Classical Mechanic
Full Member
'The sun will never set on the British empire'
That phrase was used in relation to the land mass if encompassed i.e. the sun literally never set on the British Empire. Nothing to do with longevity.
'The sun will never set on the British empire'
Do you support Hamas? Yes or no?
It really is David v Goliath.Here's a picture of one the weapons
More effective getting it's people shot then risk getting flattened.
There's some good debate in the Middle East Politics thread and in some of the older threads relating to the conflict. A reactive thread like this probably isn't the best place to actually learn anything. Would you like some recommended books/articles or stuff like that?
A thought on today, the 70th anniversary of the founding of the State of Israel.
The difficult images coming out of Gaza paint a dark picture on the 70th anniversary of the founding of the State of Israel. For those of us who grew up in strongly Zionist communities, the State of Israel always filled us with pride as Jews and secular global citizens. Today, and over the past month, it has been extremely difficult to reconcile my personal support for Israel with what is happening on the border. Not only has Israel poorly handled the situation (to be fair it was always going to be lose-lose) , but they have done a great deal to shift international opinion against them. The US has also done a great deal to inflame the situation by disregarding the USG position on the status of a two state solution (1967 borders),and giving the Likud government a blank check.
Hamas is not without blame for the current situation as well. An elected organization that receives billions of dollars could chose to work to invest in the community that it governs, but it does not. It has failed the people of Gaza and used Israel as the perfect foil to paper over those failures.
It’s hard to not view the current situation as tremendous tragedy not just for the loss of life, but the ultimate goal of a two state solution. Current leadership has no motive for getting a deal done, but it is not them who will suffer, it is the people on the ground who will.
Through all this though, I still believe that the people-normal people- who wake up and go to work everyday and just want to be able to have a normal life, want peace and for that I am optimistic and will keep supporting the work of those working towards a two state solution.
Those who plead their cause in the absence of an opponent can invent to their heart's content, can pontificate without taking into account the opposite point of view and keep the best arguments for themselves, for aggressors are always quick to attack those who have no means of defence.
That phrase was used in relation to the land mass if encompassed i.e. the sun literally never set on the British Empire. Nothing to do with longevity.
It really is David v Goliath.
They should have flicked elastic bands. Would have garnered even more sympathy.
Yep. Betraying of true sentiments I feel. Given the loss of life, regardless of one's political views it is an odd thing to choose to type and post imoSome really cold and callous comments in this thread
Yep. Betraying of true sentiments I feel. Given the loss of life, regardless of one's political views it is an odd thing to choose to type and post imo
Perhaps that has been your intention, and fair enough if so. We are on the same page there. But some of your other comments have, to me at least, clouded your 'clear sentiments.' Your right to speak how you want, though.I've made my sentiments clear about this tragedy. Don't confuse that with exposing Hamas's agenda.
I'll always accept recommended articles and literature.
I have actually studied the conflict a bit, I didn't mean to sound like a total novice. But knowledge is a continuous journey etc., and normally I like to hear from people in/from the region affected.
They should have flicked elastic bands. Would have garnered even more sympathy.
Cheers!Ah OK. Well I'll refrain from posting a bibliography of recommended readings here for the moment. In the meantime I think this is a decent enough take on the heart of the continuing problem, as told by an Israeli:
The Real Dispute Driving the Israeli-Palestinian Conflict
A cycle of denial has defined the shared existence of neighboring peoples for seven decades.
He has a new book out now called "Letters to My Palestinian Neighbor" which is getting good reviews.
Very rich coming from an advocate of a so-called state, that has built its entire existence on sympathy. I find it hard to believe you actually believe the nonsense you spout. Just because you keep repeating the same nonsense with fingers in your ears doesn't make your points any more valid.
You are very flawed and clearly lack conscious and critical thinking. You expect us to consciously accept your propaganda with out much consideration while any response is met with a brick wall. Your state is far more dangerous than the fairy tale threats you try to paint that supposedly endanger Isreals existence. The real threat is in your mind.
The 'Isreal is defending itself' card may actually hold more weight if every conflicted event didnt end in countless dead Palestinians.
You lost me at 'so-called state'.
I've made my sentiments clear about this tragedy. Don't confuse that with exposing Hamas's agenda.
Well the sun certainly does set on what's left of it now
I'm sorry, but this a rather ridiculous a priori demand for a discussion in a forum like this one. Sounds more like a Soviet Union style show trial.You haven't actually. All you've said is you don't condone it, followed by a statement of fact about the death toll. That leaves an awful lot of blanks to fill in. Do you view it as an atrocity? Do you condemn it? Do you have sympathy for the dead and their loved ones?
...should be enough for you.All you've said is you don't condone it, followed by a statement of fact about the death toll.
I'm sorry, but this a rather ridiculous a priori demand for a discussion in a forum like this one. Sounds more like a Soviet Union style show trial.
You'll simply have to live with the blanks, so this...
...should be enough for you.
You can then still criticize someone's positions, or omissions, or moral inconsistencies, or whatever you think you've found.
Boycotting Israel wouldn’t be enough, you’d need to target their enablers. As of now Israeli interests appear to take precedence over US ones, so much for “America always comes first”.
A lot of people have absolutely clear positions here, which was a crucial part why a debate about @Fearless evolved in the first place. It's not that everybody was kind of open, and he suddenly burst in claiming something about himself. It is normal such questions come up to an extent, but somewhere it goes too far.I don't think I've found anything. I was just saying his position was not clear. Many people's position in this thread is not clear, but they aren't claiming it is. If he doesn't want to respond he doesn't have to. Talk about an overreaction...
That status omits the fact that the infrastructure in Gaza is bombed repeatedly by Israel. I've lost count of the amount of buildings built by EC or UNRWA, or ICRC funding that have been destroyed by Israeli bombs mere months after they were built.I'll always accept recommended articles and literature.
I have actually studied the conflict a bit, I didn't mean to sound like a total novice. But knowledge is a continuous journey etc., and normally I like to hear from people in/from the region affected.
Two friends of mine went to Birthright a few years ago, one of them posted this about the protests. I thought it was quite good, though I had to fix a few punctuation errors!
Sorry I keep raising it but I still don’t understand this massively irrational support for Israel by the west, it’s astounding.
The defining feature of all Empires is that they fall. Israel isn’t an empire though and they have nukes. There would need to be a similarly armed state backing the Palestinians to halt them but to destroy them, don’t see it happening.
Its quite amazing reasing the different views of those that support the palestines and those who support the jews. I have learnt alot from this thread about the way both sides see things. Its extraordinary. Saw this image today and thought it was an interesting share.
Its quite amazing reasing the different views of those that support the palestines and those who support the jews. I have learnt alot from this thread about the way both sides see things. Its extraordinary. Saw this image today and thought it was an interesting share.
It all comes down to messianic fanatics in the US
It all comes down to messianic fanatics in the US
I really can't be arsed what they wanna call them self's. I just meant the pro Israel vs the rest .Hate to be that guy but it's not as binary as 'Palestinians vs Jews'. There are Jewish critics of the state of Israel as there are non-Jewish supporters of it. Also worth remembering that Palestinians are both of Islamic and Christian persuasion.
To be fair, Hamas store weapons in schools, mosques and hospitals. It makes the situation a lot more complex than you’re portraying:That status omits the fact that the infrastructure in Gaza is bombed repeatedly by Israel. I've lost count of the amount of buildings built by EC or UNRWA, or ICRC funding that have been destroyed by Israeli bombs mere months after they were built.
That person may say that Hamas should still do more, but even when public buildings and infrastructure is built up in the region it gets decimated every single time. Also, Israel controls everything that comes in or out of the control by land, air or sea. It's not an autonomous place at all. Even in the last bout of conflict, Israel controlled what was going to come in to Gaza and any time building materials were brought in, they were promptly rejected because Israel argued they were going to be used for tunnels. So please ask your friend how exactly he submits that Hamas should be doing more?
Also, please let him/her know that the 2 state solution is dead (seriously, either of the two options available to them right now will almost certainly be unpalatable to Israel - a) give citizenship to Palestinian Arabs which would be a demographic time bomb; or b) agree to sit and thrash out a 2 state solution - that won't happen because they would have to acquiesce East Jerusalem). Also, normal every day Israelis are the ones who vote in the likes of Likud and have done repeatedly over the past decade (even longer when you go back to that feckwit Sharon) even in spite of Bibi's corruption and his bloodlust. Even now, the vast majority have backed the actions of the IDF over the last month or so, with approval rates of upwards of 60%.
Yeah good luck boycotting AmericaThat won't work either since their so called enablers are powerful and wealthy.