He'd cost crazy money 250 million, wouldn't take a penny less if I was Spurs.If Florentino continues his routine of signing the World Cup star, he should be talking to Kane's agent.
Exactly. 5 goals in 2 games.Messi couldn’t score a pen the other day though could he? Still have to stick them in. Nothing wrong with having a Lucky striker.
Didn’t Ronaldo score a pen and get a lucky goal against Spain for his hat-trick?
We have a great striker on form, couldn’t care less how the goals go in.
He really does need to pick up his form in open play. He's too much of a passenger and it could be exposed against the better sides.
Kane has been a passenger and Lingard has been far better.
Are you serious?
Kane's goals were the difference between England and Tunisia.
What's so funny? He's static against fecking Tunisia and Panama.Haha - this must be a joke. Just had to check this was the Kane thread!
That's what I just said in the match threadIf Florentino continues his routine of signing the World Cup star, he should be talking to Kane's agent.
What's so funny? He's static against fecking Tunisia and Panama.
He can't match the movement of Lingard and Sterling and sort of drifts and does the basics for those around him.
Had he a shot from open play today?
He can't just continue to watch others move around him.
You're over sensitive.No one matches the movement of Lingard, and besides they play in different positions.
Just so strange you are criticising a guy who has more goals than anyone else in the WC, and who scored 40+ goals last season.
Maybe we would be better off with a striker who doesn’t score and runs around a bit more.
What's so funny? He's static against fecking Tunisia and Panama.
He can't match the movement of Lingard and Sterling and sort of drifts and does the basics for those around him.
Had he a shot from open play today?
He can't just continue to watch others move around him.
So being able to get into goal scoring positions is just moving around a bit?I think Sterling has been far worse than Kane, he can move around as much as he wants, his finishing has been woeful. Kane should of had an assist tbf, but Sterling somehow managed to work out a way to miss from about 3ft out. Kane otoh has been clinical, his finishing is better than Sterling even when he's not even attempting to score
I can see it now, 'Well Harry I just dont think you move around enough when playing that's why you are getting benched, maybe throw in some step overs and a hocus pokus into a rabona goal as well as moving around more? That would appease the posters on the red cafe forums more."
His movement is fine in general though so its not as if something he doesnt have. Could be a case of just playing within himself today as the game was dead and buried very early and he'd already got goals too. Wouldn't read too much into it.So being able to get into goal scoring positions is just moving around a bit?
You're playing around him at times ffs!
So being able to get into goal scoring positions is just moving around a bit?
You're playing around him at times ffs!
5 goals in 2 matches and some are critical of him? Bloody hell really?
His movement has been brilliant. Look at his first two goals of the tournament. He drifts into space and picks up the second ball, that's why he scored and why England are through to the next round comfortably.
The first goal vs Tunisia was just right place at right time. It was a tremendous save from Stones' header so harsh on the keeper to still concede
I thought his overall play was good.
Funniest hat-trick ever though![]()
So being able to get into goal scoring positions is just moving around a bit?
You're playing around him at times ffs!
Go get that golden boot, son.
I didn't even realise he didn't have a shot from open play.If he can go through an entire game without taking a shot on goal (minus the penalties which he took brilliantly) and end up with a hattrick to his name, I'd suggest his chances of winning the golden boot are rather high.
Same, should of probably had an assist, not sure how Sterling managed to conjure up that miss from right in front 3ft out. Pretty sure it was Kane that headed back across the face of goal.
5 goals in two games at the world cup, whats his record like for the national team? Im assuming it's ok because he still has the job. Guess you could bench Kane and play Rashford - Sterling combo up top, Or Vardy - Rashford. Im just not sure the team would have that clinical edge that Kane's finishing brings. Might be a bit more dynamic as far as interplay and movement in and around the box are concerned however, but you need to put the ball into the back of the net to win games.
2 pens and a goal he had no idea about.. Pens were great, but what a way to get a hattrick.. top scorer with 1 good goal.
Oh sure. Anyone would take them, no matter how they come..Doesn't matter much for me. Still goals anyway.
Oh sure. Anyone would take them, no matter how they come..
But if we are discussing performances, stats can be misleading.
Saying he has scored 5 goals in the WC in 2 games sounds incredibly impressive.. The performances havent been as great as the stats would suggest.
Oh sure. Anyone would take them, no matter how they come..
But if we are discussing performances, stats can be misleading.
Saying he has scored 5 goals in the WC in 2 games sounds incredibly impressive.. The performances havent been as great as the stats would suggest.