Israel - Palestine Discussion | Post Respectfully | Discuss more, tweet less

Killing Jews is literally in the Hamas charter.

"The Day of Judgement will not come about until Moslems fight the Jews (killing the Jews), when the Jew will hide behind stones and trees. The stones and trees will say O Moslems, O Abdulla, there is a Jew behind me, come and kill him".

It would therefore not be an exaggeration to say that Hamas exists to kill Israelis, because it is literally written into their founding document, the tenets of which were acted out once again as recently as 7 Oct.
It's not anymore though. Not since 2017.

Here's the document in full.
 
Israel slams Greta Thunberg after she backs Palestinians in Gaza

In reaction, Arye Sharuz Shalicar, spokesman for the Israeli army, told POLITICO: "Whoever identifies with Greta in any way in the future, in my view, is a terror supporter."

He added: "Because what Greta is doing, that she is now showing solidarity with Gaza while not saying a word about the massacres of Israelis, shows that she is actually not in favor of the Palestinians, but that she is sweeping the terror of the Palestinians or Hamas and Islamic Jihad under the table as if it did not exist."
https://www.politico.eu/article/gre...palestinian-strike-gaza-genocide-israel-slam/
 
There is however a huge difference between doing it intentionally as part of doctrine than one off situations that do happen from time to time with the IDF, which their soldiers should rightfully be punished for (but seldomly are).
thats fair upto a point, but then you have senior israeli politicians (especially amongst the current mob in power) whove made clear their dehumanising of palestinians, so no wonder the soldiers act without restraint. some of the things that are being said to them now, as they prepare for the invasion, ramping up the blood lust, gives me the chills.
 
It's not anymore though. Not since 2017.

Here's the document in full.

Yes, its well known that there was a revision under political pressure in 2017, but that doesn't negate the foundational purpose of why Hamas exists. Watering down the language to appear less embarrasingly despotic, then doing what they did 12 days ago, also don't align with one another. Nor do comments from its founder after the 2017 revision or other comments from Yahia Sinwar post 2017. They have proven themselves the same organization their founding charter sought to pursue.
 
Do you think anyone with something at stake believes that?

for all this talk of what may or may not be in Hamas's charter / constitution, this is Israels Basic Law - their constitution of sorts.

1 — Basic Principles

A. The land of Israel is the historical homeland of the Jewish people, in which the State of Israel was established.

B. The State of Israel is the national home of the Jewish people, in which it fulfills its natural, cultural, religious, and historical right to self-determination.

C. The right to exercise national self-determination in the State of Israel is unique to the Jewish people

Basically legalised Apartheid.
 
It's interesting how personal experiences shape people's interpretation of current events. In the Russia thread, it turned out that a tireless anti-German campaign from one poster was the result of the acronym "PIIGS" annoying a Greek. Now, the newest addition to the particularly enthusiastic Israel side is a German who is motivated by someone being mean 50 years ago.
 
It's interesting how personal experiences shape people's interpretation of current events. In the Russia thread, it turned out that a tireless anti-German campaign from one poster was the result of the acronym "PIIGS" annoying a Greek. Now, the newest addition to the particularly enthusiastic Israel side is a German who is motivated by someone being mean 50 years ago.

You have a way to put things in such a manner that hurt feelings are guaranteed. :lol:
 
Yes, its well known that there was a revision under political pressure in 2017, but that doesn't negate the foundational purpose of why Hamas exists. Watering down the language to appear less embarrasingly despotic, then doing what they did 12 days ago, also don't align with one another. Nor do comments from its founder after the 2017 revision or other comments from Yahia Sinwar post 2017. They have proven themselves the same organization their founding charter sought to pursue.
Oh, I agree with the watering down, just for the sake of accuracy. I personally don't see them as trustworthy, in any way. At the same time, I have zero trust in an Israeli government that has members who share the very same ideas about the Palestinians.

Do you think anyone with something at stake believes that?
Mate, before it goes any further. I'll copy-paste a post I've written about the same topic moments ago.

"Hamas actually amended its Charter in 2017 where it settles for a Palestinian state within the 1967 borders.

"While implicitely acknowledging that another entity will govern the rest, it still doesn't recognize Israel as a state. It also laid off the racist wording describing the Jews as "pigs" and states that it's not a religous war against the Jews but against the "Zionist Project". Whether it was a first step to acknowledge the other or a smokescreen, is everyone's guess. Make out of it what you will and it doesn't matter anymore.

The Fatah is by far the better choice and more reasonable dialogue partner but it's exactly the one that Israel chose to marginalize while propping up and indirectly financing the other. The Fatah also didn't cover itself in glory in the last two decades and Abbas, who's now 88 years old and largely rejected by the palestinian population, is still in power. It's in dire need of renewal, but its political platform is something everyone can work with and on. "
 
Oh, I agree with the watering down, just for the sake of accuracy. I personally don't see them as trustworthy, in any way. At the same time, I have zero trust in an Israeli government that has members who share the very same ideas about the Palestinians.

Agreed on both counts.
 
Hardly the point. People were saying their charter called for genocide, it doesn't.

Im sure their latest biggest terrorist attack in Israel's history puts their minds at ease when they have an updated charter to appeal to their on the fence supporters world wide.
 
for all this talk of what may or may not be in Hamas's charter / constitution, this is Israels Basic Law - their constitution of sorts.

1 — Basic Principles

A. The land of Israel is the historical homeland of the Jewish people, in which the State of Israel was established.

B. The State of Israel is the national home of the Jewish people, in which it fulfills its natural, cultural, religious, and historical right to self-determination.

C. The right to exercise national self-determination in the State of Israel is unique to the Jewish people

Basically legalised Apartheid.

This wasnt the question
 
Must give props to @HTG who seems to be the only German poster who hasn’t looked terrible in this thread.
 
Western Sahara comes closest perhaps. Although it’s still a bit different. I wrote this in this thread back in May:

In other analogous military occupations, the occupier has either annexed the territory in question and extended citizenship to all its inhabitants (e.g. Morocco in Western Sahara, China in Tibet, some would argue India in Kashmir), or expelled the undesirable population in the midst of war and declared independence (e.g. North Cyprus, or going further back, Israel in 1948, Turkey in 1919-22). I really can’t think of anything to compare to Israel’s refusal to either annex the territory or end the occupation, and by extension Israel’s refusal to declare its borders

As of today, that distinction is correct. I had always assumed though that the end goal is annexation and population replacement by making the lives of the remaining Palestinians so miserable that the population withers away through exile. A death by a thousand cuts, which is easier for the international community to ignore than a quick annexation and expulsion.
 
That's great, frank and open. Very enlightening. She's brilliant.

Yeah. Couragous and insightful. She deserves an award for that.

Also, couldn't help but notice Meshal's "I know I'm full of shit, but am going to say it anyway" facial expressions throughout.
 
I tend to agree with you. This thread isn’t offering information anymore, it’s just a virtual battlefield for some people. The story of the hospital was quite shocking to me. The amount of people who wrote posts completely convinced to be on the right side, abandoning all care in the process, was problematic, to say the least. Even more so when you see that the very same people have learned absolutely nothing from it and just continue the exact same way.
The most annoying thing, however, is how wilfully people misrepresent the opinions of others in the worst possible way. There’s no more margin of error. No benefit of the doubt. Just waiting for any snippet of a post that could be interpreted in a bad way, so you can call someone something horrible.

Yeah, well said.
 
You have a way to put things in such a manner that hurt feelings are guaranteed. :lol:

Knowing that it might impact wars half a century in the future, I should probably stop.

I know who the poster is, but that reference got lost on me?

It turned out that the European debt crisis was at the center of it all, with Germany receiving most of the blame of how the Union treated Greece's problems. The acronym refers to Portugal, Ireland, Italy, Greece and Spain, the countries hardest hit. It's a bit derogatory, and that user took it extremely personally. I couldn't really find any examples of Germans using it, though.
 
Yeah. Couragous and insightful. She deserves an award for that.

His calm matter of fact manner about the inevitable casualties is chilling and but notably honest. It shows the mindset we are engaging with. And more honesty, as hard as it is to hear, is required to untangle. The double speak from all sides is absurd.

That said, the lines about focusing on military targets rings very hollow after the initial attacks.
 
Knowing that it might impact wars half a century in the future, I should probably stop.



It turned out that the European debt crisis was at the center of it all, with Germany receiving most of the blame of how the Union treated Greece's problems. The acronym refers to Portugal, Ireland, Italy, Greece and Spain, the countries hardest hit. It's a bit derogatory, and that user took it extremely personally. I couldn't really find any examples of Germans using it, though.
Didnt know Alexis Tsipras was posting on the caf
 


It’s crazy seeing the disconnect between world leaders and the people they govern. Israelis in Israel against Bibi and the War. Palestinians protesting against Abbas’ leadership. Egyptians fighting against Sisi. There’s another protest tomorrow in London (there’s actually 2) and similarly we’ve seen the French defy Macron and the Germans defy their fascist-lite laws. There’s also a sit in of US based Jews in DC against the US position (as well as the poll above).
 
He may refer to them just for convenience sake or...he really believes that Hamas is a legitimate resistance organisation and he takes inspiration from the Soviets, Algerians, Vietnamese and Afghans fighting aqainst an invader/occupier.
 
That was much needed post. She's not only a great job but also shed a light on the mindset of the Hamas.

The mindset of Hamas (ie. he brazenly lied to her face about targeting civilians) as well as the broader Arab mindset that they don't want to get dragged into a regional war based on a tragic miscalculation made by Hamas leaders.
 
I think what Israel is doing is creating a new badge of anti-semites which is rather unfortunate. This does not make sense anymore and the US are the bigger cnuts for vetoing the UN security resolution. Everyone can now see why Israel keep building settlements because the US nodge them on. The obstacle to peace in this region is the US
 
Not sure if I'm from the same generation as you, I'm in my 50's.

But this narrative is false.
There is literally quotes from way back that "prove" this to be false. In writings from various factions involved.

There are quotes literally saying there is no right to claim to the land 2000 years, or whatever, after but it will give an ally for Suez, for example.

The notion of rights and freedom for the "natives" was discussed. Certain proposals put forward. The acknowledgement of what the it's bits and maybes would be discussed at length.

People claiming to want "philosophical discussions" won't even accept the "proofs" put forward. A case in point is the whole "only democracy in the Middle East". People more knowl dgeable and literate than me laugh at this. Even from the Jewish side. Yet no we on here push a narrative. Get pulled on it and all of a sudden it's "people don't want to engage..."

More like people have picked a side and just push BS

I am in my later 70's so I have a few years on you.

Not sure what the narrative is that you refer to?

My earliest memory of the Palestine/Israel situation was of my uncle telling me about when he served in the Palestine Police and of a friend of his from that service who (so my uncle claimed) later tried to arrest Mencham Begin when he came on a state visit to Britain as Israel's PM. Begin had been the leader of a militant breakaway faction (Irgun) in Israel, and apparently there was still an outstanding warrant for his arrest, from the 1940's which my uncle's mate tried to serve when Begin stepped off the plane. This story fascinated me, but I cannot remember the name of my uncle's friend, or even if this event took place at all, in fact I can only find a reference to Begin being arrested in September 1940.

My Uncle's story did however heighten my interest and as I was now in my mid twenties (and no longer believed everything my uncle told me) I took an interest in trying to keep up and understand what was happening in that part of the world and after the 1973 Yom Kippur war when Israel's eventual victory over three of the surrounding Arab states, changed everything for Israel, from simply trying to survive to becoming the continuing occupier of land in the West Bank (that took place in 1967 ) and a major player in the middle East.

At the end of WW2 it appeared that Britain was glad to get out of the mandate for Palestine (held from after WW1 up to 1948) at least my uncle confirmed this for me, when despite my ability to find things out for myself he continued to regale me with his exploits in the ME.

The hatred that seems to have been the only thing sustained between the parties on both sides over the intervening years, has a times seemed close to being suppressed (if not over come) but never has; whilst the 'to the death' emphasis which always seems to pervade beneath the surface in any of the attempts to search for peace is removed, it is difficult to see how things can get better, for either side... or indeed the world.
 
The mindset of Hamas (ie. he brazenly lied to her face about targeting civilians) as well as the broader Arab mindset that they don't want to get dragged into a regional war based on a tragic miscalculation made by Hamas leaders.

Yeah, the dogma rather than any politicking was mad. Usually they'd avoid that lie so close to it being proven thus.
 
His calm matter of fact manner about the inevitable casualties is chilling and but notably honest. It shows the mindset we are engaging with. And more honesty, as hard as it is to hear, is required to untangle. The double speak from all sides is absurd.

That said, the lines about focusing on military targets rings very hollow after the initial attacks.

You know someone is full of shit when they say we only focus on military targets but then took circa 200 people captive into Gaza.