Judas
Open to offers
Selling Rojo for 25mil good luck.
Basically all those prices are unrealistic/wrong.
Basically all those prices are unrealistic/wrong.
This is really semantics, but that is just not correct.
If I have a Snickers-bar and I want 200 USD for it; that does not constitute market value.
If some idiot decides to pay it; that does.
Its the agreement in an open market place that decides value.
“Hi Aiyawatt, despite our deep pockets we're not prepared to meet your £85m valuation but we can offer you £70m AND a player we don’t want, who by our own admission is useless, and probably won’t even replace the player you don’t want to sell”
Man City tried to do this to us in January 2018 with Mahrez. Vichai refused to be bullied and his son will do the same.
There it is again.
Why not to offer them 70m+Darmian, maybe they will accept. He is not on very high wages and of absolutely no use for us, but at Leicester maybe he will play
There it is again.
If we do the following:
Buy
Maguire: 70M
Bruno: 40M
Sell
Rojo: 25M
Lukaku: 90M
That's a 5M profit. Should be a no-brainer for Edward.
It's hilarious isn't it. Making bid for players is bullying now.
Ok, then why not 130 for De Ligt?
There it is again.
Hallelujah, exactly this!don't think that was his point. I don't think Bailly injury changes anything as he's so far down the list of who Ole would choose at CH. Fighting with Rojo (and we don't want him either).
For me, it's simple - we pay the price or we don't (and other factors won't change our or Leicesters view)
Value is not determined by the supplier.Unfortunately that’s not how it works, he’s worth however much Leicester says he is. How valuable he is to their squad. People don’t seem to understand this.
You are confusing price and value.His value is whatever the minimum amount Leicester will accept for him. Plain and simple. Now the question is what do Manchester United value more - the £80 odd million that LC are asking for or having the player on our team.
Value is not determined by the supplier.
The term bullying is probably inappropriate. The situation is that Manchester United is a behmoth of a club. A club that for years had consistent success. It may be rude to say so, but to a degree, you still operate as if this is the case, and the reason this seems reasonable is because, as I said the Manchester United is a massive, massive club, a colossal brand.
This, coupled with your riches, makes you an appealing propspect to most players (At least those who do not insist of playing in the Champions League).
Now, the reason the term bullying is used, probably because a better term escapes me, is that when such a club say "We are interested in player X", there is almost inevitably some level of interest from the player (No surprise).
So, when the players club says X millions as the required amount, yet Utd won`t pay it, but still continue to admit pursuit, make such statements as "We won't overpay", " We have patience", then there is no other conclusion to draw than Utd is just waiting for the player to kick up a fuss and push for the move, at a value below the owning clubs valuiation. (This is just "throwing your weight" around maybe?)
Anyone's opinion that says Harry's asking price it to high, is a fool. It is not anyone's place to set the price except the seller.
(Economics 101)
Have a good day all!
He is better than what we have, so agree we should pay the money, not sure about the mushroom thing though..Maguire isn't a fungible commodity.
Statistically, he's the best defender in the all of Europe if you take a combination of heading and passing metrics.
Given our weakness at setpieces and our tactic to play out of the back with pacy forwards up front, Maguire is perfect to be an aerial presence who's also able to launch quick counters.
Since Leicester have a contract with the player, the price they quote is precisely what he's worth. And the price they're quoting is intrinsically linked to how much money they already have in the bank.
Last season, the bottom placed PL team earned £100m in TV revenue alone. The English game is ridiculously rich and getting richer. The bumper TV contract isn't going away anytime soon. With that in mind, Maguire was on sale for £70m in 2018 and £80m in 2019.
If we leave it another year, he won't be getting cheaper. He's the ideal player for Ole and this is as low as his price will be whilst he's still in his prime.
Price is, value isn't.This is true, except if you are operating in a sellers market of course.
The term bullying is probably inappropriate. The situation is that Manchester United is a behmoth of a club. A club that for years had consistent success. It may be rude to say so, but to a degree, you still operate as if this is the case, and the reason this seems reasonable is because, as I said the Manchester United is a massive, massive club, a colossal brand.
This, coupled with your riches, makes you an appealing propspect to most players (At least those who do not insist of playing in the Champions League).
Now, the reason the term bullying is used, probably because a better term escapes me, is that when such a club say "We are interested in player X", there is almost inevitably some level of interest from the player (No surprise).
So, when the players club says X millions as the required amount, yet Utd won`t pay it, but still continue to admit pursuit, make such statements as "We won't overpay", " We have patience", then there is no other conclusion to draw than Utd is just waiting for the player to kick up a fuss and push for the move, at a value below the owning clubs valuiation. (This is just "throwing your weight" around maybe?)
Anyone's opinion that says Harry's asking price it to high, is a fool. It is not anyone's place to set the price except the seller.
(Economics 101)
Have a good day all!
Price is, value isn't.
While I agree with much of your post in general, I dont see any club making money of Maguire commercially....
Could be worse, we could take the approach of certain Spanish clubs and get all of our English players to talk about how great it would be for their international colleague to play for their team and effectively publicly tap him up for about 12 months before we ever make a bid for him.This whole bullying thing is getting super tedious.
We've offered 70m.
We've not stormed in with some bailiffs and said we're having him for free cos we is Manchester United.
I think you're slightly misunderstanding this. Its a win-win because LC gets something they value more than the player - say 80 mill odd - and Manchester United value the player more than the 80 million. Man United don't pay less than they think he's valued. They value Maguire more than what Leicester values him. That is why trade brings peace and prosperity. But you're right in your initial point that the two clubs will value the players differently or there's no incentive to trade in the first place. But this model is also ignoring that the commodity being traded - the player - also has preferences.
Tedious isn't it.
It's hilarious isn't it. Making bid for players is bullying now.
The term bullying is probably inappropriate. The situation is that Manchester United is a behmoth of a club. A club that for years had consistent success. It may be rude to say so, but to a degree, you still operate as if this is the case, and the reason this seems reasonable is because, as I said the Manchester United is a massive, massive club, a colossal brand.
This, coupled with your riches, makes you an appealing propspect to most players (At least those who do not insist of playing in the Champions League).
Now, the reason the term bullying is used, probably because a better term escapes me, is that when such a club say "We are interested in player X", there is almost inevitably some level of interest from the player (No surprise).
So, when the players club says X millions as the required amount, yet Utd won`t pay it, but still continue to admit pursuit, make such statements as "We won't overpay", " We have patience", then there is no other conclusion to draw than Utd is just waiting for the player to kick up a fuss and push for the move, at a value below the owning clubs valuiation. (This is just "throwing your weight" around maybe?)
Anyone's opinion that says Harry's asking price it to high, is a fool. It is not anyone's place to set the price except the seller.
(Economics 101)
Have a good day all!
Sky are only marginally better than Seanfrom Bellenderby, they both make crap up for clicks.
Okay, I got a semi after reading that.
You are using the word value incorrectly. Price is not a monetary value at all, not even close.Price is a monetary value, in this case decided by the seller (Leicester). value is an opinion assigned by a given individual (Fans) or party (Utd), as such it is meaningless to anyone other than individual/party declaring it.
They've already got 2 decent full backs, so o highly doubt they'd want Darmian. They might take Jones though.Why not to offer them 70m+Darmian, maybe they will accept. He is not on very high wages and of absolutely no use for us, but at Leicester maybe he will play
Nononononono. ‘Ten for that, you must be mad!’
You’ve got to haggle.
The term bullying is probably inappropriate. The situation is that Manchester United is a behmoth of a club. A club that for years had consistent success. It may be rude to say so, but to a degree, you still operate as if this is the case, and the reason this seems reasonable is because, as I said the Manchester United is a massive, massive club, a colossal brand.
This, coupled with your riches, makes you an appealing propspect to most players (At least those who do not insist of playing in the Champions League).
Now, the reason the term bullying is used, probably because a better term escapes me, is that when such a club say "We are interested in player X", there is almost inevitably some level of interest from the player (No surprise).
So, when the players club says X millions as the required amount, yet Utd won`t pay it, but still continue to admit pursuit, make such statements as "We won't overpay", " We have patience", then there is no other conclusion to draw than Utd is just waiting for the player to kick up a fuss and push for the move, at a value below the owning clubs valuiation. (This is just "throwing your weight" around maybe?)
Anyone's opinion that says Harry's asking price it to high, is a fool. It is not anyone's place to set the price except the seller.
(Economics 101)
Have a good day all!