Jadon Sancho | £72.9M fee agreed

Status
Not open for further replies.
And he could have played against Leipzig instead of Rashford and then Rashford would not have scored a treble!!
Feck me......I think this must be a fortune tellers forum
If signing better players, becoming a better team and creating better squad depth isn't going to give us better results on the field, what is the point of signing those players? Our CL experience this season is one of the clearer examples of where a new signing that clearly upgrades our team likely (not definitely, but likely) would have made a difference.
 
Several points come to mind.

We spent at least 65m on three players who made zero impact, two of whom play in Sancho’s favored position at RW.

If we’re going to save only 20m over what was demanded last year, it seems in retrospect that it would have been well worth it to spend that 20m on him than on the 65m on three players who made zero contribution.

At the very least it can’t be denied we actually had the funds to pull this off last season. But it may well be the case that the Glazers felt they needed to send a message that they will not be held hostage to a purported ransom demand.


I kinda agree with what you are saying, but the problem is 2 folds, last year, BVB wanted 120M euros as base fee, and add-ons that would take the total fee to the same fee they got from Barcelona for Dembele, around 150-160M euros, they weren't open to negotiate it and i don't think the club had such funds available at all, what was available was probably around 120M pounds after spending 35M pounds on DvB, the other part of the problem was United's mistake for not understanding BVB true intentions, had the club understood what BVB wanted early, they would have moved on early and probably be able to pursue good players.

because of how they handled their attempt to sign Sancho last season, they went on Panic Mode at the last 48 hours of the window, and brought in a backup LB (Telles)& ST (Cavani) who went straight to the 1st team as squad options, and 2 young prospects in Amad & Pellistri, who went to the reserves first, because as i mentioned earlier, they are young prospects and were brought in for the future as both are actually teenagers (18/19 years old), and their signing should have no bearing on building the current squad and bringing in players who are ready for the 1st team games.
 
I created the previous thread on the player that grew exponentially over the years. And the same people who are now saying we should've signed him earlier, (by paying the exorbitant sum Dortmund reportedly wanted) were saying we didn't have a chance to sign him and were wasting our time. I was probably among a small minority who called this transfer to us and was told by some that I was deluded to think Sancho would choose us. It's hilarious to now see the changing narrative.

The club did right not to pay the ridiculous price Dortmund wanted a year earlier. It high time we stopped setting a precedent for other clubs to dictate terms to us.

100%, if reports are to be believed, they wanted 120M euros as base fee!! with add-ons that will make the total fee be close to what Barca paid for Dembele.

Now, we are getting him for 95M euros as total fee, that's significantly less than what they wanted last year.
 
Several points come to mind.

We spent at least 65m on three players who made zero impact, two of whom play in Sancho’s favored position at RW.

If we’re going to save only 20m over what was demanded last year, it seems in retrospect that it would have been well worth it to spend that 20m on him than on the 65m on three players who made zero contribution.

At the very least it can’t be denied we actually had the funds to pull this off last season. But it may well be the case that the Glazers felt they needed to send a message that they will not be held hostage to a purported ransom demand.

You do understand that there's a bit of a difference between paying the vast majority of a transfer fee up front and paying it yearly installments?
 
Several points come to mind.

We spent at least 65m on three players who made zero impact, two of whom play in Sancho’s favored position at RW.

If we’re going to save only 20m over what was demanded last year, it seems in retrospect that it would have been well worth it to spend that 20m on him than on the 65m on three players who made zero contribution.

At the very least it can’t be denied we actually had the funds to pull this off last season. But it may well be the case that the Glazers felt they needed to send a message that they will not be held hostage to a purported ransom demand.

Appears we’re saving a fair whack more than 20m.

What we are getting now is a player at that represents good value. The players we bought last season were also at prices that represented good value.
So what we’re about to have is 4 players that represent good value rather than one player on a massive rip off.
Sometimes it’s simply better to wait, without Sancho we still improved every aspect of our season from the previous.
 
100%, if reports are to be believed, they wanted 120M euros as base fee!! with add-ons that will make the total fee be close to what Barca paid for Dembele.

Now, we are getting him for 95M euros as total fee, that's significantly less than what they wanted last year.

Tbf that's due to him having one less year on his contact rather than us being good negotiators.

When you take that into consideration it's not much different. 95m Euros for a player with two years on his deal, wants out and can't really get into an England team that isn't all that is incredible business by Dortmund. We are the only club in the world who'd pay that for him and it seems we are.
 
Tbf that's due to him having one less year on his contact rather than us being good negotiators.

When you take that into consideration it's not much different. 95m Euros for a player with two years on his deal, wants out and can't really get into an England team that isn't all that is incredible business by Dortmund. We are the only club in the world who'd pay that for him and it seems we are.

You are wrong on the bolded, Barca paid 150M for Dembele and he didn't do much, Atletico paid 120M for Felix, he didn't much as well, plenty of clubs pay huge fees for players, not only us.
 
Sorry, just read this.

I’d say Amad is in the same bracket simply because we paid over £20m for him with no experience. That isn’t even close to being normal. In fact, I’d say it is testimony of us ranking him in a similar category as any of the players mentioned.

Ultimately, I’m not against us having another winger. As I’ve been reminded a lot, City have a number of players. The difference is that those players are all established. Greenwood, Sancho and Amad will not simply be competing to play, they will be competing for the right to even develop. All players are in the developmental stage and need games to grow, City can only have one Foden IMO, 3 Foden’s in competition doesn’t make sense. So in a sense, if we were about to sign Son, for example, I think it would be different.

I don’t think you buy a player for £20-40m who has just turned 17 and played half an hour’s football without a clear plan to develop them or clear belief that you are talking of a player you back to become world class. Diallo is not the same as Chong.

Yeah, they should still get plenty of games, we have 4 attacking positions. All of them can play multiple positions too. We have Rashford, Sancho, Greenwood as wingers. Greenwood wants to play as CF in the future. So it's just 2 players, not counting James as good chance he won't be here for long time. Also player who is such a huge talent shouldn't really worry about players like James.
 
Tbf that's due to him having one less year on his contact rather than us being good negotiators.

When you take that into consideration it's not much different. 95m Euros for a player with two years on his deal, wants out and can't really get into an England team that isn't all that is incredible business by Dortmund. We are the only club in the world who'd pay that for him and it seems we are.

Any transfer that is completed, you can say only one club was ready to pay that much for the player (well in most cases)
 
Only stating the obvious :lol:, nothing revolutionary

It funny though, when a poster gets such tunnel vision that they completely lose track with reality.

We look like picking up Sancho for not much more than Chelsea paid for Kepa and Arsenal paid for Pepe, that’s the way I look at it. Transfer fees are mental when the selling club doesn’t really want rid and especially for young talents, as Pepe, Felix, Kepa & Dembele show us.
 
100%, if reports are to be believed, they wanted 120M euros as base fee!! with add-ons that will make the total fee be close to what Barca paid for Dembele.

Now, we are getting him for 95M euros as total fee, that's significantly less than what they wanted last year.
It was reported that Dortmund wanted most of the fee in one lump sum. So around £80m in one lump sum. So it was sensible to wait a year and sign the likes of Amad and Pellistri who we haven't even paid £15m for as things stand with the rest dependent on add ons and yearly payments.
 
Didnt fecking Napoli pay €70m for Victor Oshimen?

No wonder "selling clubs" are chancing their arm at mad transfer fee requests.

I think it’s gone mental with young talents as they retain such value.
We paid a pretty insane fee for Martial at the time but despite what some redcafe poster believe, I imagine we’d still recoup his fee at the very least.
 
Sorry, just read this.

I’d say Amad is in the same bracket simply because we paid over £20m for him with no experience. That isn’t even close to being normal. In fact, I’d say it is testimony of us ranking him in a similar category as any of the players mentioned.

Ultimately, I’m not against us having another winger. As I’ve been reminded a lot, City have a number of players. The difference is that those players are all established. Greenwood, Sancho and Amad will not simply be competing to play, they will be competing for the right to even develop. All players are in the developmental stage and need games to grow, City can only have one Foden IMO, 3 Foden’s in competition doesn’t make sense. So in a sense, if we were about to sign Son, for example, I think it would be different.

I don’t think you buy a player for £20-40m who has just turned 17 and played half an hour’s football without a clear plan to develop them or clear belief that you are talking of a player you back to become world class. Diallo is not the same as Chong.

Wouldn't you count Sancho as established? he played more than 130 games for BVB across 3 seasons, consistently starting games at top team like BVB, i would say he's already established at least in terms of experience, and although he is only 21 now, and can still develop further, I would put him in the same bracket of CR7 & Rooney, who joined the team as young teenagers but had plenty of top level experience and and were ready to be part of the 1st team right away and have an impact. Amad, although very talented, does not have much of experience yet, but I am confident he will gain the experience this season, we play on multiple fronts and there will be plenty of games that he will be part of.
 
It funny though, when a poster gets such tunnel vision that they completely lose track with reality.

We look like picking up Sancho for not much more than Chelsea paid for Kepa and Arsenal paid for Pepe, that’s the way I look at it. Transfer fees are mental when the selling club doesn’t really want rid and especially for young talents, as Pepe, Felix, Kepa & Dembele show us.


Indeed, young and very talented players who play in top leagues (PL, La Liga, League 1, BL, etc...) will go for high fees (60M++ euros), especially ones who are highly sought after by top clubs across Europe. De Ligt who played in Eredivisie with Ajax, cost Juve 75M as a 19 yo defender, same with De Jong, went for 75M to Barcelona.
 
Almost........closer........moving ahead.........nearing agreement.
 
Tbf that's due to him having one less year on his contact rather than us being good negotiators.

When you take that into consideration it's not much different. 95m Euros for a player with two years on his deal, wants out and can't really get into an England team that isn't all that is incredible business by Dortmund. We are the only club in the world who'd pay that for him and it seems we are.

So no other club would pay big money for one of the most promising young attacking players in Europe?

Do you really believe that?
 
Wouldn't you count Sancho as established? he played more than 130 games for BVB across 3 seasons, consistently starting games at top team like BVB, i would say he's already established at least in terms of experience, and although he is only 21 now, and can still develop further, I would put him in the same bracket of CR7 & Rooney, who joined the team as young teenagers but had plenty of top level experience and and were ready to be part of the 1st team right away and have an impact. Amad, although very talented, does not have much of experience yet, but I am confident he will gain the experience this season, we play on multiple fronts and there will be plenty of games that he will be part of.

Sort of. Personally, I don’t think we can simply extrapolate what he’s produced at Dortmund and immediately paste it into the PL with United. In fact, I expect some initial struggle. Which makes him a little more similar to the others, potentially for the first year. Only with loads of games willnhe get up speed, but I don’t expect much immediately. And because of this, I can’t help wonder what the same loads of games would do for Greenwood and Amad. All three of these are young players. 20 games is all it takes one to pass another, I focus more on ability and ingredients than achievement at this age. Because a player has played 60 games less at 18 doesn’t really mean much. He just hasn’t started yet. I remember getting into a debate last summer with someone on here who I can’t recall, who was insisting to me that Williams was better than Laird simply because he’s played and Laird hasn’t. Which at 19 years old each, is not that relevant. None of their stories have been written yet.
 
Advanced talks are advancing to more advance talks in advance of an announcement of more advanced talks I understand!
 
Saw what looked like Utd doing promotional or marketing photography on Stevenson square outside corner boy at 1030 today.

Guys in the photos being taken looked a bit like Sancho, though obviously not him as he's with England squad and wearing Utd zip up street wear top, smart casual.

Read in to it what you will :lol:.
 
Saw what looked like Utd doing promotional or marketing photography on Stevenson square outside corner boy at 1030 today.

Guys in the photos being taken looked a bit like Sancho, though obviously not him as he's with England squad and wearing Utd zip up street wear top, smart casual.

Read in to it what you will :lol:.
:lol:
 
Saw what looked like Utd doing promotional or marketing photography on Stevenson square outside corner boy at 1030 today.

Guys in the photos being taken looked a bit like Sancho, though obviously not him as he's with England squad and wearing Utd zip up street wear top, smart casual.

Read in to it what you will :lol:.
Were you casually bigdaytripping?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.