The Taurean
looks like a chipmunk
England will probably lose the next one to make it even funnier.
Will depend on the toss and the pitch. None of their bowlers are top class, they can contain a side very well while chasing but bowling first, I don’t think they are very threatening.Quite likely that we play England again in the semis..
Not going to be easy.
Treating these average bowlers like they're prime akrams.
Joke. Next match please.
We have been comprehensively outplayed for most of the 100 overs, well done.To all those Indian fans giving it to England over the last few days:
Ridiculous run chase - wonder how much the ECB paid India after that - only explanation for that.
Doesn’t make sense for them to want Pakistan out when England are more dangerous.
Mental stuff.
Good luck in the next few games then! Seeing how pants you were against Pakistan, Sri Lanka and Australia...To all those Indian fans giving it to England over the last few days:
Oh well, never mind.
Getting in to the semis was a long shot last week and for Pak to even get as close as they've done has been a good effort considering we lost 10 ODIs in a row coming in to the World Cup. Take stock of where we failed, ship out Malik and Hafeez, and finally build a middle order for the long=term (Babar and Haris should be the foundation). Shaheen and Hasnain are two very good young pacers but we need a top-class spinning option (Shadab should be a support bowler, a la Hafeez), especially since the next World Cup is in India.
To all those Indian fans giving it to England over the last few days:
We are very reliant on Rohit and Kohli...Will depend on the toss and the pitch. None of their bowlers are top class, they can contain a side very well while chasing but bowling first, I don’t think they are very threatening.
If the target was 300, I think we'd not have chased that either. The mentality isn't there.It’s all wonderful criticizing the chase, but absolute credit must go to the English bowlers. They learned from the first innings and realized taking the speed of the ball was crucial.
It’s not as if India were miles off. The difference in the end was shami’s final spell.
First 10 were just a joke, 3 maidens from woakes ffs and last few overs, I can't explain whether that was good bowling or India not even trying.I don't think any of them are brilliant (Archer could be in a few years but not yet for me) but they've played the conditions well. Certainly better than the Indian bowlers did barring Bumrah.
No but the batting at the end was quite bizarre.The loss is not on Dhoni btw . It's on Kohli and Rohit . You can't leave 180 off 20 overs for your middle order
I’d agree. He was looking so good too.Outside Kohli, Rohit and Hardik India's batting is really average. Losing Dhawan was a big blow.
BJP called Dhoni to make sure of it.Ridiculous run chase - wonder how much the ECB paid India after that - only explanation for that.
Doesn’t make sense for them to want Pakistan out when England are more dangerous.
Mental stuff.
To all those Indian fans giving it to England over the last few days:
Relax. You'll be bending over for a resurgent Aussies in the final as you usually do in any caseDid that feel good?
To all those Indian fans giving it to England over the last few days:
Relax. You'll be bending over for a resurgent Aussies in the final as you usually do in any case
I'm assuming something to do with NRR, other than that it's baffling.I'm actually serious. Can anyone give me an explanation for why we surrendered without a fight? Why did Dhoni and Jadhav not slog? Why were we taking singles? What's the point of keeping 5 wickets in hand and losing without taking risks?
Does wickets in hand help with the NRR?I'm actually serious. Can anyone give me an explanation for why we surrendered without a fight? Why did Dhoni and Jadhav not slog? Why were we taking singles? What's the point of keeping 5 wickets in hand and losing without taking risks?
I'm actually serious. Can anyone give me an explanation for why we surrendered without a fight? Why did Dhoni and Jadhav not slog? Why were we taking singles? What's the point of keeping 5 wickets in hand and losing without taking risks?
Haha.. no chance.Will Kohli and Shastri have the minerals to drop Dhoni?
Great to see Plunkett back.
Very important bowler for us. Always takes wickets.
This. Yadav offers nothing.Would still play Pant over Shankar. He’s looked nervous today and is understandable why, but game against SL and BAN should be a lot easier for him with less pressure to perform. Also wouldn’t mind Yadav being replaced by Jadeja or Bhuvi. But most probably it will be back to Shankar the next match
To all those Indian fans giving it to England over the last few days:
Dhoni should come in at 4, provided he can run and take those singles. Flog Jadhav and Shankar for Pant and one of Jadeja/ Bhuvi. That should level things up a bitWe are very reliant on Rohit and Kohli...
Same ground for the semis too.. England will be confident of chasing down a big total on this pitch... They actually have some power hitters at 6 and 7 and not Dhoni and Jadhav.
10 overs and 27 is stupid. Rohit and Kohli are world class players but their approach was stupid.
First 10 were just a joke, 3 maidens from woakes ffs and last few overs, I can't explain whether that was good bowling or India not even trying.
Agree about Archer.
Relax. You'll be bending over for a resurgent Aussies in the final as you usually do in any case
I'm actually serious. Can anyone give me an explanation for why we surrendered without a fight? Why did Dhoni and Jadhav not slog? Why were we taking singles? What's the point of keeping 5 wickets in hand and losing without taking risks?
To all those Indian fans giving it to England over the last few days: