Agenda? They are better at the moment than Maguire who is losing us games. There is no agenda just pure common senseWhen they were partners De Gea had to make more saves than any keeper in the league and won player of the month. But that doesn't fit the agenda so people pretend Lindelof was better
Defenders always should be analysed in the pairs they play in.
Maguire and Varane does not work.
Lindelof is the best partner for each defender.
Defenders always should be analysed in the pairs they play in.
Maguire and Varane does not work.
Lindelof is the best partner for each defender.
You have unhealthy obsession with Maguire. Is he your husband or what ? Playing decent in this game does not absolve all of the shit performance he served us beforeI don't have an agenda. I'm calling out the people who obviously do
hahadidn’t feck up tonight, so that’s a positive. I guess.
Remind us all.Harry Maguire Match Statistics (whoscored.com)
Victor Lindelöf Match Statistics (whoscored.com)
The unbiased stats have Maguire as a 7.86 tonight and Lindelof a 6.78. But that doesn't fit the agenda...
When he kicked the ball out for a throw in rather than protect it for a goal kick sums it up for me. Zero confidence at the moment. Someone needs to think long and hard about the choice of captain as well. You can't have the biggest choker as your captain, but hopefully he regains his confidence before a change has to be made.
Think that Rangnick pinpointed what was Maguire's issue. He said that he has to change his way of playing.
Being more proactive meaning he needs to get out more, anticipate more. We see him, more than Varane or Lindelof, trying to intercept the ball near his midfielders and to me, he's just average at that. It's always a 50/50 situation and when he loses the duel, we are massively exposed.
With Rangnick or Ten Hag, he will struggle in the future but with Pochettino, think he will recover his defensive stability, since Pochettino plays more as a middle low block when he didnt have the ball.
Anyway, yesterday he was fine, let's see against Leeds or more so against Atletico. He needs to rise his level.
I say agenda because you obviously have one. When you look for the bad you will find it. When you aren't being biased and look at the facts you will see just how wrong you are just like I posted above. But the stats don't fit your agenda so you ignore them
That's my take on it as well. The first half we played super deep meaning Brighton found it hard to break us down so our defenders weren't put in a position of any real pressure.It looked to me as we set up to protect Maguire. Shaw was tucked in and McFred were shielding the defence and we sat deep pretty much all game. I can't think of another reason to set up like that against Brighton at Old Trafford, other than to protect captain Maguire and make sure he doesn't get isolated. That's probably why he didn't have an horrific game.
Harry Maguire Match Statistics (whoscored.com)
Victor Lindelöf Match Statistics (whoscored.com)
The unbiased stats have Maguire as a 7.86 tonight and Lindelof a 6.78. But that doesn't fit the agenda...
Agenda? They are better at the moment than Maguire who is losing us games. There is no agenda just pure common sense
Let me shed some light here, I'm an advocate of statistics but don't be fooled into thinking that you can't tell any story with statistics, we have to understand the makeup of those numbers and what it's actually trying to tell us, forgive me if you already know this but:
1) There is a definition for every metric that unfortunately chastises better play some time for example, 1 clearance (in the background) will be worth X points in terms of the weighting for the average rating, if another player instead of booting it into row z (Clearing) had simply passed that ball then 1 accurate pass will be lower than the X points for the clearance.
2) If you look at Maguire's stats he has 5 clearances and 4 interceptions but typically it was Lindelof that pressured the defender and Maguire intercepted the loose ball, my Nan should have been competent to make those "Interceptions".
3) There were several instances where Maguire hit the ball out (Clearance), whereas Lindelof turned and passed the ball out but as pointed out in my first point, it won't weight this as highly.
Then you have to take into account their roles, Lindelof does (and is expected to) pressure/ press more where Harry will sit behind slightly due to lack of pace so Lindelof will look better here and in actual fact, it's based on instructions and style of play.
All we can say is due to their flawed definitions, Maguire came out as higher when every rating site done by eyes and not statistics says the opposite. Statistics are good for comparing two players specific actions but even then there is usually reasons behind this and it's not as simple as to just take the figure.
For context, I don't think Maguire had a bad game yesterday and there wasn't much between the two for me, I do think though that Maguire is too quick to just get rid of the ball (Probably due to his confidence based off his recent very poor form) whereas Lindelof does have a bit more about him. I hope Maguire can get back to the days where against smaller teams he would push up into midfield when we control the ball and get's into the box but yesterday he was just average and on the day, that was OK as he did his job.
No, I said in the grand scheme of things statistics don't erase what you can see with your own eyes, there's a reason everyone's been down on him for a while now. Statistics are great to have but they have to backup what you actually see, like I said, if statistics say he had a 95% tackling average and he made a shit tonne of interceptions and blocks, but he had 2 calamitous errors that lead to goals against us, as an example, then what the hell do those statistics matter for, irrelevant. If anyone has an agenda here it's you, some kind of agenda to protect Harry from any and all criticism, you should honestly spend some time away from the forum thinking about anything other than Harry Maguire and how to protect him from those mean internet posters
Remind us all.
Whats the statistic for positioning?
Maguire is forced to act as a result of every team targeting him because they are aware of how rubbish he is.
The fact that he is positionally poor and has to tackle rather than intercept or even stop the attack by positioning (same issue with AWB) does not mean he is a better defender.
The fact that HM is prone to make 1 to 5 huge mistakes every game and opposition chose to target him so he has to tackle more often, doesn't make him better.
EVEN if he is simply better at tackling or heading - he is still a rubbish defender because he spoon feeds the opposition strikers with chances.
You have unhealthy obsession with Maguire. Is he your husband or what ? Playing decent in this game does not absolve all of the shit performance he served us before
That is a pictorial version of the debate people are trying to muster between Lindelof & fecking Maguire. I could care less who’s worse as neither is good enough.
That is a pictorial version of the debate people are trying to muster between Lindelof & fecking Maguire. I could care less who’s worse as neither is good enough.
Anyone who actually watches the games & wants to form more excuses for that guy is a lost cause. We paid £80mil & gave the captaincy to a guy who is ‘not as bad as. . .’, ridiculous.
You tell alot of people they have an agenda…Meanwhile the stats say Maguire had 4 interceptions yesterday. But go on...tell me again how you don't have an agenda
You tell alot of people they have an agenda…
Maybe we just step back (me too!), realise its football we are talking about, and that we have different opinions in regards to who is good and who is not and thats that!
summary:
you think maguire is good, i dont.
I think lindelof is good, you dont.
Easy!
You are making assumptions. I don't think Lindelof is bad. I just don't think he's anywhere near as good as maguire. Maguire had a poor run after being rushed back from injury, but he's been good ever since and is nothing more than a scapegoat for many of our supporters. If he was as bad as everyone makes him out to be, his stats and ratings on whoscored would reflect it (like they did when he was really poor). But he's been good for a while now. Imagine how good he could possibly be if his own fans were actually cheering for him instead of booing and calling him a CeeUNextTuesday
Honestly i don't think the players respect him as a captain. I watch him defend and he's just so bad. He tends to rush into challenges because he's so scared of the space behind . He also tends to wrestle players to the ground alot because he knows it's game over if he gets turned and forced into a foot race. How can a defender who is so shaky and mistake prone be the captain?
The leader of the players on the pitch who's supposed to lead the team to big trophies? He'll get embarrassed by any forward with a decent amount of agility. I'm actually nervous for next week's game vs Atletico because they have quick tricky players like Lemar and Correa. I honestly think our defense would be much more solid with any combination of Varane, Bailly and Lindelof, defenders who can actually move around the pitch with pace. Andy Cole was right in saying he wouldn't start if he wasn't Captain, we're never playing a high line or front foot pressing football with such a slow CB. We'd get torn to shreds.
And both are in fact spineless utter tosh and should be 4/5th choice CBs but rather sold.summary:
you think maguire is good, i dont.
I think lindelof is good, you dont.
Easy!
haha, didn't see that one coming. But in hind site I should have. Your comment is to black and white, the world is more of a murky grey!And both are in fact spineless utter tosh and should be 4/5th choice CBs but rather sold.
Super easy!