? No denying the potential but 100m, no chance. You might be right he wanted out as Pogba wanted out too, both because they didn't get the chance. All I'm saying is let's not make the same mistake whilst chasing others, forgetting how that hinders our own players development. Lindelof and Dalot have also shown we don't always have to spend big with the right scouting. Funny how the German teams seem to be recognise young potential better than we are currently are and importantly given them first team opportunities....