Oscie
New Member
- Joined
- Nov 28, 2016
- Messages
- 3,680
But if it's true that the more people see of Corbyn the more they like him, the approach of "if she's not doing the debate, I'm not doing the debate" is surely bonkers?
Who keeps thinking putting Diane Abbott on TV is a good idea?
Well I read a recent list of health care ratings around the world and france was not as high on the list as people like Paul would have you believe but was way ahead of the UK that was 30th on the list. If they do move to something more nhs like then I imagine it will be funded and managed better, I imagine income tax rates are also higher in france than the uk allowing better funding.Presumably that will be why from next year or the year after France is changing to a system which is more like the NHS, where people won't have to pay up front to see a doctor?
Drivel it may be but you pay feck all income tax in the uk and have the worst services I've come across in western Europe. That's not just coincidence.True enough. Everytime I read your drivel I feel like I should be being paid to do so.
Hopefully your right.Even if labour lose this election I am confident that the future of left wing politics is secure and I predict a labour government in the election after this one.
Hopefully your right.
This was pretty much the main idea of Corbyn-ism(such a pointless word) to build back up some very basic left wing ideas and to try and challenge the argument. Now the higher polling a Corbyn lead Labour Party can get the stronger the future of left wing politics will.
Also another potentially positive could be that if the more Labour friendly polling is correct then the centrist/centre left of the PLP will just have to feck off and form other party.
Hopefully your right.
This was pretty much the main idea of Corbyn-ism(such a pointless word) to build back up some very basic left wing ideas and to try and challenge the argument. Now the higher polling a Corbyn lead Labour Party can get the stronger the future of left wing politics will.
Also another potentially positive could be that if the more Labour friendly polling is correct then the centrist/centre left of the PLP will just have to feck off and form other party.
That'd be a disaster. Would guarantee Tory government for a long, long time to come.
Wow, I just assumed they weren't going to be there. Guardian says Corbyn will only go if May does. Interesting if they send McDonnell.Didn't know she'd pulled out of the televised leader debate. Being replaced by Amber fecking Rudd..
https://www.theguardian.com/politic...n-for-theresa-may-in-televised-leaders-debate
It will be interesting to see who will take over after Corbyn, at the moment I can't see many standout candidate. But overall the two most important points for me areOr if they are more smart and mature the next leader will be a more pragmatic corbynist I.e. Left wing but no IRA links, says nothing that would raise any security fears and by that time any brexit issues will be non existent.
Why ?That'd be a disaster. Would guarantee Tory government for a long, long time to come.
Doesn't look uniform across all polls, YouGov has the Tories ahead of Labour by 5 and ComRes has them only 5 off the SNP () Could do with a Panelbase of Scotland soon.Subsample, but has SNP 46%, Labour 26% and Tories down to 22% up here...
https://www.reddit.com/r/Scotland/comments/6dqito/westminster_voting_intention_scotland_snp_46_1/
Why ?
I'm more thinking that they would form another party and get completely rinsed. I can't see a party formed by them lasting, let alone getting votes. Personally I think the only reason they are still here is because of the name recognition that the Labour Party brings.
Granted there would still be a old Labour right but that's manageable.
Doesn't look uniform across all polls, YouGov has the Tories ahead of Labour by 5 and ComRes has them only 5 off the SNP () Could do with a Panelbase of Scotland soon.
EDIT - As I post that I just saw this on Twitter, Labour have definitely jumped up but Tories still a bit ahead
Why doesn't Corbyn go to the debates just because May won't? It'll be great for his campaign if he shows up and she doesn't. He's letting her off the hook.
Fallon is just as shite Abbott.
Amusingly he tried to add the word 'fabricated' to them.Watched that live, he tried to pass off alternative Boris Johnson quotes and failed badly.
Especially when we hear that the more people see of him the more they like him. If that was even vaguely true Corbyn and his team would have him debating Rod, Jane and Freddy if he was given a prime time platform to do so.
Why doesn't Corbyn go to the debates just because May won't? It'll be great for his campaign if he shows up and she doesn't. He's letting her off the hook.
Because it'd turn into an attack peice on Corbyn whilst May avoids it. Worst case Boris turns up who people already have a low opinion on.
Of course you'd hope that other parties would focus on attacking the Tories but they have vested interests so won't.
Not to say it couldn't work but it'd be risky.
Between 2002 and 2004, Mr Fallon regularly claimed £1,255 per month in capital repayments and interest, rather than the £700-£800 for the interest component alone.
He began making the excessive claims after buying the Westminster flat for £243,000 in June 2002 and designating it as his second home.
Various other household expenses he claimed for after September 2004 included a £250 per month cleaning bill, which Mr Fallon reduced from £300 after being asked for a receipt.
At the time, MPs did not need to provide receipts for claims up to £250. In a letter to the fees office in March 2005, he said: “My cleaner has never provided receipts”.
In May 2005, he claimed £499 for a television, £69.50 for a digital box and £35 for a radio. Mr Fallon sold the flat in December 2006 for £295,000, making a profit of £52,000. He claimed £1,774.50 in legal fees relating to the sale. In the two months before the sale, he claimed £126 for boiler repairs, £170 for repairs to bathroom tiles, £282 for electrical repairs and £225 for carpet cleaning.
He then bought another flat in Westminster for £728,000. Soon after moving in, he claimed £1,795 for a bed, £1,500 for curtains and almost £1,000 for a freezer, washer-dryer and deep cleaner. The claim for the bed was reduced to £1,000.
He then began claiming the interest on the mortgage for his new flat, which came to about £2,100 per month — almost three times as much as at his previous property. Mr Fallon also shares a large house in his Kent constituency with his wife, Wendy. The house, which the couple bought in 1997, is about 28 miles away from Westminster. It is not mortgaged.
In just terms of names who would they have ? Isn't there a chance Clegg who I think is more well know than any of the centrist MP's in Labour might lose his seat. The biggest name would a returning mid 60's Blair and people hate him just if not more than Corbyn. Their politics is not only poison but would be constantly tearing itself part as it tries to find the ''centre'' in world with a right wing Tory Party and a left Labour Party.Even if they were to get rinsed to the point of only getting, say, 6%, that'd probably be enough to cause a good number of seats to swing from Labour to the Tories due to the vote being split. Checked it out on ElectoralCalculus and something as low as that would cause around a 40-seat difference. Something more substantial (10-15%) would have an even bigger effect, and guarantee more Tory government.
The lack of brand recognition would significantly hamper any Labour breakaway, but I think they'd stand a decent chance of doing alright. They'd have some major, recognisable names who would presumably carry on as MP's in this hypothetical new party - again, some of them would likely still win their own constituency, and if they didn't it'd probably be the Tories who benefit.
There's ultimately got to be compromise within Labour. From both sides. The PLP and that ilk have to recognise they've not properly listened to the membership in recent times and that their attempts to undermine Corbyn from the moment he stepped into office were damaging. Likewise, Corbyn's supporters should be able to recognise that he's been highly unpopular and that the centre argument that they're better positioned to win elections does have some credence. In a PR system a breakaway would be fine, but in the current system it's just not viable.
Do you agree with what I wrote or not?
Do you not understand people who agree unless they say the word 'I agree' ?
Corbyn should 100% appear at the BBC leaders debate... preferably as a very late addition if he really wants to create a story around it and leave the other parties underprepared to attack him.
Then he should take every opportunity to call Theresa May a weak leader and accuse her of running scared... consistently asking Rudd why May wouldn't appear herself.
Corbyn should 100% appear at the BBC leaders debate... preferably as a very late addition if he really wants to create a story around it and leave the other parties underprepared to attack him.
Then he should take every opportunity to call Theresa May a weak leader and accuse her of running scared... consistently asking Rudd why May wouldn't appear herself.
NoThat's correct I do not. Did you agree then?
In just terms of names who would they have ? Isn't there a chance Clegg who I think is more well know than any of the centrist MP's in Labour might lose his seat. The biggest name would a returning mid 60's Blair and people hate him just if not more than Corbyn. Their politics is not only poison but would be constantly tearing itself part as it tries to find the ''centre'' in world with a right wing Tory Party and a left Labour Party.
Maybe I am underestimating them and the power of a shit ton of money but I really think they have absolutely nothing to offer
You never know, they might put a reversal of the benefit freeze in their manifesto.In just terms of names who would they have ? Isn't there a chance Clegg who I think is more well know than any of the centrist MP's in Labour might lose his seat. The biggest name would a returning mid 60's Blair and people hate him just if not more than Corbyn. Their politics is not only poison but would be constantly tearing itself part as it tries to find the ''centre'' in world with a right wing Tory Party and a left Labour Party.
Maybe I am underestimating them and the power of a shit ton of money but I really think they have absolutely nothing to offer
If he doesn't go then he's letting her off the hook.
#Cheesy4LabourMediatorI presume they'd have plenty of well-known names: Umunna, Kendall, Cooper, Benn, Jarvis etc. Not that I particularly rate them, or think they're anything great as such, but they'd certainly have a bit of pull. They'd have the majority of current standing MP's from the party, meaning they'd presumably form the opposition in some way.
All-in-all, it just strikes me as a bit...pointless? Their politics may be a 'poison' to you, but I'd argue they'd still represent more of your views in regards to Brexit, the environment, social values etc. They're better than the current Tory a lot, certainly, even if I'm not that fond of them myself. And if Corbyn loses next Thursday, while I don't think the current Labour policies should be swept aside with the party membership being ignored, I do think the left should also listen to the moderates. Compromise is needed from both sides.
That wasn't too hard, was it?
Oh.