londonredmaniac
I suffer delusions of grandeur
Great result.
Anyone else thing he might have been a fix?
It was amazing. Started out in the library just me and another lad watching it on the computer. O'Brien went on the rampage and more people started trickling over. Someone brought cans. A library person came over to shut us up. We gave him a can and he started watching. A more senior library person kicked us all out, and severely admonished the other library guy. We charged over to the pub across the road. We made them turn over from Downpatrick racing. Got the beers in, and proceeded to go fecking bananas. Cricket.
EDIT: Damn you noodle, stole my finisher.
fecking hell, Sidhu must love the sound of his own voice.
Simon Doull should get an award for being the only person to like him, ever. He was actually jotting down his Sidhuisms.The coverage's top class, but Sidhu's single handedly bringing it down to the level of Neo Sports, etc. What an annoying twat.
Should I feel silly for not getting this?How is Beanotown these days?
Probably quite good - English cricket players become world class when they are injured and not playing in defeats!
If I were an Irish fan, I guess I'd be feeling as close to what we all felt like in the moments after the final whistle on 26th May 1999.
AM not in England right now. Whats the reaction on the streets and on the radio's? Are the Irish expats taking the piss??? Are the English ashamed and belittled?
Still cant get my head around what we saw this evening. If I were an Irish fan, I guess I'd be feeling as close to what we all felt like in the moments after the final whistle on 26th May 1999.
.
Not exactly no. 90% of the country will not know about until they read the morning papers.
I only heard about it on the train on the way home from work
Just how do you begin to make sense of what happened under lights at the Chinnaswamy Stadium on Wednesday? The cricket World Cup has seen upsets before. Zimbabwe beat Australia in 1983, and Ireland first came to prominence with that thrilling triumph over Pakistan four years ago. But Australia in '83 were a team in decline and the Pakistanis were a shambles. England, as they showed on Sunday night against India, are an upwardly mobile force.
You can look to other sports and still not find an answer. Argentina lost to Cameroon in the opening game of Italia '90, while the French slipped on a banana skin against Senegal 12 years later. But the French, with Zinedine Zidane injured, had played one tournament too many as a group, while the Argentines had always been mercurial and prone to implosion.
Comparisons with Ireland's Italia '90 adventure aren't accurate either. They may have been unfancied quarter-finalists but the man who scored against England, Kevin Sheedy, was a household name, a legend of the great Everton sides of the 1980s. Rugby comparisons fail too, because Brian O'Driscoll, who led them to a first Grand Slam in 61 years in 2010, has long been recognised as one of the game's greats.
So, where do we slot Kevin O'Brien and this innings for the ages? The only comparison that makes sense to me is with another team that played in green 42 years ago. The New York Jets were huge underdogs going into Super Bowl III against Johnny Unitas and the Baltimore Colts, but Joe Namath played the game of his life to upset the odds.
The Jets were part of the much-derided American Football League, the new kids on the block. Against the might of the National Football League, they weren't given a chance. Their win paved the way for parity, for a level playing field.
The O'Brien family has some previous when it comes to such heroics. Let's not forget that it was Niall's classy 72 that provided the ballast for the tricky run-chase against Pakistan. A game earlier, Kevin's sturdy medium-pace produced a wicket-maiden when Zimbabwe needed just nine to win from 12 balls. They would only tie.
How wonderful it would be if this triumph could do for Irish cricket what the Jets did for the AFL. Ireland have proudly carried the associates' standard for two World Cups in succession. They're not asking for free lunches, just for a fair chance.
"The ICC have made the decision to reduce it [the next World Cup] to 10 teams and that's pretty disappointing," said William Porterfield afterwards, managing to look serious even with purple hair. "We will have to wait and see what happens in April when they decide if there will be a qualifying tournament. If we don't get in, it could be the death knell for associate teams."
As special as Ireland's three results in 2007 were, this easily eclipses them. Zimbabwe were there for the taking, while Pakistan scripted their demise with shots of staggering stupidity. Bangladesh just couldn't cope with a fast and bouncy pitch in Barbados
The elitists' argument has as many legs as Long John Silver did. A cosy clique works for those within, but it alienates everyone else, and destroys their chances of development. Sri Lanka won just two of their first 15 World Cup matches. Had the ICC lost patience after they lost every game in 1987, there would have been no Cinderella story in 1996.
Of course, Sri Lanka had a thriving school system to produce talent, and fine coaches. The likes of Ireland and Netherlands don't, yet, and they never will if young kids are denied the chance to dream of being the next O'Brien or ten Doeschate on the world stage.
This was my 25th World Cup game, and half a dozen of them have featured Ireland. No one who was there will ever forget St. Patrick's Day in 2007, Cotton Eye Joe blaring from the speakers and throats increasingly lubricated by Red Stripe singing The Fields of Athenry and Molly Malone. Those were I-was-there moments I'll treasure all my life, and the World Cup would be immeasurably poorer without them.
Having watched Ireland play and also in training, and talked to the likes of Trent Johnston and Boyd Rankin, it's not hard to guess why they so consistently punch above their weight. If you could bottle the spirit within the camp, it would sell as well as Guinness or Bushmills. They're a tight unit, and take such joy in each other's successes. Against a team of prima donnas or those that feel success is their entitlement, they will always have a chance.
As special as the three results in 2007 were, this easily eclipses them. Zimbabwe were there for the taking, while Pakistan scripted their demise with shots of staggering stupidity. Bangladesh just couldn't cope with a fast and bouncy pitch in Barbados.
Here, England made 327. Against Bangladesh in Mirpur, Ireland had needed just 55 from 81 balls with five wickets in hand when O'Brien Junior was dismissed. They feel apart. Here, Alex Cusack was run out when 55 were required with just 51 balls remaining. This time, there was no disintegration.
The previous highest World Cup score by a "minnow" batting second was Sri Lanka's 276 for 4 in the inaugural World Cup. That day at Lord's, Australia had made one more than England did at the Chinnaswamy. When the Powerplay was taken, Ireland needed 161 from 114 balls. Associate teams just don't do that against full-strength opposition. Neither do batsmen who play in the Leinster League after county contracts have been terminated make 50-ball centuries on the biggest stage.
Till now. This is the wake-up call that cricket needs. Embrace, don't alienate. Nurture, don't destroy. Take the Ghanas out of the football and the Irelands out of the cricket, and what we're left with would be a much poorer spectacle.
If managed properly, this win should act as the defining catalyst for Irish cricket to take the quantum leap into the next stage of their cricketing development.
You don't half spout some shite on here.
Have you ever even been to Ireland ?
The vast majority of cnuts over here would have no interest whatsoever in what is deemed as 'an English sport'. They'll enjoy 'getting one over the English' absolutely but 'defining catalyst for Irish cricket to take the quantum leap into the next stage of their cricketing development' is hyperbolic twaddle that is symptomatic of so many of your posts.
what's the point of the cricket worldcup
wouldn't it be better served with a 'cricket 8s' or something where they just get the competitive nations together?
having a team of 'canadians' (really Ausssie/english players with a tenuous tie to Canada who can't make their national squads) play in the world cup and getting trounced for 3 games does nothing for their development
Same for rugby
do we need to see NZ smash Japan 100+ - 0?
i just posted in the cricket forum. I never thought i would do that.
David cameron, prince harry, ian botham, gary lineker, noel edmonds, fabio capello
your boys took a hell of a beating!!!!
I'm quite glad England lost at the Cricket....
...cos Cricket's quite shit init?
You know you like it.Cricket
I am not a fan of cricket, but that match was absolutely outstanding. I could never get into that test cricket shite, but the ODIs can obviously be great.
If I had of known Ireland were 399 to 1 to win at one stage, I probably would have put a couple of quid on them. Balls.
Don't flatter yourself, address the post.
You've never been to Ireland have you ? You have no idea of Irish culture have you ?
You are spouting shite and I'm pulling you up on it.
I couldn't give a toss who you are.
EDIT: Damn you noodle, stole my finisher.
I was invited to meet the Taoisigh and enjoyed a fantatsic dinner with him at the Farmleigh estate.
Good stuff. Cricket's a great game. Particularly test cricket.
Congrats to you and your Irish brethren. Should you guys give a monkeys about it all, of course.
Of course you were. The word you are looking for is Taoiseach. Taoisigh is the plural.
Look, I really don't give a toss about you and I care even less what some stuck up ex public schoolboy on an internet forum thinks of me, but when you come out with shite like 'if managed properly, this win should act as the defining catalyst for Irish cricket to take the quantum leap into the next stage of their cricketing development' I'm going to have a little laugh at you. OK ?