On the pitches debate, it's not hard lads.
260 plays 260 isn't ideal. Nor is 100 plays 100.
Anything in-between is pretty good.
I prefer pitches in which both bowlers and batters can compete. The above 200 pitches take bowlers out of the game almost.As long as you get close, competitive games, does it matter?
As long as you get close, competitive games, does it matter?
I prefer pitches in which both bowlers and batters can compete. The above 200 pitches take bowlers out of the game almost.
I think yes - it's need to be somewhat of a battle between bat and ball.
US decent? or Pak being Pak?
Must’ve missed it, unless you’re talking about the David catch? Otherwise which wicket was it? I’ll try and search for itThe catch from the Aussie game earlier was sensational
These are taking the Wasteman competition bit too seriouslyNo fours in the first 10 overs must be some kind of record.
Edit: Spoke too soon ffs
A bit late to the party, but, like, the T20 WC is taking place in the US?
feck off Azam Khan. Absolutely useless fecker.
For a short while. Knock outs and majority of games in the Windies.
Now they'd love 170Pakistan recovered and on for 170 minimum now.
It's fine I think, they'll roll them over for a double digit totalNow they'd love 170
His selection, is it pure nepotism at play, or has he ever been good? Domestic cricket etc.feck off Azam Khan. Absolutely useless fecker.
It's fine I think, they'll roll them over for a double digit total
Platform is set, could get interestingAmerica looking very comfortable so far.
I know his size is an obvious thing to hit him with, but i've watched him v England and today - he looks like he's never batted before.