rotherham_red
Full Member
- Joined
- Mar 12, 2005
- Messages
- 7,416
Shame that people who know feck all about what's going on voice their so-called opinion after hearing crap on social media.
Shame that people who know feck all about what's going on voice their so-called opinion after hearing crap on social media.
The 'peace' demands made by Israel were disclaimered so ludicrously that not even a crony like Abbas could accept them, and deliberately so I should add. I don't believe them to be genuine and are entertained simply to provide cover for Israel’s takeover of the territories it wishes to control as well as sparing the United States embarrassment at the United Nations.
What do you see as Israel's long term objective? Just keep on building settlements across the entire WB? What's the end goal?
I'd imagine the visceral brutality of three grown men beating the hell out of a skinny teenage kid will trump anything the kid may have allegedly done, and any attempts to blame the kid for what happened to him will cast the Israeli government in an unflattering light. The international public may also be inclined to wonder how often this sort of thing goes on when the cameras aren't rolling.
I think their long term goal is to build enough settlements in enough strategic locations to make the creation of a contiguous Palestinian state effectively impossible, choking off vital points and roads etc.
They make eventually annex much of the West Bank (area C), make the few Palestinians there nationals and then tell the Palestinians in the rest of the West Bank and Gaza to do one, striking every once in a while as they currently do in Gaza if they create enough trouble within Israel.
I think they know that long term they can most likely come to peace with pretty much every other Arab country (and indeed they already talk to many of the ones they're not at peace with behind closed doors) because their leaders have passed the phase of suffering their own countries for the sake of the Palestinians. Most of the world won't be upset enough at their actions to create any real problems for them as that isn't how the world works and so it will be the Palestinians (or Arabs or cockroaches or whatever you wish to call them) who are shafted. Again.
I think Israeli governments want 'Peace' in the sense that they want quiet. In that sense, almost anybody who has ever ruled wants peace. Unfortunately, peace for Israel in that sense also means continued injustice for the Palestinians which is why they rarely accept the terms put in front of them and something that the Israelis seem incapable of understanding.
In reality as well, the Palestinians seem mostly ignorant as to why the Jews are so afraid and make little effort to assuage these fears.
I think the PA is a god send for them as well, allows them to do focus just on the day to days of occupation.
Why don't you just stop firing rockets if a.) you're anyway unable to kill any Jews and b.) in return you only get pounded by the IDF? Is that not even an option for you? I don't understand the logic.
Gaza and the WB are already de facto ghettos under Israeli control. The only way out is for it to become a legal reality and the whole place to become a single state.
American support for Israel is the main thing stopping it from happening. I don't know how that'll change any time soon.
I think their long term goal is to build enough settlements in enough strategic locations to make the creation of a contiguous Palestinian state effectively impossible, choking off vital points and roads etc.
They make eventually annex much of the West Bank (area C), make the few Palestinians there nationals and then tell the Palestinians in the rest of the West Bank and Gaza to do one, striking every once in a while as they currently do in Gaza if they create enough trouble within Israel.
I think they know that long term they can most likely come to peace with pretty much every other Arab country (and indeed they already talk to many of the ones they're not at peace with behind closed doors) because their leaders have passed the phase of suffering their own countries for the sake of the Palestinians. Most of the world won't be upset enough at their actions to create any real problems for them as that isn't how the world works and so it will be the Palestinians (or Arabs or cockroaches or whatever you wish to call them) who are shafted. Again.
I think Israeli governments want 'Peace' in the sense that they want quiet. In that sense, almost anybody who has ever ruled wants peace. Unfortunately, peace for Israel in that sense also means continued injustice for the Palestinians which is why they rarely accept the terms put in front of them and something that the Israelis seem incapable of understanding.
In reality as well, the Palestinians seem mostly ignorant as to why the Jews are so afraid and make little effort to assuage these fears.
I think the PA is a god send for them as well, allows them to do focus just on the day to days of occupation.
Pretty much this @Mihajlovic
It won't change because Israel controls America. I'm quoting war criminal Sharon here.
http://www.veteranstoday.com/2014/01/11/burying-sharon/
Conspiracionists etc.
A proper looney toons website.
Looney toon or not this quote is real and it doesn't even have to be real to justify the fact that America can't do anything against Israel because :
A) 1/3 of the US world aid goes to Israel.
B) Protected by more than 30 US vetoes in the UN.
C) Second most influencal lobby in the US.
And many more reasons. Saying the contrary is just a proof of bad faith.
If the plot is so obvious, and the Palestinians are dead certain to lose everything why haven't they ever considered acknowledging Israel's right to exist as a Jewish state in pre-1967 borders. You don't hold what's been termed here a "bargaining chip" that long.
What kind of culture lets it's young bathe in a war zone?Gaza
What kind of culture lets it's young bathe in a war zone?
What kind of culture lets it's young bathe in a war zone?
So what's your take on this latest flare up ?
Meanwhile, that great leftist Israeli *********** Uri Avnery – 90 years old and still, thankfully, going strong – has picked up on his country’s latest obsession: the danger that Isis will storm west from its Iraqi/Syrian “caliphate” and arrive on the east bank of the Jordan river.
“And Netanyahu said,” according to Avnery, “if they are not stopped by the permanent Israeli garrison there (on the Jordan river), they will appear at the gates of Tel Aviv.” The truth, of course, is that the Israeli air force would have crushed Isis the moment it dared to cross the Jordanian border from Iraq or Syria.
The importance of this, however, is that if Israel keeps its army on the Jordan (to protect Israel from Isis), a future “Palestine” state will have no borders and will be an enclave within Israel, surrounded on all sides by Israeli-held territory.
“Much like the South African Bantustans,” says Avnery. In other words, no “viable” state of Palestine will ever exist. After all, aren’t Isis just the same as Hamas? Of course not.
http://www.independent.co.uk/voices...israelis-arent-telling-this-week-9596120.html
"A future Palestine state will have no borders and be an enclave within Israel, surrounded on all sides by Israeli-held territory"
Its about time the truth was told. Their will be no two state solution.
Math's not your strong point.
There are already 2 countries carved out of 'palestine' - Jordan & Israel.
How many more are required?
Actually Egypt and Pakistan together get nearly as much as Israel, which in turn receives far less than Afghanistan. A bulk of American assistance goes to Muslim countries.
If we didn't have Iron Dome, we'd be counting a whole lot of bodies by now. Maybe my own, who knows.
Netanyahu is one hell of a warmonger, How many times has this idiot ordered air strikes on civilians now? Not cool man, any other country in the reigon that pulls this kind of stuff.....Well, we all know what happens to them.
Overdue.
Netanyahu could have avoided this by crushing Hamas last time round instead of backing off. Sharon could have avoided this by pulling out to in the first place.
Always tragic to see innocent lives taken, but such is the agenda of Islamic terror.
Doesnt change what he said though does it?
Erm.. yeah.
Overdue.
Netanyahu could have avoided this by crushing Hamas last time round instead of backing off. Sharon could have avoided this by pulling out to in the first place.
Always tragic to see innocent lives taken, but such is the agenda of Islamic terror.
Of course it does. It contextualizes US support in a broader context where Israel and Muslim countries are all beneficiaries of US support. If the US was just pro-Israel, it would certainly not give money to nations that have historically been at odds with Israel.
Great response.
You can't crush Hamas. Unless you kill millions. There will always be somebody willing to fight.
Hamas is a symptom not a cause.
You can't crush Hamas. Unless you kill millions. There will always be somebody willing to fight.
Hamas is a symptom not a cause.
What do you think they are doing now and have been doing in the past?
Being historically at odds with Israel is not the same as being actively against Israel now. Afghanistan and Pakistan get funds for a whole lot of different reasons and there are loads of strings attached while egypt is also acting more like Saudis when it comes to Israel rather than being actively against it.
The US is pro-Israel, its stupid to argue elsewise.
They do not give money to the countries, they give money to the regimes that help them solidify Israel's position in the region. Israel (and oil) is the basis for US' relation with any country in the region.Of course it does. It contextualizes US support in a broader context where Israel and Muslim countries are all beneficiaries of US support. If the US was just pro-Israel, it would certainly not give money to nations that have historically been at odds with Israel.
They do not give money to the countries, they give money to the regimes that help them solidify Israel's position in the region. Israel (and oil) is the basis for US' relation with any country in the region.
No one denied it was pro-Israel, but its also foolish to suggest it is anti-Muslim as the wealth gets spread quite nicely among Muslim nations, which contextualizes the original post a bit.
They are killing hundreds per years. Its a relatively low intensity conflict. If they really wanted too they could wipe out huge numbers. Of course it would be unacceptable to do so. The international community would have to step in then.
You mean like the UNESCO?Yes indeed, they give money to the governments. That's how it works with foreign assistance.
They do however also give a lot of money to civil society through USAID.