2mufc0
Everything is fair game in capitalism!
- Joined
- Jan 8, 2014
- Messages
- 18,647
- Supports
- Dragon of Dojima
Absolute bollocks.
Absolute bollocks.
Would ruin our high energy direct pacey attack. Do not want.
What high energy attack? We have martial in our attack, whos the poler opposite of high energy.Would ruin our high energy direct pacey attack. Do not want.
We have a dynamic attack, if we bring him in everything will have to go through him, like Ronaldo, our team isn't setup for that. Plus he's 30.What high energy attack? We have martial in our attack, whos the poler opposite of high energy.
Kane would be a fantastic signing at the right price, but levy will price him out of a domestic move.
We have a dynamic attack, if we bring him in everything will have to go through him, like Ronaldo, our team isn't setup for that. Plus he's 30.
If we buy him in the summer window he will be 30.He's 29. Why do people always increase the age of players they don't want?
If we buy him in the summer window he will be 30.
Needs a move.
It actually reminds me of when Torres was at Atletico Madrid. Trouble is he moved when he was 23.
He certainly won't be signing a new deal so I'm intrigued how Spurs handle that.
He's 29. Why do people always increase the age of players they don't want?
We have a dynamic attack, if we bring him in everything will have to go through him, like Ronaldo, our team isn't setup for that. Plus he's 30.
Why do you rule that out?
Life moves fast in football, as he found out when City wouldn't push harder for him, then went for Haaland.
Unless he's available for a reasonable fee, we should stay well clear, and given another year there's no guarantee anyone bigger than Tottenham even wants him.
I still find it mad that when a player hits 30 they are instantly out in the discard pile by fans.
Lewandowski is 4 years older and still one of the best strikers on the planet. There’s no reason Kane can’t be in that same bracket for the next 4 years.
Isn't Lewandowski in literally perfect physical condition while Kane has had a number of ankle injuries over the years?
Difference of opinion, i think he'd be fantastic. Plus his ability to drop deep and pass into the channels would make him useful for rashford and antony.We have a dynamic attack, if we bring him in everything will have to go through him, like Ronaldo, our team isn't setup for that. Plus he's 30.
It's not like Ronaldo AT ALL
With Ronaldo he had to be on the end of everything, Kane is the exact opposite of that. He'll be the focal point of the attack feeding the balls through to Rashford, Bruno and Antony
Yeah. It's strange to compare Kane to Ronaldo. Kane is the closest player to Benzema (post Ronaldo) and arguably the better finisher. Benzema had been amazing until last season (34 y.o.). I can see Kane fares well until about that age.
Jurgen Taiga Klopp
I still find it mad that when a player hits 30 they are instantly out in the discard pile by fans.
Lewandowski is 4 years older and still one of the best strikers on the planet. There’s no reason Kane can’t be in that same bracket for the next 4 years.
His general play is top class.Still a great finisher but he has a lot of mileage on the clock, and you can see that in his general play
He makes the finish look easy. There is a difference.The sky commentary team really do fish over the simplest of finishes when it’s Kane. Likewise he always avoids their wrath for being a serial cheat.