He is not and never was. He's a zionist and a racist, just like the figureheads of his administration in charge of the Middle-East.Biden will be supposedly furious, and still go ahead with it.
The reason Israel acts as it does is because it knows no red line exists for it. It's got the US by the balls.
The ICC prosecutor wants a warrant for Netanyahu and Gallant for war crimes and crimes against humanity (blocked by the US, the UK and Germany as of yet).Definitely agree with this post, especially the bolded bit and there's no reason for anyone to be badly misinformed now.
Also worth noting that the Lancet isn't the only reputable organization that believes the deaths are closer to 200k than the official number.
Indeed, and even if it was peer-reviewed it wouldn't mean it is true. But with it not being peer-reviewed, it is basically the authors opinion backed by not much.Not trying to downplay the scale of the death here but since this number is being widely cited, for the sake of accuracy it's worth saying it wasn't a peer reviewed paper, or a report, it was a letter. I don't know if the 5x multiplier is bad scholarship, but there is a review of that number here which looks at the assumptions behind it.
One year in numbers:
How about you do ratio of civilians killed on October 7 and the same ratio of war Gaza and Lebanon.Didn't mention the fact that 83% of rocket exchanges with Lebanon have come from the Israeli side?
And how about you do one on number of civilians, namely women and children killed too.
How about you do ratio of civilians killed on October 7 and the same ratio of war Gaza and Lebanon.
No.Weren't 50% of the people killed on Oct 7 active members of the IDF? Given that number of women and children killed there is no way any Israeli propaganda can say the same number for Gaza and Lebanon.
Wikipedia has it at approx. 33% of the people killed on October 7th being members of the security forces. Still, there is no way a third of the deaths in Gaza in the least year have been Hamas militants.Weren't 50% of the people killed on Oct 7 active members of the IDF? Given that number of women and children killed there is no way any Israeli propaganda can say the same number for Gaza and Lebanon.
Sure.How about you do ratio of civilians killed on October 7 and the same ratio of war Gaza and Lebanon.
Sure.
1195 total deaths, of which 695 were civilians. Its strongly suggested a bulk of those were killed by Israel themselves as part of the Hannibal directive. So a generous approximation would be 2:1 in favour of civilians.
Gaza has women and children deaths at 69%, so even if you go with the ridiculous IOF propaganda that assumes every Palestinian male adult is a Hamas member, its still not particularly great.
I've not seen any numbers verifying the number of civilians killed in Lebanon, but let me guess - the bulk of them are Hezbollah members?
From March this year.Of course, the true number of Gaza civilian deaths is unknown. The current Hamas-supplied estimate of over 31,000 does not acknowledge a single combatant death (nor any deaths due to the misfiring of its own rockets or other friendly fire). The IDF estimates it has killed about 13,000 Hamas operatives, a number I believe credible partly because I believe the armed forces of a democratic American ally over a terrorist regime, but also because of the size of Hamas fighters assigned to areas that were cleared and having observed the weapons used, the state of Hamas' tunnels and other aspects of the combat.
That would mean some 18,000 civilians have died in Gaza, a ratio of roughly 1 combatant to 1.5 civilians. Given Hamas' likely inflation of the death count, the real figure could be closer to 1 to 1. Either way, the number would be historically low for modern urban warfare.
The UN, EU and other sources estimate that civilians usually account for 80 percent to 90 percent of casualties, or a 1:9 ratio, in modern war (though this does mix all types of wars). In the 2016-2017 Battle of Mosul, a battle supervised by the U.S. that used the world's most powerful airpower resources, some 10,000 civilians were killed compared to roughly 4,000 ISIS terrorists.
And yet, analysts who should know better are still engaging in condemnation of the IDF based on the level of destruction that's still occurred—destruction that is unavoidable against an enemy that embeds in a vast tunnel system under civilian sites in dense urban terrain. This effects-based condemnation or criticism is not how the laws of war work, or violations determined. These and other analysts say the destruction and civilian causalities must either stop or be avoided in an alternative form of warfare.
That's a great post, to be fair.Internal Iranian politics is incredibly complex. The people are definitely begging for normalisation and the reformist faction was certainly keen on opening up (Khatami gave intel to the US on the Taliban in 2000, which was paving way for more normal ties) - but ever since Bush's "Axis of Evil" speech the reformists have lost pretty much all influence in the country.
The country is in effect a mafia state run by the IRGC. They control all aspects of the economy, run foreign policy (it wasn't the President who authorised the missile barrage) and the last thing they want is normalisation and/or liberalisation - because they'll be on the chopping block. Their power and existence is directly tied to confrontational policies with the west - they are deeply against the JCPOA (ironically hardliners in Israel, US and Iran all tend to agree on similar things).
I can't recommend "Revolutionary Iran" by Michael Axworthy enough - paints the politics around the revolution and the 1980s very well. At the end of the day Netanyahu and Khamanei are two sides of the same coin - total cnuts.
This is an opinion piece with some absolutely laughable lines:
The IDF estimates it has killed about 13,000 Hamas operatives, a number I believe credible partly because I believe the armed forces of a democratic American ally over a terrorist regime
Ironically, the careful approach Israel has taken may have actually led to more destruction; since the IDF giving warnings and conducting evacuations help Hamas survive, it ultimately prolongs the war and, with it, its devastation.
But all available evidence shows that Israel has followed the laws of war, legal obligations, best practices in civilian harm mitigation
Ahh yes, a wonderfully impartial source, and also a severely outdated one at that.
he IDF estimates it has killed about 13,000 Hamas operatives, a number I believe credible partly because I believe the armed forces of a democratic American ally over a terrorist regime
It is an opinion of expert on urban warfare. That it is laughable to you, in your opinion, is fine.This is an opinion piece with some absolutely laughable lines:
The principle stays the same, even a few months later. I am waiting for your wonderfully impartial source.Ahh yes, a wonderfully impartial source, and also a severely outdated one at that.
Also:
I mean since March, an additional 10,000 Palestinians have been killed, and yes its an absurd source considering the language he uses where he absolves Israel at every given junction and refuses to concede that they could do any wrong. Looking at his previous gems:The principle stays the same, even a few months later. I am waiting for your wonderfully impartial source.
Because you don't like it what it says it should not be taken seriously? That is instant classic.I mean since March, an additional 10,000 Palestinians have been killed, and yes its an absurd source considering the language he uses where he absolves Israel at every given junction and refuses to concede that they could do any wrong. Looking at his previous gems:
Hospitals Are Protected by International Law but They Can't be 'Off Limits'
Stop Comparing Israel's War in Gaza to Anything. It Has No Precedent
Israel Implemented More Measures to Prevent Civilian Casualties Than Any Other Nation in History | Opinion
Clearly not a source to be taken seriously.
As for my sources:
https://www.oxfam.org.uk/media/pres...n-any-other-recent-conflict-in-a-single-year/
https://euromedmonitor.org/en/article/6494/New-report..-De-Gaza:-A-Year-of-Israel’s-Genocide-and-the-Collapse-of-World-Order
https://www.hrw.org/the-day-in-human-rights/2024/10/07#:~:text=Nearly 42,000 Palestinians have been,spreading to Lebanon and beyond.
https://www.independent.co.uk/news/...ar-gaza-numbers-hamas-palestine-b2623961.html
Or am I led to believe all of these organisations have been infiltrated by Hamas?
Richard Falk, Chairman of Board of Trustees of Euro-Med Monitor, is a “9/11 conspiracy theorist” who has been widely denounced, including by the former Secretary-General of the UN, for vile comments blaming the Boston terrorist attack on “the American global domination project” and “Tel Aviv.” He is also the author of an article “Slouching toward a Palestinian Holocaust” that compares Israel to Nazi Germany and has been condemned for publishing an antisemitic cartoon on his blog.
The IOF doesn't have any right to go after anyone in Gaza or Lebanon in any case.Even by the IDFs numbers of Hamas people killed in Gaza the ratio of civilians to combatants is around the same to Oct 7. So IDF and Hamas are no different at protecting civilians?
So If I were you I would rethink what my sources are. And what should be taken seriously.
Please, continue to live in a bubble.Luckily most of us worked that out a while ago.
Thank you for pointing that out. If that's what he indeed believes then I shan't be using his sources again. The others seem pretty reliable however.Because you don't like it what it says it should not be taken seriously? That is instant classic.
But you don't even know how right you are about your sources. Can I nitpick just one? For a minor detail.
So If I were you I would rethink what my sources are. And what should be taken seriously.
I think the word "invasion" will be more apt at this point.525600 minutes.
I think the word "invasion" will be more apt at this point.
FancyIt's a special military operation.