Charlie Foley
Full Member
- Joined
- Mar 11, 2012
- Messages
- 19,376
Why not let there be an investigation (though I don't know what good it would do, whoever opposed it would just scream bias).
A very Trumpian twitter handbags between the two of them. Sad!
Some stuff doing the rounds on pro-Israeli sources which, if legitimate, may slightly complicate the prevailing narrative:
Hamas leader Mahmud az-Zahar:
First alleged Hamas and PIJ martyrdom commemorations released:
Shin Bet claim to have identified 24 of the dead as Hamas or PIJ operatives so far - https://www.ynetnews.com/articles/0,7340,L-5261458,00.html
Trump started all this, he is a pioneer in this respect.A very Trumpian twitter handbags between the two of them. Sad!
Trump started all this, he is a pioneer in this respect.
A shame he won't allow a trustworthy investigation isn't it?Trump started all this, he is a pioneer in this respect.
It is so sad, but at the same time, why an 8 months old baby is in the protest? Mindfeck.http://www.middleeasteye.net/news/gaza-names-palestinians-killed-israel-us-embassy-1239370023
Gaza killings: Names and faces of those killed by Israeli forces this week
Possible the snipers were taking out known Hamas operatives?
Yes.A shame he won't allow a trustworthy investigation isn't it?
It is so sad, but at the same time, why an 8 months old baby is in the protest? Mindfeck.
Oh wow. Wasn't expecting that at all.Netanyahu and Erdogan going at it:
A lot of people have absolutely clear positions here, which was a crucial part why a debate about @Fearless evolved in the first place. It's not that everybody was kind of open, and he suddenly burst in claiming something about himself. It is normal such questions come up to an extent, but somewhere it goes too far.
How many eight month old girls have been indoctrinated into this Jihadist cause? There were a few children who were older than that but fortunately they were also killed during the protest so better safe than sorry, eh?I have zero sympathy for their Jihadist cause built on their self admitted failed attempts to kill Jews.
Israel has borders? When did they declare them?It is difficult to know what the Israelis soldiers could do. They were there to protect the border.
How about inviting the Hamas political leadership to participate in negotiations towards a peaceful settlement in accordance with the two-state settlement as endorsed by the overwhelming majority of world states?But what other response was realistically available to them which would not have resulted in danger to themselves or the people they were protecting?
Where did he say he has "condemned" it?He is the only one saying he condemns something while defending it without actually condemning it.
Oh please. Hamas using suicide bombers like 15 years ago deserves condemnation. Hamas firing ineffective homemade rockets years ago is a cry for help. Hamas approaching the fence facing almost certain death or maiming is...well...the same as thousands of other Palestinian civilians trying to break out of an increasingly uninhabitable prison.If you can’t tell that Hamas is the big Elephant in the room and is orchestrating these protests, then the flaw is with your denial.
Where did he say he has "condemned" it?
So you can personally guarantee that Hamas will not now, nor never in the near future, use suicide bombs and/or rockets to attack Israel?Oh please. Hamas using suicide bombers like 15 years ago deserves condemnation. Hamas firing ineffective homemade rockets years ago is a cry for help. Hamas approaching the fence facing almost certain death or maiming
In Hamas’ own charter they call for the destruction of Israel. Not sure how you can expect to negotiate with a terror organisation that’s top purpose is to destroy youHow about inviting the Hamas political leadership to participate in negotiations towards a peaceful settlement in accordance with the two-state settlement as endorsed by the overwhelming majority of world states?
So he has basically made it clear he won't condemn the IDFs action on the terms of the majority in this thread. So have, using other words and argumentations, several other posters, me included.Exactly my point, he is saying he has made his sentiment about the attack clear and has not said its "okay" while defending it at the same time.
Can’t believe @Fearless is not getting a ban for some of his disgraceful, cold comments on here.
Ffs people got a ban for fat shaming on the Eurovision thread!
The ignore feature is also an option.
Can’t believe @Fearless is not getting a ban for some of his disgraceful, cold comments on here.
Ffs people got a ban for fat shaming on the Eurovision thread!
i dont agree with most of his post in here but why does a ban need to be issued everytime someone says something unpleasant to the status quo.
agreedIt doesn't need to be issued. Emotions generally run high in these threads, which is unavoidable.
Done!
This phenomenon where people put people on ignore for their views on a particular(especially political) topic on a football forum is stupid to me. Its like me putting @Pogue Mahone on ignore because he likes Danny Welbeck and then miss out on his bitcoin thread.
So he has basically made it clear he won't condemn the IDFs action on the terms of the majority in this thread. So have, using other words and argumentations, several other posters, me included.
Netanyahu and Erdogan going at it:
Netanyahu is a total douchebag but some cheet from Erdogan complaining about morality to anyone, what the feck are you doing with the Kurds you absolute nincompoop?
Erdogan is doing what he does best, trying to glorify himself as the quasi Sultan by paying lip service to the Palestinian struggle, much to the delight of the Muslim world.Netanyahu is a total douchebag but some cheet from Erdogan complaining about morality to anyone, what the feck are you doing with the Kurds you absolute nincompoop?
I’ve always said that parallels exist between the respective struggles of the Kurds and Palestinians, the same can be said of Erdogan and Nutty.They're quite similar in some ways.
Hm, do you really want to go into a lengthy internet debate about how to correctly interprete various posts in this thread? Especially since we probably won't agree in the end anyway? I don't, tbh.Nope that's the furthest from what he has said, how about a you read up before jumping to his defense.