DavidDeSchmikes
Full Member
- Joined
- Jan 20, 2013
- Messages
- 18,300
Don't think it too far off until we see drone-based acts of terror on a target like a stadium, etc. in the near future.Yeah, the Ukraine war has really brought to light the effectiveness of drones, which Hamas appear to have used in this attack as well. Can't see any other result of this than a full on Israeli takeover of Gaza at this point, as anything short of that will be seen as weakness that emboldens more future attacks. Also worth bearing in mind that we're dealing with Netanyahu here, not Lapid or Bennett.
Unfortunately, it won't work and as with every previous rocket attack campaign, will result in the needless deaths of hundreds or thousands of people in Gaza.
Yeah, the Ukraine war has really brought to light the effectiveness of drones, which Hamas appear to have used in this attack as well. Can't see any other result of this than a full on Israeli takeover of Gaza at this point, as anything short of that will be seen as weakness that emboldens more future attacks. Also worth bearing in mind that we're dealing with Netanyahu here, not Lapid or Bennett.
Don't think it too far off until we see drone-based acts of terror on a target like a stadium, etc. in the near future.
I'm talking worldwide.I agree. This feels like a 9/11 type situation in Israel. I don't think the leadership matters when the populace goes completely bloodthirsty. They are backed into a corner and can only be reined in should international partners choose to do so. There may be the question of low Nato ammo stocks etc, but gaza is quite tiny, and if they choose the level of brutality we expect, it will be over soon. They won't allow the sort of urban warfare that we see in Ukraine; they'll flatten it.
The hostage thing is somewhat interesting, but I feel we're going to see more Entebbe than negotiation.
They've been trying that for years. Israeli security is pretty good in that respect. Ordnance a problem too.
I'm talking worldwide.
A simple grenade or light ordnance dropped from a drone into the seats at an event would be like a mini-suicide bomb but with far less variables on the terrorist's end.
I don't think you can blame Russia here; they don't benefit from Israeli instability these days.
None, except to get the hell out of there and make a life for themselves elsewhere. Ideally with reparation payments from regional powers primarily Israel and Jordan. Realistically I agree with you.
It's why there's so much immigration to the West from the rest of the world. (and from the USA!) Because there is a tacit acceptance that they have 'lost' and need to get out of there before dying to a local warlord or local authority.
There's next to no coverage about the Russian atrocities in Syria, or about Turkey. I'd say there's more focus on Israel than either.
Of course they benefit greatly. Every new problem for the western world that requieres attention and financial help weakens the unity and actual help to Ukraine. Russia wants to overwhelm the west with wars and refugees so they can't focus on Ukraine. Putin doesn't even hide it when he talks about colonial reign of the Anglo Saxons is over.
So self ethnic cleansing in effect, with little pushes by Israel?
I thought you meant Russian atrocities in Ukraine, of which there is of course almost non stop coverage in the west.
Pretending that Lavrov is important or in the inner circle is naive. He's always hated Israel. Russia benefits from this chaos, but they also benefit from Israeli victory.
So self ethnic cleansing in effect, with little pushes by Israel?
The Guardian - People drink, snack and pose for selfies against a background of explosions as Palestinian death toll mounts in ongoing offensive
Yes. This is what is expected of occupants in the West Bank/Gaza. Bend over and take it, or move somewhere else. Sing Kumbaya/We Shall Overcome as you exit please.
What conflict in history has ended differently? The cleansing in the US, Canada, Australia, Roman Empire, South Africa, Iran, China, and everywhere else has ended like this.
By far most wars in history did not end in ethnic cleansing. You can't just list places (and the Roman Empire, like that didn't last two thousand years in many different forms and had an extremely diverse ethnic, linguistic and religious composition) as if that's some kind of argument.
Just a reminder of what life is like in Isreal and Gaza
I thought we are living in the most morally superior times in the planet's history. Guess i was wrong.Which war with which an indigenous population which was faced with a superior armed 'settler' occupier, did not end like this? Say in the last 200 years. Even stuff like the Boer wars and WWII ended with ethnic cleansing.
Anyone else initially failed to realize that the Iron Dome failed? The pictures of missiles and rockets impacts made no sense for a few minutes.
I thought we are living in the most morally superior times in the planet's history. Guess i was wrong.
Anyone else initially failed to realize that the Iron Dome failed? The pictures of missiles and rockets impacts made no sense for a few minutes.
Hard to say it failed. More like overwhelmed by the number of rockets. I don't think its set up for such a volume of inbound in such a short period of time.
Hard to say it failed. More like overwhelmed by the number of rockets. I don't think its set up for such a volume of inbound in such a short period of time.
Exactly, it failed. There is a good reason for it but it failed, if a cable overheat due to overload then we still state that the cable fail. It's not a criticism but a simple observation.
Yes they always do. The appropriate response is what the Uk would do if this happened on our soil. Especially a nation that lost 6.5 million people due to anti semitism.Do people condemn Israel for fighting back against Hamas or do people condemn Israel for killing civilians? Pretty big distinction there I think
What do you think the appropriate response by Israel is to this, just out of interest? Would Israel be justified in carpet bombing Gaza and killing Palestinian civilians now, in your view?
Who said that it was magic?
Yes they always do. The appropriate response is what the Uk would do if this happened on our soil. Especially a nation that lost 6.5 million people due to anti semitism.
The world failed the Jews, it’s failing them again. Make no mistake, not a single country in the Middle East would blink an eye lid if Israel got wipe off the face of the earth, in fact this is their wet dream.
I'm not saying you called it magic, I'm saying it does have coverage limits like any missile defense system does
Correct. It is ethnic cleansing. Israel are in the wrong. But you asked what choice they have. And my belief is they have the same choice as refugees in any number of countries. Do you believe they have a better option?
And yes, Ukraine is the darling of the Western media as it's in Europe, on the doorsteps of NATO, and Russia is the foe. The same as Palestine gets airtime because it's an Arab priority and result of colonial power play. Objectively there are sadly many worse things happening in the world, which the west just doesn't care about. (Except to say NO REFUGEES, GO AWAY AND DIE) I'd rather live in the Palestinian Territories than about 100 countries in the world sadly...
If Iran is behind this (I would be extremely surprised if them and Russia are not involved), Israel will likely retaliate heavily against them. We already know that Israel’s F35 fly over Teheran, they can also bomb Teheran.For Hamas it won't work because Israel is too strong. But they're being played by Iran anyways and for Iran, it works perfectly according to their plan. They force Israel into a long guerilla fight that costs billions, weakens them on a financial and social level and widens the rift even further in the region. Every effort to normalize relations to other muslim countries is destroyed and the Mullah regime grows stronger.
@Solius @Rado_N @golden_blunder @Damien @Niall are you guys going to allow someone to label Jewish people or Israelis as Nazis? Does that fly on redcafe.net?
If Iran is behind this (I would be extremely surprised if them and Russia are not involved), Israel will likely retaliate heavily against them. We already know that Israel’s F35 fly over Teheran, they can also bomb Teheran.
Curious how you arrived at a consensus on behalf of most on here? And not sure why it matters, in any case, what most on here would have to say. You asked me in particular and I'm not subject to most on here.
Your question and your follow-up are also incongruous. If Party A asks for peace and Party B says no, then it is Party B who opposes the peace at that point. If you meant to ask, whether I would say Party B was right or wrong in refusing the peace offer, that is an entirely different question. That could depend indeed, on whether it is militarily advantageous for the offering party, and therefore duplicitous; whether the offer does not provide reasonable assurances of good relations; whether the offer makes no genuine concessions, and so forth.
I also doubt "most on here" if that is the standard of right and wrong you choose to adopt, would then subsequently agree that Ukrainians would be right to enter Russian cities and massacre innocent civilians in a truly barbraric and depraved fashion.
Iran isn't behind it, but they are well known to be arms suppliers to Hezbollah and Hamas, and of course are rabidly anti-Israel. Ultimately, the attack is all on Hamas and its them and the people of Gaza that will bear the brunt of the retaliation, which I presume will involve a ground war into Gaza to dismantle Hamas and reoccupy the land.
So what's the latest situation on the ground?