Jesus, I'm never going to see past that now. He is the spitting image.
Jesus, I'm never going to see past that now. He is the spitting image.
You kick off if they make eye contact?Obviously just referring to his muscles, calm down.
Ladies often call me a gorilla in the sheets and I don't give them a 3 night ban.
Feck sake, posted that ages ago and no one piped upJesus, I'm never going to see past that now. He is the spitting image.
Easy to forget among the stuff with the wingers that we have a CB who fought with the police
King Kong?Gorillas tend to be assosciated with strength. Unless someone tries incredibly hard to be offended on behalf of black people while being as white as possible, then its possible to be negative about this
Sound of the police, woo woo wooEmojis don't insult people. People insult people. With emojis.
Idiot, no racist intention but just not something to do when all connotations point to the negative.
How is there no racist intention there? It's a shocking post. Post that at work about a black colleague and you will get fired
Something can be racist without racist intention. Often out of ignorance or just not be aware that what is said/written is racist or has racist connotations.How is there no racist intention there? It's a shocking post. Post that at work about a black colleague and you will get fired
I think the issue lies in that it is used to be racist in other contexts. I do think context is important, but also they can't just say it's ok because people can just use the defence "well, I didn't mean it like that". You also end up in the position where the FA is the arbiter of intent.
It's a very difficult one to handle to be honest, because I think it's obvious he didn't mean anything bad by it, but letting him off could have ramifications for racist remarks in the future.
What next? Rashford done for breaking and entering?
Because the emojis were about Onana and Maguire. Plus that specific emoji has a well established meaning which has nothing to do with race and would have been appropriate in this context.
I can see how it would be misinterpreted as racist but it’s fairly obvious that was not the intention. And that’s even if you ignore the fact that’s it clearly aimed at a team mate who he would only be saying positive things about after what happened in the match.
I'd just use two of the default (yellow) ones.
Because the emojis were about Onana and Maguire. Plus that specific emoji has a well established meaning which has nothing to do with race and would have been appropriate in this context.
I can see how it would be misinterpreted as racist but it’s fairly obvious that was not the intention. And that’s even if you ignore the fact that’s it clearly aimed at a team mate who he would only be saying positive things about after what happened in the match.
Your very own source says the following about the emoji: "It can also symbolize wildness, primal instincts, and untamed nature."
You think it is ok to invoke this with regard to a black person?
It's not a good look.
They can't. Common sense is not politically correct.It's ridiculous. The FA need to use their common sense for once.
Yep.What a time to be alive.
How is there no racist intention there? It's a shocking post. Post that at work about a black colleague and you will get fired
In the post you quoted I said I could see how it could be misinterpreted. But I was explaining what the intent was. And the intent is a) fairly clear and b) not racist.
Yep.I always think incidents like this say more about those pointing fingers. They are the ones making the connection between a gorilla and a black man surely?
Exactly. When bananas are thrown at players, why couldn't they be for simple nourishment?why do you assume its about Onana ? There is a bunch of other players as well? Are you yourself an expert on these matters?
I always think incidents like this say more about those pointing fingers. They are the ones making the connection between a gorilla and a black man surely?
That would be chimps but appreciate the effortStop throwing your poo at them then.
It's best avoided to remove all doubt or question. There is already a widespread and prevailing negative understanding of a particular trope or symbol, so why even raise the possibility of giving it air. There were other very easy ways to express the same sentiment without stepping into a potential quagmire. It doesn't need to be some huge deal, but he should do better.
The problem here is that if this particular application is given some sort of informal license or imprimatur by ignoring it, others will surely mimic the same and excuse their line crossing with "I was just talking about his strength like Garnacho". Not exactly the best way to use a platform to promote an anti-racism message and stamp out racism if that is the Prem's objective.
Eventually, we will be in the "I thought he was cramping and needed some extra potassium, so I threw the banana" territory. (this is a joke , btw)
Well FA set a precedent with Cavani didn't they? On getting offended on behalf of others.It isn’t something I’d post myself, simply because I know what people are like. But can we all stop being offended on other peoples behalf for a second, and put this into perspective? It’s really weird to actually think he’d be doing this maliciously.