africanspur
Full Member
- Joined
- Sep 1, 2010
- Messages
- 9,846
- Supports
- Tottenham Hotspur
I disagree that she’s providing an objective point of view. I disagree that anybody in the Israeli or US government would seriously consider her objective. So she’s not calling on Israel to do anything. She’s fermenting hate through her following and support by pushing a narrative that justifies the terrorism happening as she posts.
She is a member of the legislature of the United States government. Her job is to represent her district of the United States, and the interests of the United States. The president decides foreign policy, not a house rep in a fringe conference.
Worth noting there’s been bipartisan criticism of her comments.
Can you outline the parts of what she said exactly that you disagree with? The majority of what she said is not that different to some of your own comments and viewpoints on this thread.
1) I grieve lives lost on both sides
2) She wants everyone to live a future without fear and with rights
3) The path to that includes lifting the blockade and not having an apartheid system
4) Thinking that you can just blockade/ create a system of apartheid and you will always be able to keep a lid on the pot as it were is a dangerous approach and probably not an accurate viewpoint
5) Nobody should live in fear of violence
6) As long as the USA essentially unconditionally supports Israel (rightly or wrongly), the takeaway message will be you can do whatever you want.
Other than perhaps point 6, this doesn't seem that different to what you've posted on this thread?