What do you call someone who calls someone he doesn’t know ‘a crock’ for thinking social media handling can affect performance? If it’s ok to lable someone based on that, would ‘idiot’ suffice? Perhaps hyperbole would be required to? ‘Braindead a..ehole’ would perhaps be a descriptive hyperbole for someone who labeled another as damaged because he showed signs of normal human functioning? But if one were to call such a person ‘braindead a..ehole’, might someone then say that this would be inacceptable, that two wrongs don’t make a right or similar, or that one should be more lighthearted about the original name calling? Yet, the same person might also say, the light heartedness should be applied to both statements, or if the first speaker found displeasure in being labled a ‘braindead a..ehole’, he should first find displeasure in himself for labeling another a ‘crock’ without sufficient knowledge. How to procede from such a situation?