owlo
Full Member
- Joined
- Mar 27, 2015
- Messages
- 3,252
If you prefer slipping into an old Banger then you could always go and support Everton!
Still impossible to escape the Rooney jokes I see!
If you prefer slipping into an old Banger then you could always go and support Everton!
If they gave me a tenner, I'd think about it.Question for everyone unsure about him coming here: What price would change your mind?
Question for everyone unsure about him coming here:
What price would change your mind?
Couldn't care less about the price, it's not my money. There are better options out there, he's completely crocked.
No, I'm not saying for 1 solitary game. He played all the games leading up to the final of the biggest competition we were in and definitely played a massive role in that season achieving what we did that season.
I do see your point, but the deals your quoting haven't got half the talent (schweiny did at one point) bale does, so that has to come into the calculation somewhere. It depends on the fee and wages we can negotiate, but if we can play hardball on that and get him to a reasonable level, it's a fair gamble.
There's no guarantee mbappe will be as good as Bale, you could argue you it the other way as well. RM could be handing us a quality player so they can get someone with potential.
Anyway, not particularly up for it as a signing either - but, it would definitely have upsides if he was to come
@devilish
Question for everyone unsure about him coming here:
What price would change your mind?
So you wouldn't even want him on a free?
He's not, he's 28.Perisic is 29;
Perisic desperately wants United; Bale desperately wants Madrid.
They wont which is why i think its a nothing story.
I just dont believe we would be willing to break our transfer record to sign Bale. £60m is the most i think we should be willing to pay
You literally referenced all competitions and then included only Bale's league games to make it look worse.No
Dont even know what you are on about. Perisic has 70 league games for wolfsberg and 70 league games for Inter. But to be fair thats includes a jan transfer but it also includes an knee injury for over 2 months from march to may in those extra months. But despite all this the stat that counts is 64.9%(65%) of games compared to 87.8%. That table is over the exact same time period and includes all games except friendlies. I refenenced all comps as it means more to us who will be in 4 comps and not 2 and to know how many games he will miss as much as be available for.
as for the acknowledgement i'd have not checked that.
I think very few would argue Perisic is better than Bale as a player, but they're more worried about Bale's recent injury record along with the total price (transfer fee and wages). I personally would prefer Bale, out of the 2, but it's a big financial risk. Although, if we were to spend big on a winger, I'd take Dembele over Bale as he's only turned 20 and is already performing at a very high level.I can't believe people would actually prefer Perisic. We have become far too obsessed with solidity and defensive nous; the top six play against teams who set up to defend most of the time.
It's what your front three can do to the other team that matters not what they stop the opponent doing. Which is one of the many reasons why Bale would be an infinitely better signing than Perisic.
I think Hargreaves had a decent 1 season followed by a nightmarish rest of career both in terms of football and in terms of marketing (he did went on to Shitty and blamed the fact that he was a wreck to us). During that period we had a fabulous side with Carrick and Scholes in full pomp at CM. SAF also had his sights set on Marcos Senna who was a much better player Hargreaves won. Therefore I suspect that we would have still won the lot with or without him.
That tells us part of the story though. Bayern went on spending the dosh on a certain Frank Ribery. I’ve yet to find a Bayern Munich fan who feels saddened that Hargreaves left. To be fair, they had quite a lovely nick for him (the English patient).
I confess that the comparison between the two situations is quite striking. If Bale becomes available then United will have to choose again between the most popular player (Hargreaves-Bale) and the most reliable one (Perisic-Senna). Once again we would be dealing again with a top club (Bayern-Real) for an injury prone player whom they ‘does not want to lose’, however they are ‘willing to lose’ if the ‘right offer comes up’. The only difference is that Bale is a highly expensive player (both in terms of fee and salary) while Hargreaves probably had an average salary (a first teamer but not among the high earners).
Good points. I think the only thing separating the two situations is inters wild valuation of perisic. Doubt this would even be a discussion if inter had a fair valuation.
Will be good to see how this all unfolds.
YeaBut as I've repeatedly said, I'd be happy with either, just more excited about Bale
There's no way on this earth we'd pay Perisic that much. That deal looks dead anyway.Perisic is 29; Bale is 28.
Perisic desperately wants United; Bale desperately wants Madrid.
Perisic is very healthy; Bale is very injury prone.
Perisic will cost about 48 million; Bale will cost 100 million according to reports.
Jose really wants Perisic; Jose doesn't seem to want Bale because he believes Bale doesn't seem to want United at all (my interpretation).
Perisic will probably earn about 150,000 - 200,000 a week for 3-4 years; Bale will probably earn about 400,000 for 3-4 years.
As much as I believe Bale can offer more goals, assists and star power when fit, the above are compelling enough reasons for me to cast my vote for Perisic. Unfortunately, he doesn't seem to be available again. If Madrid can sell Bale for less than 70 million, then I can accept the risk as reasonable enough and support the idea of buying Bale. If not, we had better be scrapping what is left of the transfer market to find a winger that can improve the team in his own way.
NopeYou literally referenced all competitions and then included only Bale's league games to make it look worse.
You seem angry.
All clubs have their legends. It's a status earned by few. Chance in Manchester or in Madrid, makes no difference.
Even more so when you say Madrid don't give too hoots about him while reality is that he earns huge money and he has fixed place in starting 11 from day one. What else is there for the club to give him?
As for more context to this story (if it hasn't been posted by now), there are reports that Zidane primary focus is to keep the harmony in the squad and he thinks signing Mbappe without offloading one of BBC would be damaging.
Considering Bale injury record and the results while playing in a different system, it seems logical for the club to want to offload him first.
Perisic is 29; Bale is 28.
Perisic desperately wants United; Bale desperately wants Madrid.
Perisic is very healthy; Bale is very injury prone.
Perisic will cost about 48 million; Bale will cost 100 million according to reports.
Jose really wants Perisic; Jose doesn't seem to want Bale because he believes Bale doesn't seem to want United at all (my interpretation).
Perisic will probably earn about 150,000 - 200,000 a week for 3-4 years; Bale will probably earn about 400,000 for 3-4 years.
As much as I believe Bale can offer more goals, assists and star power when fit, the above are compelling enough reasons for me to cast my vote for Perisic. Unfortunately, he doesn't seem to be available again. If Madrid can sell Bale for less than 70 million, then I can accept the risk as reasonable enough and support the idea of buying Bale. If not, we had better be scrapping what is left of the transfer market to find a winger that can improve the team in his own way.
Different thought but since Jose is experimenting with 352 and for me it's the best we've looked in pre season. Do people think Bale would be used as a LWB? For me it makes sense as to why we are persistent on getting Peresic as as far as left wingers go there are better out there.
If the idea is for a LWB then Peresic then makes sense to me but I have to say if Bale was bought for such a role and was given more attacking licence from the left with Martial and Lukaku loving to play the channels that could open up massive holes for Bale and Pogba to drive through and do the damage. I actually think it would work really well.
On Bale, at the beginning of last season he wa the man keeping them ticking when all the others hadn't found form and were floundering. Reports they rushed him back too quickly from injury and supposedly it's the same repeated injury of a calf issue.
Personally if the idea is more of just getting a superstar I'd rather get someone like Dybala, Dembele or Mbappe but it seems to me like it's more a positional want so if it's under a 100mil do it. I think he still has more to give but just needs to get over that injury bug.
Nah I'm not angry at all. I just don't believe Bale should have the honour to wear the red shirt. He had his chance to come here and his injury record makes him a huge gamble. The quotes around £90 million are ridiculous.
With his injury record I think United could afford to plunk £30m and pay him £150k/wk for 3 years. If he stayed injury free, award the player with a bonus or something.Question for everyone unsure about him coming here:
What price would change your mind?
He massively fecked us over. Pretty much our entire summer transfer window was built around buying him, which means that we must have got a near concrete confirmation from him that he would join.
I don't buy the whole "loyalty" angle at all. There is something odd about the whole thing. I bet he signs for Barcelona in January.