Edgar Allan Pillow
Ero-Sennin
Ngotha dei, Fishy is poruki no.1 here. Don't mess with him.If you can't stand it, then go feck yourself.
Why should it bother you?
All good sort here, dude. Chill.
Ngotha dei, Fishy is poruki no.1 here. Don't mess with him.If you can't stand it, then go feck yourself.
Why should it bother you?
Hope you and family are safe, Vida!I wasn't able to get back to my house because there was a battle in the surrounding areas between the police and protestors. I got back late at night after being stuck many hours and saw burnt cars and buses, the entire stretch of the main road infront of my colony was full of shattered glass. My colonies main entrance was vandalized and i saw green dtc buses full of crpf being rushed in.
Because some of them might be facing persecution too? There have been quite a few posts explaining the nuance involved in this situation, I'm not sure how you still can't see how it's possible to be a Muslim and still get persecuted by other Muslims.More precisely, those are immigrant Muslims from the nation which is created by diving India based on Islam. Why should illegal Muslim immigrants from the divided part had to be given same priority with persecuted people.
More precisely, those are immigrant Muslims from the nation which is created by diving India based on Islam. Why should illegal Muslim immigrants from the divided part had to be given same priority with persecuted people.
That is unnecessary. Not everyone speaks like you.Ngotha dei, Fishy is poruki no.1 here. Don't mess with him.
All good sort here, dude. Chill.
Because a law against persecution is a good thing. But a law against persecution which excludes Muslims is still good, but biased and bigoted.
Because some of them might be facing persecution too?
Dude, chill. Caf humor!That is unnecessary. Not everyone speaks like you.
Because we are a secular country so we can't explicitly exclude people from any religion. Why is this so hard to understand? Religion cannot be the basis of citizenship in a secular state.More precisely, those are immigrant Muslims from the nation which is created by diving India based on Islam. Why should illegal Muslim immigrants from the divided part had to be given same priority with persecuted people.
Countries like UK, US send back economic illegal migrants. Indians and Pakistanis are sent back few months back as well. India should be no different.
fecksake this is one stupid question.More precisely, those are immigrant Muslims from the nation which is created by diving India based on Islam. Why should illegal Muslim immigrants from the divided part had to be given same priority with persecuted people.
Countries like UK, US send back economic illegal migrants. Indians and Pakistanis are sent back few months back as well. India should be no different.
Well put. There's so many strange arguments doing the rounds borne out of misinformation and misplaced nationalism. I was told today that 'but Muslims have Pakistan, Bangladesh etc which is their home/where they belong'. The Hindu Rashtra dream is in sight for BJP/RSS.Because we are a secular country so we can't explicitly exclude people from any religion. Why is this so hard to understand? Religion cannot be the basis of citizenship in a secular state.
Consider also what the criteria is? Taslima Nasreen wrote Lajja and was hounded out of Bangladesh. Yes she is an atheist but she is prima facie a muslim. She lives today in an uncertain position. As an atheist she doesn't come under the umbrella of minority as the act would consider her a muslim therefore incapable of claiming anything under it. Sri Lankan Tamil Hindus can't claim under it even though they are prime targets. Why? Well we know why. Because the BJP stands to gain nothing from appealing to Tamil Nadu - a state that contributes far more than the likes of Uttar Pradesh but does not vote for the BJP.
The other thing is that India's borders are totally arbitrary and people from the same community live all over. If you have ever traveled in the borderlands in any state you'd know that. Shit, just go to Tirupati: Yes you are in Andhra but you could also be in Tamil Nadu. In many cases the Bangladeshis are really extended family of the Bengalis who are in India.
You have to remember many Pakistanis and Bangladeshis also didn't move out of malice because they couldn't bear living with Hindus. Their family just left because often they had no choice.
Afghanistan is not that different - they have dozens of different ethnicities (all of whom are at odds with each other) - Uzbeks, Tajiks, Hazaras, Pashtuns - they don't get along just because they are muslims. The Panjshiri Tajiks (with whom India have excellent relations) have consistently spoken out against Pakistan's terrorist campaign in India (Just read up about Amrullah Saleh) and they are persecuted in Afghanistan. Now we won't let them come in because they are muslim so therefore they cannot be persecuted? What kind of nonsense is this? Is Erdogan not a muslim? Is he not at odds with many of the Kurds who are also muslim?
hmmmm, do you see a difference between this and allowing people in India based on their religion only?The problem here is, NRC is a long time expectation in NE India. It had to be implemented. Indira Gandhi said at the time of Bangladesh war that all migrants will be sent back irrespective of religion.
Sad to see them descend towards facism. Saw a stat that a third of legislatures have pending criminal cases. Depressing.
Ngotha dei, Fishy is poruki no.1 here. Don't mess with him.
All good sort here, dude. Chill.
''The exremist said: Extreme times call for extreme measures"
"I said: Extreme times comes from extreme measures"
I worry about India. This is how extremism creeps into society from all sides which will have a devastating effect on the country.
Who are they and where is it? Secular crowd or mainly Muslim?
West Bengal. I would say mainly a mix of both.Who are they and where is it? Secular crowd or mainly Muslim?
Somewhere in Bengal I guess, you can see Mamata leading that crowd (in white).Who are they and where is it? Secular crowd or mainly Muslim?
And the new Northern Brexit Loving Tory voters that rebelled against Labour.Unfortunately, faux-nationalism is afflicting the world. These racists and bigots remind me somewhat about the MAGA crowd.
I would think the correct way will be somewhere in the middle.And the new Northern Brexit Loving Tory voters that rebelled against Labour.
I suspect it exists in most nations in the world right now. Globalised Neo Liberalism failed to last the test of time.
Is this authentic ?
Fecksake this is one dumb and stupid answer.fecksake this is one stupid question.
Why not send illegal Christian and Hindu immigrants back too? There may be no difference in their 'perscution' and that of a Muslims after all.
Is this authentic ?
Not even an original retort. As long as there is persecution of both communities the law should not see them as inherently different. Discrimination is discrimination. Unless you wish to look at Hindus and Muslims differently which would say more about you than them.Fecksake this is one dumb and stupid answer.
I agree with others who said that there are some sects/atheists in Muslims as persecuted people. Your answer of no difference between persecution of Hindus/Christians vs Muslims is Pakistan & Bangladesh is plain non sense.
I agree. The persecuted sects in Muslims/atheists should also added to it.Because we are a secular country so we can't explicitly exclude people from any religion. Why is this so hard to understand? Religion cannot be the basis of citizenship in a secular state.
Consider also what the criteria is? Taslima Nasreen wrote Lajja and was hounded out of Bangladesh. Yes she is an atheist but she is prima facie a muslim. She lives today in an uncertain position. As an atheist she doesn't come under the umbrella of minority as the act would consider her a muslim therefore incapable of claiming anything under it. Sri Lankan Tamil Hindus can't claim under it even though they are prime targets. Why? Well we know why. Because the BJP stands to gain nothing from appealing to Tamil Nadu - a state that contributes far more than the likes of Uttar Pradesh but does not vote for the BJP.
The other thing is that India's borders are totally arbitrary and people from the same community live all over. If you have ever traveled in the borderlands in any state you'd know that. Shit, just go to Tirupati: Yes you are in Andhra but you could also be in Tamil Nadu. In many cases the Bangladeshis are really extended family of the Bengalis who are in India.
You have to remember many Pakistanis and Bangladeshis also didn't move out of malice because they couldn't bear living with Hindus. Their family just left because often they had no choice.
Afghanistan is not that different - they have dozens of different ethnicities (all of whom are at odds with each other) - Uzbeks, Tajiks, Hazaras, Pashtuns - they don't get along just because they are muslims. The Panjshiri Tajiks (with whom India have excellent relations) have consistently spoken out against Pakistan's terrorist campaign in India (Just read up about Amrullah Saleh) and they are persecuted in Afghanistan. Now we won't let them come in because they are muslim so therefore they cannot be persecuted? What kind of nonsense is this? Is Erdogan not a muslim? Is he not at odds with many of the Kurds who are also muslim?